Topic: Hardcap ICO is no guarantee that the project will succeed - page 20. (Read 31507 times)
My opinion about the project that has been hardcapped is why it doesn't match the expectations, usually the project has a bad or unclear team, and he made the project as good as possible to attract as many investors as possible to buy the project, I agree also about no ico or premine average projects like success because the team is very focused on development and markets such as sentiavate, apollo, etc.
Unfortunately, even a professional team is not a guarantee of a successful project. Sometimes projects with famous people in the crypto world do not develop. Many good projects were in 2017–2018. The one who managed to invest in them received a good profit.
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
Some project can be successful even not reached hardcap, so the project success won't depends on it.
In 2017, there were many ICO's hit hardcap and it was a successful ICO, token value was not dropping after, because many peoples were buying.
but now, it is very rare to see such an ICO that hit hardcap in this long bear market.
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
For being here in more than 1 year, I saw that it is very seldom for the project ico that achieved hardcap. Most of it achieved soft cap, and the saddest things is like what you had mentioned there are few ico achieved hardcap but in the end it didn't succeed. But you can try this one ico project on which I think is good https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bountyxbasecmc-6xx-eterbase-exchange-1m-xbasemonth-fbtwtgsig-5137308
I also think that hardcap is not the only reason or even not a guarantee that a project will be successful. because the determinant is hard work from the developer to continue to run the roadmap consistently and keep prices from falling, increase the community and cooperate with other parties who can support the development of their projects.
In this case there is no guarantee against ICC hardcap, many factors affect it all. We don't know what will happen next. Therefore we must have a backup strategy to deal with what will happen because there is no party providing ICO hardcap guarantees that will produce good results.
Yes that's right, a project reaching it's hard cap is not a guarantee to its success. The team might not fulfill its agenda thus making project to fail. So yes money raised its no guarantee to the success of a project.
An ICO hitting hardcap is obviously a sign that it has hype and people have interest in the project. But this is no way a guarantee that the project will do well. What if they don't even have plans to develop a product? What if they show case an MVP to lure people into buying in? What if the team is only after the money? Well, most projects hitting hardcap do better than those which struggle to hit softcap.
there is no guarantee that a successful project in funding will be successful in carrying out or carrying out the projeck. I am sure that today many have failed when they were indeed successful funding but failed to develop the project
That is the plain truth and with no doubt. Most projects achieved this with ease and yet no value still or any tangible developement. I have came across a project that achieved only softcap, got listed on a DEX and did well, before going over to centralized exchange. So I think it all depends on the team and what they really know.
Yes that's true and it depends solely on the team and if they are experienced enough to offer what was in the whitepaper. The truth is most of these team lacks the right knowledge of what they are aiming to offer, how then can they be able to deliver even with Hardcap. In my own opinion, even with sotfcap a good team will always Deliver.
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
I am agree that reaching hard cap target is not guarantee the project will success and the price will increase when listed in market. I know a few project, reach hard cap target and the project raise more than $50million but the price right now 90% below ICO Price.
You have said it all. There are projects out there without Hardcap performing wonders while being listed on good exchanges. The truth is, Hardcap or not, but with sotfcap a good team will still look for ways to proceed with their aims, while an inefficient team will use see it as an excuse.
its depend on developers work.if they could use collected fund in ico into correct allocation and able to deliver product to investors and crypto community their token will be very well in market.most of investors in market prefer to buy this kind of projects no matter they hardcap or not.
You have said it all. There are projects out there without Hardcap performing wonders while being listed on good exchanges. The truth is, Hardcap or not, but with sotfcap a good team will still look for ways to proceed with their aims, while an inefficient team will use see it as an excuse.
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
Some projects dev and team are really great and they are helpful. And they want to list on a different kind of exchange and that they really want to grow up their project very good position. But some of the projects did not get listed for scamming money. There thinking about to scam. So Hardcap ICO is no guarantee that the project will succeed.
That's true, achieveing Hardcap doesn't mean the project will last long term.
I have seen project whose team kicked off with just sotfcap and yet trying their best to offer value to Investors. At the same time, I have seen project who team achieved Hardcap without stress, yet couldn't list on good exchange nor offer any reasonable developement.
I have seen project whose team kicked off with just sotfcap and yet trying their best to offer value to Investors. At the same time, I have seen project who team achieved Hardcap without stress, yet couldn't list on good exchange nor offer any reasonable developement.
I agree, HC is not a guarantee, but it can be a reference that the project has a good concept, maybe not for the near future, some projects need more time to build their ecosystem, for that it must be more careful if you invest in a project, not tempted with the lure of "hardcap"
For the crypto startups, it is more than a guarantee that their system will rune and they would be able to take care of the costs and other stuff that is needed to launch a coins and make it successful. This has happened in IEOs conducted on the Binance exchange and they have been able to get the hard cap raised within a span of few minutes of seconds for many projects. 
Most of these projects that claim to have hit hard cap are just a sham. They make up this to lure more investors into the project. And even if they acually met hard cap, it's not a guarantee to the success of the project as you said.
Right now this is true since most of the ICO now are keep on claiming that they hit their hardcap, but still their project are down. Hardcap doesn’t mean a good project, you have to look for the manipulation side and ask the community if they really see a good future with it. I have invested before, they hit the hardcap and yet its super cheap coins now luckily to sold it early with a small profit. 
You are absolutely correct regarding this issue. The long term success of the project depends a lot on the competence and integrity of the team. A lot of the time, it happens that once the ICO is over, the project goes into hibernation mode. And this has happened to a lot of the promising projects, despite reaching the hard cap limit.
That's true ico or reaching hardcap is not a guarantee that the project will be successful. This is a thing about crypto there are no guarantees at all. The project which looks absolutely successful can be failed, doubtful one can be very successful. There are a lot of things from depends will project successfully or not and luck is very big part of it.
I don’t think luck has anything to do with the success of a project, if they wanted luck, they would have just gone through gambling to raise their fund, this is people’s investment we are talking about, they assured investor that the project will be a successful one and that is why investors gave their money, they would have stated it in their project that the success of the project is based on luck and see if they will get a dime. Project developers do not need luck, what they need is a working product and they need to be very hardworking to make the product known to the world. A quality product and solid marketing strategy is the key to a successful project.
Jump to: