- ICOs who didn't reach hard cap yet succeeded
- ICOs who reached hard cap and also succeeded
- ICOs who reached hard cap yet failed and
- ICOs who scammed.
So yeah, hardcaps in ICOs are just plain numbers which means nothing.
Topic: Hardcap ICO is no guarantee that the project will succeed - page 27. (Read 31507 times)
There has been a shitload of ICOs in the last 2-3 years. Among them you can find many examples where the below has occured
So yeah, hardcaps in ICOs are just plain numbers which means nothing.
So yeah, hardcaps in ICOs are just plain numbers which means nothing.
At the moment I have not found a project that can reach Hard cap. And I think many ICO projects have difficulty reaching Hard cap. Maybe what you say is true that not all projects that reach Hardcap can succeed. But I think what makes a success is how the Team, Developer and Community work. All three must be able to work well and continue to develop the platform. So that the project can achieve success.
Hardcap is also not a sign of success in IEO projects. This is just a confirmation that investors believed the ICO project team and gave them their money. In the future, it all depends on the actions of the ICO team itself. It can escape with the money received, or spend it inefficiently, or their activity will be crowned with success and then their tokens will increase in value.
Of course, projects that do not carry out ICO (or premine) are good projects 
After all, this means that they already have money to develop the project.
Or it means that they have no money, and they want to "shoot" at the expense of the idea. And this is very, very risky.
After all, this means that they already have money to develop the project.Or it means that they have no money, and they want to "shoot" at the expense of the idea. And this is very, very risky.
I've seen many projects that have no ICO and no premine performing better than ICO projects and these no ICO projects have lesser chance of scam unlike ICO the funds is enough to be a target for scammers
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
If the idea of the project is good, it will in any case be successful, with or without ICO. But, even the most excellent project without ICO requires investment. Take the Etherium, this super successful project and he spent the ICO.
I think that now nothing at all can give any guarantees of the project’s success. even if IEO is on a large exchange, the project may die in half a year
Indeed many ICO that succeed years back where projects that actually was backed up with workable product and not just to attract investors to make investment. Even these days with IEO, many tokens that seem good and sure of guarantee may fail to succeed in the future. Have seen ICO that succeed in reaching the Hardcap but yet still fail for the reason of non workable prodcut behind the project.
I think only a few ICOs have reached hardcap, because now they are losing to the IEO. The real project of course the speed of the clear and develover roadmap will continue to struggle to develop the ICO funds obtained, so overall I think the ICO that reaches hardcap will grow rapidly compared to those who reach the softcap.
In my opinion, hardcap an ICO becomes a benchmark if the project is successful. indeed the location of the success of a project is not only based on the ICO hardcap, but there are still other factors that determine a project will succeed.
I think that now nothing at all can give any guarantees of the project’s success. even if IEO is on a large exchange, the project may die in half a year
It is true that if the ICO is achieved the hard cap, that doesn't mean the project will go longer or the whole investors will get a better unbelieveable reward in the future. I know one project named as Bunny Token I invested there and still in very unmind situation. I had invested some $500, but now the whole value is only $0.75. So, while invest be sure the project is very sure and challenging in the long run.
full member
Activity: 882
Merit: 102
PayAccept - Worldwide payments accepted in seconds
I know about many coins that reached hard-cap even they were scam. For example Envion.
There are many coins that reached hard-cap, they are successful but the price didn´t reach ICO price because all potentional investors invested in ICO phase, but there are no other investors and price is going slowly down.
There are many coins that reached hard-cap, they are successful but the price didn´t reach ICO price because all potentional investors invested in ICO phase, but there are no other investors and price is going slowly down.
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
In anyhow there's no such words as guarantee inside this industry, there's a lots of projects which we can see every now and then, with high competitions inside even those who comes up from ico's who reached both soft and hard cap still not an assurance to succeed, will still lean with how the usage will be acquired by end users, In regards to your opinion about project who used own resources, I can agree that they can be solid and a good one to check. but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
there is no guarantee for any project to be succes, even a project reach the hard cap
because now a lot of competitors in the market,
anyway a project without ICO or premine can be a good choice, because from the beginning the dev team use their own money to create their project
I agree with your opinion but speaking of successful projects, i think reaching hard cap and soft cap is the first step that the project would be successful, especially reaching hard cap projects, i think the price of the tokens behind their project would be good but not totally good in long time holdings.
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
Yes, hardcap does not mean that the project will be successful. But then the failure of the project team will be revealed. So it is not only the project, the team that runs the project must be selected well.
Its just a shame to almost all ICO projects ,they make the 'fund' look like the only thing they needed to make the project a success one but they fail, I wonder how coins with no ICO are successful without funds
all these ICOs are doing is that they keep changing trivial things to seem different otherwise they are still doomed to fail because they have no usages. they don't change what matters which is utilities and innovation, they keep on changing caps, name from ICO to IEO, hype, even change platfrom from ethereum to other platforms but in the end they get dumped just the same.
Reaching hardcap does not mean that ICO will be successful. Even after several projects reached hardcap, the price fell like others. The team should be experienced. Because it is not easy to survive in the present situation.
I see some projects never got listed into any exchanges even after reaching their hard cap values in 2018,so the success depends on how the team work after making profits from the sale,if they just here to make profits then people who invested on those projects will be losers.
Jump to: