Author

Topic: Health and Religion - page 121. (Read 210900 times)

legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
March 23, 2016, 12:35:17 PM

The non-existence of a given belief (or claim thereof) is never proof for the existence of said belief.

This is what I have been saying all along. Since atheism is self contradictory, it doesn't really exist, and therefore certainly can't be proof for its own existence.

What's the big deal?

How can you simultaneously claim that atheism is a religion, and atheism doesn't exist?  Those claims are not compatible

Please get your story straight before dictating my beliefs to me... thanks

But atheists believe atheism exists. So, they have a religion involving something that is non-existent. So, it is a religion of non-religion.

Cool
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 722
March 23, 2016, 10:44:19 AM

The non-existence of a given belief (or claim thereof) is never proof for the existence of said belief.

This is what I have been saying all along. Since atheism is self contradictory, it doesn't really exist, and therefore certainly can't be proof for its own existence.

What's the big deal?

How can you simultaneously claim that atheism is a religion, and atheism doesn't exist?  Those claims are not compatible

Please get your story straight before dictating my beliefs to me... thanks
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1214
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
March 23, 2016, 05:35:27 AM
Atheism as a religion doesn't exist. They themselves create as a separate religion and make people follow it. Their statements is out of religion but now they were trying to evolve into a religion.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
March 22, 2016, 08:16:43 PM

The non-existence of a given belief (or claim thereof) is never proof for the existence of said belief.

This is what I have been saying all along. Since atheism is self contradictory, it doesn't really exist, and therefore certainly can't be proof for its own existence.

What's the big deal?

Cool
donator
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
March 22, 2016, 06:27:32 PM


No, I don't seem to be saying that dictionaries are religions. I'll write this more simply for you:

In all dictionary definitions of "religion" the vast majority are not consistent with atheist belief.

Of course, to atheists they wouldn't be. Atheist say, we not have a religion by dictionary definition. By saying this, they are showing that they have a religion by the dictionary definition. Silly atheists.

Cool

You're either not understanding or being intentionally obtuse so I'll explain for you one more time.

"Not consistent with atheist belief" means that the definition of religion includes supernatural agencies. Nearly all dictionary definitions require a belief in the supernatural in order to be a religion. Therefore nearly all definitions of religion are not consistent with atheism.



"Not consistent with atheist belief" shows atheism as a religion because of the word "belief." That word alone points out that atheism is probably a religion. When you add to "belief" the rest of the dictionary definitions of "religion," you find that atheism is either religion, or so extremely close to religion that you can't tell for a fact that it is not a religion.



Not true. Just because I believe something without being able to prove it doesn't mean I have religious beliefs about it.

As an example I believe you're a dickhead. I can't prove it, but I'm not making a religion of your dickheadedness. Further, if someone is able to prove you're *not* a dickhead, then I'll change my mind about you.

As a contrast, people with religious beliefs are unable to change their minds about their religion even in the face of opposing proof.

Now you have added the slang word "dickhead" to your personal religion. Or was it there all along and you had simply never proclaimed it before?

Keep on. The more you proclaim this and that, the firmer you make your religion... even when it is the religion of atheism... the religion of non-religion.

All of your proclamations help to fit your religion into the dictionary definition of "religion."

Cool

So your proof for the existence of something I believe is a statement from me that it is not something I believe?

Unfortunately that's not how discussion works.


If I was suggesting the proof of your faith, I could easily be wrong, because I don't know you well enough for that. It was your idea that I have proof.

The proof that everyone has religion goes beyond knowing that you have a particular kind of religion.

Cool

You don't have any kind of proof here. You didn't understand what I wrote so I'll rephrase:

The non-existence of a given belief (or claim thereof) is never proof for the existence of said belief.


hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 722
March 22, 2016, 05:57:09 PM
School board member tells atheists to ‘crawl back into their hellhole’ if they don’t like ‘Christmas break’
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/03/school-board-member-tells-atheists-to-crawl-back-into-their-hellhole-if-they-dont-like-christmas-break/

Quote
A Nebraska school board member fought a losing battle to bring back the designation “Christmas break” in place of the proposed “winter break” on the school calendar and invited atheists to “crawl back in their hellhole” if they didn’t like it...
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
March 22, 2016, 05:45:03 PM


No, I don't seem to be saying that dictionaries are religions. I'll write this more simply for you:

In all dictionary definitions of "religion" the vast majority are not consistent with atheist belief.

Of course, to atheists they wouldn't be. Atheist say, we not have a religion by dictionary definition. By saying this, they are showing that they have a religion by the dictionary definition. Silly atheists.

Cool

You're either not understanding or being intentionally obtuse so I'll explain for you one more time.

"Not consistent with atheist belief" means that the definition of religion includes supernatural agencies. Nearly all dictionary definitions require a belief in the supernatural in order to be a religion. Therefore nearly all definitions of religion are not consistent with atheism.



"Not consistent with atheist belief" shows atheism as a religion because of the word "belief." That word alone points out that atheism is probably a religion. When you add to "belief" the rest of the dictionary definitions of "religion," you find that atheism is either religion, or so extremely close to religion that you can't tell for a fact that it is not a religion.



Not true. Just because I believe something without being able to prove it doesn't mean I have religious beliefs about it.

As an example I believe you're a dickhead. I can't prove it, but I'm not making a religion of your dickheadedness. Further, if someone is able to prove you're *not* a dickhead, then I'll change my mind about you.

As a contrast, people with religious beliefs are unable to change their minds about their religion even in the face of opposing proof.

Now you have added the slang word "dickhead" to your personal religion. Or was it there all along and you had simply never proclaimed it before?

Keep on. The more you proclaim this and that, the firmer you make your religion... even when it is the religion of atheism... the religion of non-religion.

All of your proclamations help to fit your religion into the dictionary definition of "religion."

Cool

So your proof for the existence of something I believe is a statement from me that it is not something I believe?

Unfortunately that's not how discussion works.


If I was suggesting the proof of your faith, I could easily be wrong, because I don't know you well enough for that. It was your idea that I have proof.

The proof that everyone has religion goes beyond knowing that you have a particular kind of religion.

Cool
donator
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
March 22, 2016, 05:30:40 PM


No, I don't seem to be saying that dictionaries are religions. I'll write this more simply for you:

In all dictionary definitions of "religion" the vast majority are not consistent with atheist belief.

Of course, to atheists they wouldn't be. Atheist say, we not have a religion by dictionary definition. By saying this, they are showing that they have a religion by the dictionary definition. Silly atheists.

Cool

You're either not understanding or being intentionally obtuse so I'll explain for you one more time.

"Not consistent with atheist belief" means that the definition of religion includes supernatural agencies. Nearly all dictionary definitions require a belief in the supernatural in order to be a religion. Therefore nearly all definitions of religion are not consistent with atheism.



"Not consistent with atheist belief" shows atheism as a religion because of the word "belief." That word alone points out that atheism is probably a religion. When you add to "belief" the rest of the dictionary definitions of "religion," you find that atheism is either religion, or so extremely close to religion that you can't tell for a fact that it is not a religion.



Not true. Just because I believe something without being able to prove it doesn't mean I have religious beliefs about it.

As an example I believe you're a dickhead. I can't prove it, but I'm not making a religion of your dickheadedness. Further, if someone is able to prove you're *not* a dickhead, then I'll change my mind about you.

As a contrast, people with religious beliefs are unable to change their minds about their religion even in the face of opposing proof.

Now you have added the slang word "dickhead" to your personal religion. Or was it there all along and you had simply never proclaimed it before?

Keep on. The more you proclaim this and that, the firmer you make your religion... even when it is the religion of atheism... the religion of non-religion.

All of your proclamations help to fit your religion into the dictionary definition of "religion."

Cool

So your proof for the existence of something I believe is a statement from me that it is not something I believe?

Unfortunately that's not how discussion works.



hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500
March 22, 2016, 05:24:46 PM
if you believe that the physical universe is governed by causality, then there is no room for freewill in any consistent model of the universe.

Yes, I'd tend to agree with you.

But you don't need an IQ of 140 to work it out.

What is intelligence anyhow ? And how are you going to measure it ? And who decides ?

And whats any of it to do with an individual having faith ? Or believing ?

But if I were to indulge you - and your line of reasoning - I'd have to say that beyond your elite "140's" who are atheist and don't believe in free will are those of 150+ who, well, can't be sure one way or the other.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
March 22, 2016, 05:17:36 PM

i know a lot of smart people who are atheist but they really struggle with accepting that their so-called free will is illusory.

I know a lot of not smart people who know very well that free will is illusory.

Where does that leave us ?

Free will is only illusory if god exists... but, since god does not exist, your will is free from god's manipulation

The only impediment to your free will is your susceptibility to manipulation (read gullibility)

free will cannot be true because it contadicts causality. they cannot both be true. one of them must go. if you believe that the physical universe is governed by causality, then there is no room for freewill in any consistent model of the universe.

God is so extremely great, that He can allow free will while making things operate completely by cause and effect. We may not understand it easily, but we can understand how it works, basically.

Smiley
hero member
Activity: 1792
Merit: 536
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
March 22, 2016, 05:15:26 PM

i know a lot of smart people who are atheist but they really struggle with accepting that their so-called free will is illusory.

I know a lot of not smart people who know very well that free will is illusory.

Where does that leave us ?

Free will is only illusory if god exists... but, since god does not exist, your will is free from god's manipulation

The only impediment to your free will is your susceptibility to manipulation (read gullibility)

free will cannot be true because it contadicts causality. they cannot both be true. one of them must go. if you believe that the physical universe is governed by causality, then there is no room for freewill in any consistent model of the universe.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 722
March 22, 2016, 05:10:27 PM

i know a lot of smart people who are atheist but they really struggle with accepting that their so-called free will is illusory.

I know a lot of not smart people who know very well that free will is illusory.

Where does that leave us ?

Free will is only illusory if god exists... but, since god does not exist, your will is free from god's manipulation

The only impediment to your free will is your susceptibility to manipulation (read gullibility)
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
March 22, 2016, 05:04:29 PM


No, I don't seem to be saying that dictionaries are religions. I'll write this more simply for you:

In all dictionary definitions of "religion" the vast majority are not consistent with atheist belief.

Of course, to atheists they wouldn't be. Atheist say, we not have a religion by dictionary definition. By saying this, they are showing that they have a religion by the dictionary definition. Silly atheists.

Cool

You're either not understanding or being intentionally obtuse so I'll explain for you one more time.

"Not consistent with atheist belief" means that the definition of religion includes supernatural agencies. Nearly all dictionary definitions require a belief in the supernatural in order to be a religion. Therefore nearly all definitions of religion are not consistent with atheism.



"Not consistent with atheist belief" shows atheism as a religion because of the word "belief." That word alone points out that atheism is probably a religion. When you add to "belief" the rest of the dictionary definitions of "religion," you find that atheism is either religion, or so extremely close to religion that you can't tell for a fact that it is not a religion.



Not true. Just because I believe something without being able to prove it doesn't mean I have religious beliefs about it.

As an example I believe you're a dickhead. I can't prove it, but I'm not making a religion of your dickheadedness. Further, if someone is able to prove you're *not* a dickhead, then I'll change my mind about you.

As a contrast, people with religious beliefs are unable to change their minds about their religion even in the face of opposing proof.

Now you have added the slang word "dickhead" to your personal religion. Or was it there all along and you had simply never proclaimed it before?

Keep on. The more you proclaim this and that, the firmer you make your religion... even when it is the religion of atheism... the religion of non-religion.

All of your proclamations help to fit your religion into the dictionary definition of "religion."

Cool
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500
March 22, 2016, 04:34:16 PM

i know a lot of smart people who are atheist but they really struggle with accepting that their so-called free will is illusory.

I know a lot of not smart people who know very well that free will is illusory.

