ICO's are already a thing in the past. IEO and even possibly DYCO are what's more beneficial and safer to investors.
Absolutely! ICO projects have too many problems and one of them is the risk of being scammed! Personally, I think there's a rare chance to find a "good" ICO nowadays. I cut my thought about investing in ICO since 2018. At that time, ICO projects got a lot of bad reviews from the community. I think IEO projects should be better for investors! 
Topic: Good ICO vs Bad ICO - page 7. (Read 4402 times)
The reputation of the manager can't be a good factor to determine how trusted the project. Sometimes the good bounty managers can also get a crap project or even scam project. It's better for the newbies to keep focusing into the reputation of project.
You are right, even we can see a lot of big managers like Artezy and wapinter also holding too many project scams. A manager is an ordinary person who makes money like a bounty hunter. who pays them will be done. no matter they will scam or not.
ICO's are already a thing in the past. IEO and even possibly DYCO are what's more beneficial and safer to investors.
I think the leader of the project is the thing that matters the most. There is always a whole team that handles the project, yet there is one leader of them all, the creator, the owner, there is really one person that rules everyone else. Which is why I think that person is the most important one, there is really nothing that matters other than this person.
If you get a project with one person who rules amazingly and is a great person, that means the project will be a good one, if the project leader is a bad one the project will be bad. The team could be awesome or could be bad, if the leader is amazing he will fix whats wrong, and if he is bad he will make what is already good. This is why go after the leader and find out if he is a good person or not and if he is a good leader it will be great.
If you get a project with one person who rules amazingly and is a great person, that means the project will be a good one, if the project leader is a bad one the project will be bad. The team could be awesome or could be bad, if the leader is amazing he will fix whats wrong, and if he is bad he will make what is already good. This is why go after the leader and find out if he is a good person or not and if he is a good leader it will be great.
I think the main criterion of bounty and ICO or IEO rating is project`s partnerships and indicator of social media activity. Projects which are really interested in development and suggesting problem`s solutions are always active and communicate with community, have a lot of updates and often try to find more and more partners
it is difficult to find a good or scammed ICO project, because most ICO projects look real and convincing. if you are an investor it is better not to invest in an ICO project, this is more risky losing your money. my advice if you want to invest in a better project do in IEO that is already listed on the top exchange.
The reputation of the manager can't be a good factor to determine how trusted the project. Sometimes the good bounty managers can also get a crap project or even scam project. It's better for the newbies to keep focusing into the reputation of project.
You are right, even we can see a lot of big managers like Artezy and wapinter also holding too many project scams. A manager is an ordinary person who makes money like a bounty hunter. who pays them will be done. no matter they will scam or not. 
The best way is to check the money manager, there are some bonus managers on the forum who are very reputable and they usually only manage good projects. Hhampuz and yahoo62278 are two reliable bonus managers, I usually do their bonus campaigns and get pretty good rewards.
But they will have tougher requirements than other managers. Most of the campaigns they manage will pay with Bitcoin or ETH, which is why they became popular in this forum.
For Newbie, they do not have too much experience in this market. So they should keep track of the reputation of the bounty managers. Stay tuned and participate in their projects because the chances of success will be higher and they will not be wasting too much time.
The reputation of the manager can't be a good factor to determine how trusted the project. Sometimes the good bounty managers can also get a crap project or even scam project. It's better for the newbies to keep focusing into the reputation of project. The best way is to check the money manager, there are some bonus managers on the forum who are very reputable and they usually only manage good projects. Hhampuz and yahoo62278 are two reliable bonus managers, I usually do their bonus campaigns and get pretty good rewards.
But they will have tougher requirements than other managers. Most of the campaigns they manage will pay with Bitcoin or ETH, which is why they became popular in this forum.The best way is to check the money manager, there are some bonus managers on the forum who are very reputable and they usually only manage good projects. Hhampuz and yahoo62278 are two reliable bonus managers, I usually do their bonus campaigns and get pretty good rewards.
But they will have tougher requirements than other managers. Most of the campaigns they manage will pay with Bitcoin or ETH, which is why they became popular in this forum. 
Testing a bonus program and a project requires a lot of experience. You also need to check the development team, media sites, white papers, and project chat groups.
However, in the current situation, it is difficult to find a project Good ICO, most ICOs at the moment are just an exaggeration and you can easily get back a pile of trash.
However, in the current situation, it is difficult to find a project Good ICO, most ICOs at the moment are just an exaggeration and you can easily get back a pile of trash.
The best way is to check the money manager, there are some bonus managers on the forum who are very reputable and they usually only manage good projects. Hhampuz and yahoo62278 are two reliable bonus managers, I usually do their bonus campaigns and get pretty good rewards.
For Newbie, they do not have too much experience in this market. So they should keep track of the reputation of the bounty managers. Stay tuned and participate in their projects because the chances of success will be higher and they will not be wasting too much time.
Yeah, the newbie doesn't have the experience of research projects or the critics market for the first time just plunged into a bounty promotion, well, we have to know sometimes newbies always carry out promotion of any project without doing research first. 
I doubt that there are still good ico nowadays,
just like what you have said, there are many good ico that still not launch their coins, it is true because most of them have probably left the project behind and keep the money they have collected instead of planning of launching their coin.
just like what you have said, there are many good ico that still not launch their coins, it is true because most of them have probably left the project behind and keep the money they have collected instead of planning of launching their coin.
There are tons of stuff you can check to see if a project is bad or not but at the end of the day the scammers are so ahead of the curve that they know what a good project looks like and they trick you to think they are good by looking at the actually good ones and they try to mimic them and look the same and you fall for it since they look like a legit place but they end up stealing from everyone. Scammers do not just make a website and say "hey we are scammers, give us your money".
They are smart and they know that if they are careful and they can act like they are legit and try to copy what the legit places do, they could still get your money. Which is why it is so hard to decide if a project is a good one or a bad one, because a bad one can do exactly what good one does or just promises to do it.
They are smart and they know that if they are careful and they can act like they are legit and try to copy what the legit places do, they could still get your money. Which is why it is so hard to decide if a project is a good one or a bad one, because a bad one can do exactly what good one does or just promises to do it.
The ICO is dead, and not any successful project with it. IEO currently works well and it helps a lot of people get a return on their investment. And if you join bounty, it is best to select the bounty listed. Your chances are higher and less likely to encounter scams
We have to look at the current trends because IEO is one of the best sales today. Many projects use it, even though sometimes they do it on a low exchange, there are still many interests compared to ICO.If there is an ICO project with a large discount offer then avoid it like that.
For Newbie How check Which bounty program is good or which one is Scammed and i have heard that many good ICO still not launching there coins
Simple pro tip is to join the bounties which are managed by the reputed campaign manager which can reduce the scam risk by considerable amount because they might have done enough research on a project before taking over them for managing it.
Spotting good ICO is based on their project implementation, roadmap, team members or simply looking on the context of their website. Most good projects should have good partnerships that will come in handy when marketing starts. Due to large scale of ICO Scams for past years, IEO now is the trend for crypto projects and it's better that way, more safe and trustworthy to investors. Lastly, doing research will always be the best tools to spot a good and bad projects.
if indeed you hear something like that then that's the reality, because a project that is rumored to be good is not necessarily good as it says.
research and observation only help to speculate the project, and cannot be said to be 100% accurate.
Yes, that's right, many people speculate on the project after doing some research and observation, even though we can't make it as a basic benchmark, especially for reference, because the accuracy is clearly still floating or not clear at all, and things like this tend to make someone get stuck into a project that is not good. research and observation only help to speculate the project, and cannot be said to be 100% accurate.
Jump to: