Happy New Years! Seventh alt coin thread! - page 33.

KaydenC

sr. member

Activity: 610

Merit: 265

Quote from: Storx on March 30, 2018, 10:37:07 AM

Well on better news, i just finished my first 7 days with my latest bot addition to add to my other 3 bots i currently run... some damn good results for 7 days, i installed it on my Raspberry Pi and just left it alone with 0.25btc to trade with for 7 days...
7 days of trading...
68 trades...
0.044btc profit

That image is super small. How much trading commission did you pay in total? I used to write algo trading in stock markets.

In stock market, buying 500 shares of a $100 stock ($50k) costs like $5 comission. In crypto it costs $125... and another $125 to exit the position. Huge negative edge and spreads are large in crypto too.

Storx

full member

Activity: 322

Merit: 233

Well on better news, i just finished my first 7 days with my latest bot addition to add to my other 3 bots i currently run... some damn good results for 7 days, i installed it on my Raspberry Pi and just left it alone with 0.25btc to trade with for 7 days...
7 days of trading...
68 trades...
0.044btc profit

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4354

Merit: 9201

'The right to privacy matters'

Is there any interest in bitmain $420 coupons. At 90% off?

Ie 42 each.

soothaa

hero member

Activity: 1151

Merit: 528

Quote from: KaydenC on March 30, 2018, 10:19:37 AM

Quote from: Storx on March 30, 2018, 10:12:40 AM

Is it me, or did profits just dump into the ground...

I got home this morning to see my monitor showing all my GPU's offline, about had a heart attack until i saw the profit numbers were falling below the minimum profit required to mine threshold for AM that i setup....

It's pretty much lowest profitability ever now: https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/ethereum-mining_profitability.html

Damn thanks for this site.

I don't care personally, everything is paid off and I'm still making 2-3x power costs!

KaydenC

sr. member

Activity: 610

Merit: 265

Quote from: Storx on March 30, 2018, 10:12:40 AM

Is it me, or did profits just dump into the ground...

I got home this morning to see my monitor showing all my GPU's offline, about had a heart attack until i saw the profit numbers were falling below the minimum profit required to mine threshold for AM that i setup....

It's pretty much lowest profitability ever now: https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/ethereum-mining_profitability.html

citronick

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1080

---- winter*juvia -----

Quote from: Storx on March 30, 2018, 10:12:40 AM

Is it me, or did profits just dump into the ground...

I got home this morning to see my monitor showing all my GPU's offline, about had a heart attack until i saw the profit numbers were falling below the minimum profit required to mine threshold for AM that i setup....

Well BTC also tanked so I held off selling today's catch.... interesting to see how high RVN can jump when BTc recovers.

Storx

full member

Activity: 322

Merit: 233

Is it me, or did profits just dump into the ground...

I got home this morning to see my monitor showing all my GPU's offline, about had a heart attack until i saw the profit numbers were falling below the minimum profit required to mine threshold for AM that i setup....

Storx

full member

Activity: 322

Merit: 233

Quote from: rs1x on March 30, 2018, 04:15:04 AM

Quote from: QuintLeo on March 30, 2018, 02:33:23 AM

Whitepaper has issues.

It claims equihash is the Ethereum algorithm (an easy confusion to make, but a WHITE PAPER should have had plenty of time to get checked before it was published).

It claims "ASIC resistant" but there really is nothing in the component algorithms that makes it more ASIC resistant than any of the OTHER "X series multi-algorithm" algorithms that ALREADY HAVE BAIKAL ASIC for them.

The "rotate component algo order based on the last hash" is not going to be hard to set up in an ASIC - Baikal is already most of the way there with how their EXISTING multi-algo miners are set up, just need to add a matrix switch and control logic for it to connect the "process each individual algo" parts in the right order.

I'm not saying it's a bad coin - but some of the underlying assumptions don't stand up to fact checking.

Is it possible that with this ALGO the developers have the ability to flip the matrix around. Just an example:

today the sequence is
0=blake
1=bmw
2=groestl
3=jh
4=keccak
5=skein
6=luffa

tomorrow it could be modified to be

0=bmw
1=blake
2=groestl
3=skein
4=keccak
5=jh
6=luffa

Would that be one measure that could be put into place to prevent ASIC?

It does not need to do that at all, ASIC's are specific to a certain algo in regards to hashpower/watt, so no ASIC manufacture can make a ASIC chip that is efficient at all 16, they are vastly different for a reason...

The only way they could make an ASIC for RVN, it would have to have a generalized cpu like a GPU, so it would have marginal if any benefit over GPU's... The time it takes an ASIC to be researched, cut, and placed into manufacturing is easily 1yr or more, so in that 1yr timeframe newer GPU's will be out and possibly onpar or better in regards to generalized cpu chips....

citronick

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1080

---- winter*juvia -----

Quote from: philipma1957 on March 30, 2018, 07:32:14 AM

I have 20 of my 24 1080ti's on it.

10 go to a crypto-bridge account for sale

10 go to a real wallet for hodl

I have about 42K RVNs left waiting to sell at best price - maybe just HODL this till end of year.

It was so easy to mine tens of thousands of RVNs per week last month - wished I continued...

Now with so many miners hopping into the Raven bandwagon... my entire farm gets only 3-4k per day.

Will leave the 2 farms alone mining ravens until eve of 6th April - then jump to CryptoniteV7.

With so many Monero bots and hives short circuited after the fork - I hope the diff will fall off the cliff.

The first 24 hours will be crucial - both AMD and NVIDIA farms will be cranked up then.

Great mining to everyone!

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4354

Merit: 9201

'The right to privacy matters'

I have 20 of my 24 1080ti's on it.

10 go to a crypto-bridge account for sale

10 go to a real wallet for hodl

vapourminer

legendary

Activity: 4354

Merit: 3614

what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?

Quote from: Storx on March 29, 2018, 09:40:03 PM

Quote from: rs1x on March 29, 2018, 08:12:31 PM

phil what were your overclock settings for RVN.

4 of my rigs are SMOS, 2 are windows. I'm having stablity issues with my windows boxes.

11 of 16 algo's are heavy core intensive, so +Core -Mem works well
remaining 5 are random between +Core and +Mem, so getting unstable results on windows is probably either +Core to high for 1 of 16 algo's or intensity is to high, the stock miner trys to run like 21 intensity i think

been messing with it a bit. nvr with enemy on auto intensity on my 4 nv cards draws an extra 250 watts between the 4 of them heh. auto intensity sets 19 to the 1070/1070ti, and 20 to the 1080tis. same clocks/power/mem as i used for equihash, didnt change anything at all besides the newer 391 nv driver, i was on 385 or something before and enemy crashed with that one. so i read the README heh.. getting ~~57-63~~ 50-55 mh/s right now. varies a lot gotta pay attention as i know the various algos hash different rates.

win10 pro and i also have 3 amd cards running claymore on eth on the same rig. very stable so far.

gonna try to tune for lower watts but i am still learning from you guys. vapourminer, always 2 steps behind. yup thats me.

rs1x

full member

Activity: 284

Merit: 102

This may not benefit many in here but I wanted to report back with my findings.

My two windows rigs are nearly identical. Both 3x. 80ti and both use hp z400 workstatio. Same amount of ram. Neither on ssd.

One is stable with evermore and one is stable with enemy.

Don't know why that is the case but I'm happy to have stability on my two windows boxes.

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4354

Merit: 9201

'The right to privacy matters'

Quote from: DesertMiner on March 30, 2018, 06:46:39 AM

Quote from: Marvell2 on March 29, 2018, 05:01:11 PM

Quote from: DesertMiner on March 29, 2018, 04:25:27 PM

Quote from: adaseb on March 29, 2018, 03:24:16 PM

Quote from: philipma1957 on March 29, 2018, 11:53:33 AM

this Raven coin has a serious up side to it.

I see it over 1 usd by December

Haven't had time to check this coin out.

Is it Nvidia only or can you mine With AMD at fair speeds similiar to Nvidia?

Anyone know what speeds it generates with R9 280X, R9 290 and RX 470

AMD = Nvidia in this algo. My 580 8GB averages around 7.8MH/s at 1400 core 1900 memory. 7.2MH/s at stock 1340 core.

470 is around 5-6. Core speed is the bottleneck. Memory is just as important too on AMD.

As for the r9 290 I couldnt launch the amd miner it just freezes.

Not really Nvidia is alot better, 1070s are at 9mhs. 1070ti 11ms , and you dont have to do anything memory only raise core by say 60 -100

most people have hard code modded rx cards with low core , so moving these to raven is not easily doable

I got my 4 vegas going and they are good 11-15mhs

Prices off newegg as of today:

GTX 1070 stock clocks does 9 Mh/s costs $549, = 61 USD Per Mh/s
RX 570 4GB stock clocks (Same Bios mod used for monero/ether) does 6.2Mh/s costs $340 = 54.84 Per Mh/s

Factor in that they both consume around the same amount of power it takes away AMD's edge and makes Nvidia = AMD.

Factor in people that have the cards and Nvidia is better. A 1080ti takes 1 slot and for me cost = $0

this coin has a big upside it has low market cap.

@ QuintLeo

could they simply make a Monero/Equihash/Eth al-gore-rhythm call it the big 3 coin.

Would not that coin be asic resistant? I suppose it would be good.

DesertMiner

jr. member

Activity: 60

Merit: 3

Quote from: Marvell2 on March 29, 2018, 05:01:11 PM

Quote from: DesertMiner on March 29, 2018, 04:25:27 PM

Quote from: adaseb on March 29, 2018, 03:24:16 PM

Quote from: philipma1957 on March 29, 2018, 11:53:33 AM

this Raven coin has a serious up side to it.

I see it over 1 usd by December

Haven't had time to check this coin out.

Is it Nvidia only or can you mine With AMD at fair speeds similiar to Nvidia?

Anyone know what speeds it generates with R9 280X, R9 290 and RX 470

AMD = Nvidia in this algo. My 580 8GB averages around 7.8MH/s at 1400 core 1900 memory. 7.2MH/s at stock 1340 core.

470 is around 5-6. Core speed is the bottleneck. Memory is just as important too on AMD.

As for the r9 290 I couldnt launch the amd miner it just freezes.

Not really Nvidia is alot better, 1070s are at 9mhs. 1070ti 11ms , and you dont have to do anything memory only raise core by say 60 -100

most people have hard code modded rx cards with low core , so moving these to raven is not easily doable

I got my 4 vegas going and they are good 11-15mhs

Prices off newegg as of today:

GTX 1070 stock clocks does 9 Mh/s costs $549, = 61 USD Per Mh/s
RX 570 4GB stock clocks (Same Bios mod used for monero/ether) does 6.2Mh/s costs $340 = 54.84 Per Mh/s

Factor in that they both consume around the same amount of power it takes away AMD's edge and makes Nvidia = AMD.

rs1x

full member

Activity: 284

Merit: 102

Quote from: QuintLeo on March 30, 2018, 02:33:23 AM

Whitepaper has issues.

It claims equihash is the Ethereum algorithm (an easy confusion to make, but a WHITE PAPER should have had plenty of time to get checked before it was published).

It claims "ASIC resistant" but there really is nothing in the component algorithms that makes it more ASIC resistant than any of the OTHER "X series multi-algorithm" algorithms that ALREADY HAVE BAIKAL ASIC for them.

The "rotate component algo order based on the last hash" is not going to be hard to set up in an ASIC - Baikal is already most of the way there with how their EXISTING multi-algo miners are set up, just need to add a matrix switch and control logic for it to connect the "process each individual algo" parts in the right order.

I'm not saying it's a bad coin - but some of the underlying assumptions don't stand up to fact checking.

Is it possible that with this ALGO the developers have the ability to flip the matrix around. Just an example:

today the sequence is
0=blake
1=bmw
2=groestl
3=jh
4=keccak
5=skein
6=luffa

tomorrow it could be modified to be

0=bmw
1=blake
2=groestl
3=skein
4=keccak
5=jh
6=luffa

Would that be one measure that could be put into place to prevent ASIC?

QuintLeo

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1030

Whitepaper has issues.

It claims equihash is the Ethereum algorithm (an easy confusion to make, but a WHITE PAPER should have had plenty of time to get checked before it was published).

It claims "ASIC resistant" but there really is nothing in the component algorithms that makes it more ASIC resistant than any of the OTHER "X series multi-algorithm" algorithms that ALREADY HAVE BAIKAL ASIC for them.

The "rotate component algo order based on the last hash" is not going to be hard to set up in an ASIC - Baikal is already most of the way there with how their EXISTING multi-algo miners are set up, just need to add a matrix switch and control logic for it to connect the "process each individual algo" parts in the right order.

I'm not saying it's a bad coin - but some of the underlying assumptions don't stand up to fact checking.

citronick

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1080

---- winter*juvia -----

Quote from: soothaa on March 29, 2018, 03:49:15 PM

Quote from: rdluffy on March 29, 2018, 03:43:25 PM

Quote from: soothaa on March 29, 2018, 03:36:01 PM

Are you guys getting wild hashrate fluctuations on RVN?

My 1080 tis go from 17-22-15.. they're just all over the place.

EDIT: They're all reporting 28MHs now O_o

Yes, the algo is a combinations of 16 algos, every algo have a different hashrate

Huh! Cool thanks for the info..

Reading the whitepaper the MIT devs created X16R algo specifically for the RVN coin - and to be ASIC resistant.

The X16R hashing algorithm consists of 16 hashing algorithms operating in chain
fashion with the ordering dependent on the last 8 bytes (16 nibbles) of the hash of the
previous block. The algorithms are as follows:

0=blake
1=bmw
2=groestl
3=jh
4=keccak
5=skein
6=luffa
7=cubehash
8=shavite
9=simd
A=echo
B=hamsi
C=fugue
D=shabal
E=whirlpool
F=sha512

Example:
Previous Block Hash:
0000000000000000007e8a29f052ac2870045ae3970270f97da00919b8e86287

The final 8 bytes: 0x7da00919b8e86287

Each hex digit (nibble) determines which algorithm to use next.

cubehash -> shabal -> echo -> blake -> blake -> simd -> bmw -> simd -> hamsi ->
shavite -> whirlpool -> shavite -> luffa -> groestl -> shavite -> cubehash

Marvell2

full member

Activity: 1148

Merit: 132

hmm nvida still gets great hash rate on raven with negative mem set or even zero

how is that if some of the algos are memory intensive

Storx

full member

Activity: 322

Merit: 233

Quote from: rs1x on March 29, 2018, 08:12:31 PM

phil what were your overclock settings for RVN.

4 of my rigs are SMOS, 2 are windows. I'm having stablity issues with my windows boxes.

11 of 16 algo's are heavy core intensive, so +Core -Mem works well
remaining 5 are random between +Core and +Mem, so getting unstable results on windows is probably either +Core to high for 1 of 16 algo's or intensity is to high, the stock miner trys to run like 21 intensity i think

Storx

full member

Activity: 322

Merit: 233

Quote from: soothaa on March 29, 2018, 03:36:01 PM

Are you guys getting wild hashrate fluctuations on RVN?

My 1080 tis go from 17-22-15.. they're just all over the place.

EDIT: They're all reporting 28MHs now O_o

RVN is made up of multiple Algo's all tied into one, it switches algo's every 2mins and 30 seconds roughly, the miner currently is set to average out the hashrate over a 30second period, so your seeing the differences in algo's mining and being combined together

Topic: Happy New Years! Seventh alt coin thread! - page 33. (Read 34211 times)