The non-existence of a given belief (or claim thereof) is never proof for the existence of said belief.
This is what I have been saying all along. Since atheism is self contradictory, it doesn't really exist, and therefore certainly can't be proof for its own existence.
What's the big deal?
How can you simultaneously claim that atheism is a religion, and atheism doesn't exist? Those claims are not compatible
Please get your story straight before dictating my beliefs to me... thanks
But atheists believe atheism exists. So, they have a religion involving something that is non-existent. So, it is a religion of non-religion.