Where does that leave us ?
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500
March 22, 2016, 04:28:07 PM
Lol i so love this double standard silly biggotry .
hero member
Activity: 1792
Merit: 536
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
March 22, 2016, 04:21:52 PM


I particularly hate that IQ sweet spot... 125 IQ is where you find nothing but asshats and wise-asses... people who get used to being smarter than most people, and start to think they are the smartest guy on the planet (like Donald Trump)... they only seem happy, because they get a small modicum of joy out of trolling stupid people... but trolls are never truly happy

After the troll-creating sweetspot of 125 IQ, there is a break around 140 IQ, where people less troll-like, but still not happy... mostly saddened by all the ignorance and stupidity in the world, and the understanding that you can't fix stupid
[/quote]

it seems that at 125 you are smart enough to be anything but not too smart to pay the price of seeing too far. some experts say that below 150 people are still prone to conditioning. after 150 it starts to fade. but from there the torture starts to intensify. add that to the fact that you have less and lees peers of the same caliber of mind as you go to the extreme of the bell curve. people here will be less and less understood by contemporaries, family and friends.

i hear you about 140. i have seen some real life friends, acquaintances, and prominent people who seem to fall around that number. they generally dont have the misplaced confidence of the 125s but they are still vulnerable in some areas. someone said here somewhere that atheism is one of the no-brainers for smart people. if you want to segregate for intelligence, atheism will weed out most of the unintelligent. an even better segregator will be the lack of belief in free will. i know a lot of smart people who are atheist but they really struggle with accepting that their so-called free will is illusory.
donator
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
March 22, 2016, 03:32:26 PM


No, I don't seem to be saying that dictionaries are religions. I'll write this more simply for you:

In all dictionary definitions of "religion" the vast majority are not consistent with atheist belief.

Of course, to atheists they wouldn't be. Atheist say, we not have a religion by dictionary definition. By saying this, they are showing that they have a religion by the dictionary definition. Silly atheists.

Cool

You're either not understanding or being intentionally obtuse so I'll explain for you one more time.

"Not consistent with atheist belief" means that the definition of religion includes supernatural agencies. Nearly all dictionary definitions require a belief in the supernatural in order to be a religion. Therefore nearly all definitions of religion are not consistent with atheism.



"Not consistent with atheist belief" shows atheism as a religion because of the word "belief." That word alone points out that atheism is probably a religion. When you add to "belief" the rest of the dictionary definitions of "religion," you find that atheism is either religion, or so extremely close to religion that you can't tell for a fact that it is not a religion.



Not true. Just because I believe something without being able to prove it doesn't mean I have religious beliefs about it.

As an example I believe you're a dickhead. I can't prove it, but I'm not making a religion of your dickheadedness. Further, if someone is able to prove you're *not* a dickhead, then I'll change my mind about you.

As a contrast, people with religious beliefs are unable to change their minds about their religion even in the face of opposing proof.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
March 22, 2016, 02:39:58 PM
It is really a shame that you atheists waste your time on something as ridiculous as the stupidity of atheism.
Mmm, it hasn't gone unnoticed that the person who wastes the most time talking about atheism on this forum is infact.................    yourself.
And when your tired of rambling on about that, you bore everyone wasting even more time promoting this false god of yours.

You really should to get out of the house more. Would do you the world of good.

+1

I am an atheist and I don't think about atheism 1/10th as much as BADecker does...

The only time I think about atheism is when I come across some asshat talking shit about atheists...

Since I am showing you several reasons why atheism is not truth, you haven't been able to show anything but talk. So, you are proving yourself to be the thing that you seem to be calling others... others who can give a reasonable explanation where you can't seem to.

Cool
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 722
March 22, 2016, 01:49:29 PM
It is really a shame that you atheists waste your time on something as ridiculous as the stupidity of atheism.
Mmm, it hasn't gone unnoticed that the person who wastes the most time talking about atheism on this forum is infact.................    yourself.
And when your tired of rambling on about that, you bore everyone wasting even more time promoting this false god of yours.

You really should to get out of the house more. Would do you the world of good.

+1

I am an atheist and I don't think about atheism 1/10th as much as BADecker does...

The only time I think about atheism is when I come across some asshat talking shit about atheists...
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1016
March 22, 2016, 01:33:20 PM
It is really a shame that you atheists waste your time on something as ridiculous as the stupidity of atheism.

Cool
Mmm, it hasn't gone unnoticed that the person who wastes the most time talking about atheism on this forum is infact.................    yourself.
And when your tired of rambling on about that, you bore everyone wasting even more time promoting this false god of yours.

You really should to get out of the house more. Would do you the world of good.






Jump to: