You are very right
Projects hitting softcap and hardcap are not only lazy
But they joke around with the earned money
Look around; projects that are self funded strive positively in exchange listing and even in their development
Topic: Hardcap ICO is no guarantee that the project will succeed - page 28. (Read 31507 times)
Reaching hard cap is one of the many achievements that a project want to reach but this isn't an indicator that whole project itself can be said as a successful project.
That's just the beginning of the project and they are funded properly because they have made it to the hard cap. The success of an ICO can be determined on how they are making with the progress through their promised road map.
That's just the beginning of the project and they are funded properly because they have made it to the hard cap. The success of an ICO can be determined on how they are making with the progress through their promised road map.
I also agree with you, there are some ICO that have reached hardcap but after list coin in market they have very cheap prices and their products are not released soon, I don't know that team works slowly or indeed they don't use well-collected funds
although it does not guarantee that it is successful, it has a huge potential for success, because it has become a matter that needs to be handled by the developer of a project, and how experienced they are in managing the fund to make the ICO successful. that's why it's important to choose a professional team.
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
there is just a few ICO that reach hard cap and price of the coin/token steadily increase
but as you stated above that there are many projects that don't launch an ICO/Premine still has a good value like Nano(Formerly XRB)
I have even seen the projects that have raised huge funds in the ico and then the team work to develop the platform or website for several months and also comes up with the product but the platform still struggles to attract customers and business and also tells on the value of their token so yes their is no guarantee and even an outstanding idea and project can fail.
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
Most projects that reach the hardcap in the future do not guarantee that they will grow or even the price of the coins will decline. But there are also those who reach the hardcap and the project is indeed developing. So it all seems to depend on the project how to respond to the future by reaching hardcap. but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
Jump to: