Sold out?
While I am sad for the new bag holders, I'm happy because that means you'll be paying the refunds you owe people and shipping the months delayed products.
Right?
Topic: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: up to 800GH/s - page 12. (Read 29887 times)
Do you actually own CT hardware or are you only presuming to speak for those who do?
Why don't you stop worrying about Cointerra and worry about HashFast shipping product?
stop comparing to cointerra. They have done much better at assembling and shipping devices so far
Not according to their own customers:
It's been a week and I can't even get an RMA for my defective [Cointerra] unit. 
I requested a refund a full 20 days ago.. i have not heard anything from [Cointerra] about it... WTF
This new firmware has made the bum January unit even more unstable, now it'll only hash at the high rate briefly before the rates tank and a reboot only gets the normal rates briefly before it tanks again. And of course this is a unit that showed up suspiciously missing the warranty stickers and missing the plug guard and with rubber feet already screwed in-I'm almost 100% sure this unit had problems during testing at cointerra.
Do you actually own CT hardware or are you only presuming to speak for those who do?
there is a lot of saying 'cointerra didnt meet 500GH' while saying 'we can achieve 800GH!'
Cointerr has units in customers hands - lots of units. hashfast has a massive line of customers still waiting on the MPP (which was a protection against late delivery - ohh the irony)
They then go on to flail wildly about having a 2.1TH miner using 3 chips. That means that the miraculous 800GH chips are actually running at about 700GH, or almost 15% under spec. I could shove 20 antminers into a server cabinet and call it a 4TH machine - would that make it a better product then hashfast's pathetic 2TH?
..the answer is yes. I would have those 20 antminers in a cabinet in less than a week from today. Hashfast might ship something in a month or two or three. Obviously my 4TH antminer system is now the greatest bitcoin ASIC of all time by hashfast standards
Cointerr has units in customers hands - lots of units. hashfast has a massive line of customers still waiting on the MPP (which was a protection against late delivery - ohh the irony)
They then go on to flail wildly about having a 2.1TH miner using 3 chips. That means that the miraculous 800GH chips are actually running at about 700GH, or almost 15% under spec. I could shove 20 antminers into a server cabinet and call it a 4TH machine - would that make it a better product then hashfast's pathetic 2TH?
..the answer is yes. I would have those 20 antminers in a cabinet in less than a week from today. Hashfast might ship something in a month or two or three. Obviously my 4TH antminer system is now the greatest bitcoin ASIC of all time by hashfast standards
The wild flailing (and OP) are about HashFast's new world record holding 750+ GH/s ASIC.
The 2.1TH Sierra EVO using only 3 chips is just one possible configuration and it comes in a 4U box, unlike a 4TH antminer (which would take up about 6 times as much space).
If HashFast's spec-smashing 2TH is pathetic, then what are CT's 20% power and performance misses?
so now its 750GH+? You should change the thread title if you are willing to admit 800GH has not been achieved yet
my point about a 4TH antminer is not the size, its that saying your box is fastest is meaningless. Customer reviews sell a product, and right now your customers have less than they were promised and sound pretty angry about it.
again, if 3 chips got 2.1TH instead of 800*3=2.4TH, then you missed your target by 12.5%. Might be better than CT, but your product has not been tested by a 3rd party, and it is easy to assume that in less ideal situations it may be much closer to 20% off-target.
seriously though, stop comparing to cointerra. They have done much better at assembling and shipping devices so far
HashFast's new world record holding 750+ GH/s ASIC.
This isn't the ASIC Olympics.
there is a lot of saying 'cointerra didnt meet 500GH' while saying 'we can achieve 800GH!'
Cointerr has units in customers hands - lots of units. hashfast has a massive line of customers still waiting on the MPP (which was a protection against late delivery - ohh the irony)
They then go on to flail wildly about having a 2.1TH miner using 3 chips. That means that the miraculous 800GH chips are actually running at about 700GH, or almost 15% under spec. I could shove 20 antminers into a server cabinet and call it a 4TH machine - would that make it a better product then hashfast's pathetic 2TH?
..the answer is yes. I would have those 20 antminers in a cabinet in less than a week from today. Hashfast might ship something in a month or two or three. Obviously my 4TH antminer system is now the greatest bitcoin ASIC of all time by hashfast standards
Cointerr has units in customers hands - lots of units. hashfast has a massive line of customers still waiting on the MPP (which was a protection against late delivery - ohh the irony)
They then go on to flail wildly about having a 2.1TH miner using 3 chips. That means that the miraculous 800GH chips are actually running at about 700GH, or almost 15% under spec. I could shove 20 antminers into a server cabinet and call it a 4TH machine - would that make it a better product then hashfast's pathetic 2TH?
..the answer is yes. I would have those 20 antminers in a cabinet in less than a week from today. Hashfast might ship something in a month or two or three. Obviously my 4TH antminer system is now the greatest bitcoin ASIC of all time by hashfast standards
The wild flailing (and OP) are about HashFast's new world record holding 750+ GH/s ASIC.
The 2.1TH Sierra EVO using only 3 chips is just one possible configuration and it comes in a 4U box, unlike a 4TH antminer (which would take up about 6 times as much space).
If HashFast's spec-smashing 2TH is pathetic, then what are CT's 20% power and performance misses?
there is a lot of saying 'cointerra didnt meet 500GH' while saying 'we can achieve 800GH!'
Cointerr has units in customers hands - lots of units. hashfast has a massive line of customers still waiting on the MPP (which was a protection against late delivery - ohh the irony)
They then go on to flail wildly about having a 2.1TH miner using 3 chips. That means that the miraculous 800GH chips are actually running at about 700GH, or almost 15% under spec. I could shove 20 antminers into a server cabinet and call it a 4TH machine - would that make it a better product then hashfast's pathetic 2TH?
..the answer is yes. I would have those 20 antminers in a cabinet in less than a week from today. Hashfast might ship something in a month or two or three. Obviously my 4TH antminer system is now the greatest bitcoin ASIC of all time by hashfast standards
Cointerr has units in customers hands - lots of units. hashfast has a massive line of customers still waiting on the MPP (which was a protection against late delivery - ohh the irony)
They then go on to flail wildly about having a 2.1TH miner using 3 chips. That means that the miraculous 800GH chips are actually running at about 700GH, or almost 15% under spec. I could shove 20 antminers into a server cabinet and call it a 4TH machine - would that make it a better product then hashfast's pathetic 2TH?
..the answer is yes. I would have those 20 antminers in a cabinet in less than a week from today. Hashfast might ship something in a month or two or three. Obviously my 4TH antminer system is now the greatest bitcoin ASIC of all time by hashfast standards
As of right now, all the Cointerra has done is make 1.3TH/s boxes into 1.6TH/s boxes with new firmware
Yes, it is unbelievable that HashFast beat Cointerra to demonstrating a 2TH/s miner, especially since Cointerra advertised "500GH/s" chips and was supposedly the ASIC Dream Team.
Even more unvelievable is that HashFast's Sierra EVO only uses 3 chips to get 2TH/s, while Cointerra's uses 4 and only gets ~1.6 (if you're lucky).
What a treat to unveil our 2TH/s beast in Austin, right in Cointerra's back yard!
Even more unvelievable is that HashFast's Sierra EVO only uses 3 chips to get 2TH/s, while Cointerra's uses 4 and only gets ~1.6 (if you're lucky).
What a treat to unveil our 2TH/s beast in Austin, right in Cointerra's back yard!
OTOH, Cointerra's chip is still being misrepresented as "500GH/s" when it actually only gets about 400GH/s. Even after a two month delay, they couldn't get their machines to run at the promised 2TH/s. The only company in the world selling mining equipment that really hashes at 2TH/s is HashFast (hence our name).
True or False: CoinTerra's first ASIC's Hash-Rate is greater than 500 GH/s?
This is the Custom Hardware subforum. We are supposed to discuss things like
-HashFast ASIC specs (original 400GH/s goal met, now up to 800GH/s)
-Cointerra ASIC specs (much less than original 500GH/s target)
-HashFast ASIC specs (original 400GH/s goal met, now up to 800GH/s)
-Cointerra ASIC specs (much less than original 500GH/s target)
In other news, Cointerra *did not* demonstrate a working 2.1TH/s miner in Austin at last week's Bitcoin Conference, or anywhere else. Ever.
I'm confused. Is this the Cointerra thread? Why does HF_CL keep talking about Cointerra, Cointerra, Cointerra?
I bought a HF product. Please ship it.
I never would, thanks for your apprehension 
so, if I order your new product now and pay immediately, when will it be delivered?
Before or after the products I ordered and paid in September 2013? Which still didn't arrive by the way.
Scheduled delivery date of your advertised product? Simple, on topic question.
Before or after the products I ordered and paid in September 2013? Which still didn't arrive by the way.
Scheduled delivery date of your advertised product? Simple, on topic question.
Please don't
so, if I order your new product now and pay immediately, when will it be delivered?
Before or after the products I ordered and paid in September 2013? Which still didn't arrive by the way.
Scheduled delivery date of your advertised product? Simple, on topic question.
Before or after the products I ordered and paid in September 2013? Which still didn't arrive by the way.
Scheduled delivery date of your advertised product? Simple, on topic question.
HashFast has a working assembly line at CIARA, an ISO9000 certified leader in assembling/testing/shipping high tech hardware.
From the 4 machines I received (3 months late), all of them had loose screws rattling around in the enclosures. Some of the BBJet boards were only attached with one screw, and hanging from the wiring harness
Quality assembly my ass
Loose screws is one thing, but one of the cases had one long black bolt in surplus, a clear mistake during the mounting of the water cooling
If Ciara is such a great leader in gettings quick out of the door, why have I not seen the Batch #1 MPP ship? Or the upgrade kits? Or the Sierras from Batch #2?
Surely Ciara can keep up with the parts you ship them?
Having a demo unit to show off at conference is not the same as having a mass produced product. So you sold out your EVO Batch #1, why is holding you back from shipping it to your eagerly awaiting customers? You have the parts....
My unit also arrived needing some assembly. There were screws rattling around at the bottom of my case and one of the fans was on backwards. They should not put any new units up for sale until they get better quality control and ship to their existing clients. There are people from batch 2 still waiting for their equipment.
HashFast_CL,
You still haven't posted proof that your new ASIC can get up to 800GH/s. Neither the stats nor the video in the op reach 800GH/s. Thanks.
You still haven't posted proof that your new ASIC can get up to 800GH/s. Neither the stats nor the video in the op reach 800GH/s. Thanks.
Also you haven't changed the subject!
HashFast_CL,
You still haven't posted proof that your new ASIC can get up to 800GH/s. Neither the stats nor the video in the op reach 800GH/s. Thanks.
You still haven't posted proof that your new ASIC can get up to 800GH/s. Neither the stats nor the video in the op reach 800GH/s. Thanks.
Unless it is self-mining, Hashfast apparently has one (1) machine that might hash at 750 m/h. Let me repeat that. One.
Hashfast shipped less than a handful of practically homemade machines but tried to generate the impression that the company had a functioning assembly line. It did not. It still does not.
Hashfast shipped less than a handful of practically homemade machines but tried to generate the impression that the company had a functioning assembly line. It did not. It still does not.
"Might hash?" Are you saying the evidence was fabricated? Or did you overlook the OP, where Eligius/cgminer screenshots and video are clearly presented?
HashFast has a working assembly line at CIARA, an ISO9000 certified leader in assembling/testing/shipping high tech hardware.
HashFast demonstrated a working 2.1TH/s miner in Austin at last week's Bitcoin Conference.
Let me repeat that.
HashFast demonstrated a working 2.1TH/s miner in Austin at last week's Bitcoin Conference.
In other news, Cointerra *did not* demonstrate a working 2.1TH/s miner in Austin at last week's Bitcoin Conference, or anywhere else. Ever.
Why don't you go bother them for falsely claiming their ~400GH/s ASIC gets "greater than 500GH/s?"
Sigh. Batch 1 "sold out" instantly because it consisted of a handful of units for family and friends. Hashfast has gone full BFL.
Unless it is self-mining, Hashfast apparently has one (1) machine that might hash at 750 m/h. Let me repeat that. One.
Hashfast has overdue outstanding orders and other obligations (MPP) well into the petahashes, and more broken promises than a stadium full of politicians. Its existing customers hate the company and are suing it, but Hashfast keeps trying to find suckers to buy new equipment rather than clear its backlog.
This one machine is no more significant for Hashfast's wronged customers than its bullshit announcement that it was "shipping" on 31 December. Hashfast shipped less than a handful of practically homemade machines but tried to generate the impression that the company had a functioning assembly line. It did not. It still does not.
Only a fool would order from you.
Unless it is self-mining, Hashfast apparently has one (1) machine that might hash at 750 m/h. Let me repeat that. One.
Hashfast has overdue outstanding orders and other obligations (MPP) well into the petahashes, and more broken promises than a stadium full of politicians. Its existing customers hate the company and are suing it, but Hashfast keeps trying to find suckers to buy new equipment rather than clear its backlog.
This one machine is no more significant for Hashfast's wronged customers than its bullshit announcement that it was "shipping" on 31 December. Hashfast shipped less than a handful of practically homemade machines but tried to generate the impression that the company had a functioning assembly line. It did not. It still does not.
Only a fool would order from you.
Well to discuss the "new ASIC", I have to say results that can be verified (especially by your customers) matter more than someone on the inside of HF touting their new "super duper hasher faster 900 cepton-decillion hash/sec asic miner".
Pointless thread aside from the self-touting ego boosting comments.
Pointless thread aside from the self-touting ego boosting comments.
The spectacular performance of HashFast's EVO may be verified in several ways. You can look at the cgminer and Eligius screenshots, watch the video, and read firsthand third-party reports from the public demonstration last week in Austin.
If you haven't purchased a HashFast EVO product and have no interest in doing so, please leave this thread to those who have or may.
Batch One EVO is sold out and Batch Two EVO is selling quickly.
Why come in here and pollute a thread created for the benefit of those who disagree with your opinion? Ego boosting or what?
Good job on the Lealeana silver coins; that was a positive contribution to the BTC/LTC community.
Trying to instigate flame wars on a thread where you literally have no business is not a positive contribution.
Please go back to what you are good at (shiny things) and stop slipping into your silly old Smoothie-the-mega-troll persona.
Soooo.............hows that 800GH miner coming ?? I need more info before I purchase!!!
Well to discuss the "new ASIC", I have to say results that can be verified (especially by your customers) matter more than someone on the inside of HF touting their new "super duper hasher faster 900 cepton-decillion hash/sec asic miner".
Pointless thread aside from the self-touting ego boosting comments.
Pointless thread aside from the self-touting ego boosting comments.
HF_CL. Instead of having flame wars, why do you focus your efforts on something beneficial, like getting HF to post some kind of regular update(daily weekly update of order dates shipped/shipping) showing what order dates are shipping. Like BFL did(As much as I hate to even mention those....I'll be too nice....shall I say, shade folks). Regular updates like that will give HF far more credibility than you can ever dream of by making pointless, perhaps.. even offense... post. Show everyone proof, not excuses. If you can't see the value in that, than I don't think HF is looking for value, they are just looking for a quick payout. Which in case it isn't obvious is != to job security.
This thread is intended solely for discussion of HashFast's record-breaking new 750GH/s EVO, not rehashing every old complaint from previous threads.
Breaking records in a lab means nothing if your customers aren't getting their units.
Jump to: