Topic: Hardcap ICO is no guarantee that the project will succeed - page 16. (Read 31507 times)
ICO also counts in the success of a project, because if there is no money, then how can the project move on. The main thing that moves a project is the team, when the team is dedicated and ready to push the project to all lengths, then it will be successful.
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
Most projects that reach the hardcap in the future do not guarantee that they will grow or even the price of the coins will decline. But there are also those who reach the hardcap and the project is indeed developing. So it all seems to depend on the project how to respond to the future by reaching hardcap.but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
There are many things that become a benchmark for evaluating an ico project to succeed or not, the perspective of each person is different. Usually a Project has exposure to both the vision and mission and the time limit. This is where we need to adjust the data and facts when they describe it.
There is general no guarantee that a project will succeed and it definitely does not depend on money that they raised. There were some teams that collected 75 million USD and failed to make a good project. The only thing that they did, they dropped the price by 15 times.
Nowadays, nothing guarantees the success of a project, except that if a project conducts an IEO on the basis of such exchanges as Binance, Huobi or Okex, all other IEO projects are of little profit.
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
Investors are now staying away from ICO and they have a good reason to be, millions of dollars have been lost in ICO, and there are now better alternatives, like STO and IEO so why risk investing in ICO when there is a much safer environment and profitable too.
But if a project collects the maximum amount of funds, we can say that people like the project, of course hardcap is not the most important thing in the project
Many good projects I know of never did introduce any form of fund raising e g ICO and I still wonder why they always do better than the ones that are funded
What ever it takes even reaches the hardcap or not I'm sure that Dencoin will be a successful project that we may invest and join,This can help us to make profits and the project was designed to help people in the future so this project has the good ideas amd not just benefits their team but also people who will use the project and invest the project.
Yes it has never been a guarantee that the project will succeed and I think that ICO has been rejected by the mass crypto users because of the lacking points and the shortcomings that made people loose their money. So I think that even if there is a ICOs with great ability to achieve the hard cap and maybe a great project, people might still not invest. Hardcap aren't meant to guarantee the project success anyway. Hardcap was mainly to limit the fund that got gathered through crowdfunding in this case is ICO and that point is to give certainty and satisfaction for the ICO investors. There's nothing wrong if a project didnt reach their hardcap
your opinion is very correct, hardcap is only the determination of the target with the amount of funds that have been set. all depend on the development carried out by the team. I think you also saw a number of projects that managed to get hardcap but until now the development has not gone so well. from less good exchanges to low trading. all of that does not reflect the development that should be carried out by the team with very large funds. 
I do fully agree with that, that will still depend on the experience of the team behind the project, especially the programmer and marketing manager are the two crucial for the job to be done they have to be good for the projects to grow and succeed
Hardcap aren't meant to guarantee the project success anyway. Hardcap was mainly to limit the fund that got gathered through crowdfunding in this case is ICO and that point is to give certainty and satisfaction for the ICO investors. There's nothing wrong if a project didnt reach their hardcap
I do fully agree with that, that will still depend on the experience of the team behind the project, especially the programmer and marketing manager are the two crucial for the job to be done they have to be good for the projects to grow and succeed
Hardcap aren't meant to guarantee the project success anyway. Hardcap was mainly to limit the fund that got gathered through crowdfunding in this case is ICO and that point is to give certainty and satisfaction for the ICO investors. There's nothing wrong if a project didnt reach their hardcap
I do fully agree with that, that will still depend on the experience of the team behind the project, especially the programmer and marketing manager are the two crucial for the job to be done they have to be good for the projects to grow and succeed
What ever it takes even reaches the hardcap or not I'm sure that Dencoin will be a successful project that we may invest and join,This can help us to make profits and the project was designed to help people in the future so this project has the good ideas amd not just benefits their team but also people who will use the project and invest the project.
Yes you are right nothing is sure or guarantee here in crypto industry even in ICO. Like you said there is no clear references. So accept the fact that all that we are doing and all thatbwe working is there is no sure and guaranteed income because it is clear at the first you invest and to work here in crypto industry.
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
so without realistic goals, good marketing and also a really very good idea it is impossible for a long time to reach the HC
who still succeeds now has in my eyes really achieved something. but even if only the SC is reached and the rest is good it is enough.
Hardcap is simply the maximum amount of funds that can be collected to build a project. But that not withstanding, there are so many other underlying factors that can determine the success of a project and one is a "marketable working product".
Even today the hardcap can be manipulated by their own team. this happens usually as a result of the initial idea of cheating. so many list of projects that have the potential to scam right now due to lack of transparency in funds. there is so much evidence and examples of failed projects 
Look on hard cap of new ICO) they already gain a lot of money and don't need a project) Old successful projects was under 1 million of usd) and now 20-30 millions of usd) And the team have most of the tokens)
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
It is a truth that attaining the hard cap is not a guarantee that the project will be successful on the long run. There have been so many projects that did a very successful ICO and yet they still struggle. but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
Of course, the ICO team’s achievement of hardcap is just evidence that investors believed the ICO project team that this project will be successful. However, in the future, for various reasons, the ICO team may misuse the funds raised and the project may be unsuccessful or even the team may turn out to be fraudsters.
it is true that if a project does not require an ICO, maybe the project developer already has the capital to build the company in crypto. So far, many projects have held ICO aimed at raising funds so that the project can run with successful but true hardcap ICO sales when sales will not guarantee that projects get high stock prices because everything also depends on their products and the community in the project.
Jump to: