Pages:
Author

Topic: Hi, guys, I (NAKOWA) was beaten. Lost 5k BTC in two days (Still UP). - page 10. (Read 12591 times)

member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
In mathematics we believe.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
In mathematics we believe.
If you can find some evidence that you were cheated then please present it.  'I can't possibly be this unlucky' doesn't really count as anything but highly circumstantial evidence.

This is exactly why I advise Dooglus to publish his algorithm, since it's truly "provably fair". If doog didn't cheat at all, what's the loss for him? I think it's the easiest way for Dooglus to prove himself clear. And, I said I wouldn't call anyone a cheater without proof.

The algorithm is published.  Under the 'Fair?' tab on the site there are a couple of third party verifier scripts.  Have you tried those?

Did you ever read this post? [EDU] Provably fair and how it can be exploited by casino owners against you. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/edu-provably-fair-and-how-it-can-be-exploited-by-casino-owners-against-you-283547
full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 100
Nakowa, you are a fraud.

If you think you have a strategy, then lets see you win even 1000BTC using 90BTC max bet.

Stop calling dooglus a cheater. The only thing that changed is the max bet lower.  The algorithm is published publicly on the 'fair' tab.

You want to sell your strategy for 111BTC but you can't because you had 2 losing sessions in a row.
legendary
Activity: 1692
Merit: 1018
If you can find some evidence that you were cheated then please present it.  'I can't possibly be this unlucky' doesn't really count as anything but highly circumstantial evidence.

This is exactly why I advise Dooglus to publish his algorithm, since it's truly "provably fair". If doog didn't cheat at all, what's the loss for him? I think it's the easiest way for Dooglus to prove himself clear. And, I said I wouldn't call anyone a cheater without proof.

The algorithm is published.  Under the 'Fair?' tab on the site there are a couple of third party verifier scripts.  Have you tried those?
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
In mathematics we believe.
If you can find some evidence that you were cheated then please present it.  'I can't possibly be this unlucky' doesn't really count as anything but highly circumstantial evidence.

This is exactly why I advise Dooglus to publish his algorithm, since it's truly "provably fair". If doog didn't cheat at all, what's the loss for him? I think it's the easiest way for Dooglus to prove himself clear. And, I said I wouldn't call anyone a cheater without proof.
sr. member
Activity: 329
Merit: 250
Nakowa can never win it back. This proves he has no 'method' or 'strategy' and only got lucky at the higher limits.

He is a fraud. He tried to sell his 'strategy' for 111BTC.  Trying to rip-off unsuspecting superstitious people.  If he really has a strategy he should still be able to win even 1000BTC at the lower limits.   

But he won't. He can't win anymore.

Yes a fraud, however don't be too sure about "can't win anymore". House edge is the same, only the variance is tighter.
legendary
Activity: 1692
Merit: 1018
While allover's losing streak tonight was rather frightening to watch (from someone who likes a bit of a gamble), I have to say it's not extraordinary.  I have stood at a French roulette wheel betting on black and lost ten times in a row.  If it was online at an unregulated gambling site I would probably be tempted to say I was cheated, but this happened at a real bricks and mortar casino.  

Allover, you are ahead on your gambling and have done well.  The best thing to do is to consider your options and strongly consider walking away a handsome winner.  Many, many gamblers have begun a losing streak and think 'I can't be this unlucky' and 'surely things can only improve from here' then gamble away all their assets and more.

If you can find some evidence that you were cheated then please present it.  'I can't possibly be this unlucky' doesn't really count as anything but highly circumstantial evidence.
full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 100
Nakowa can never win it back. This proves he has no 'method' or 'strategy' and only got lucky at the higher limits.

He is a fraud. He tried to sell his 'strategy' for 111BTC.  Trying to rip-off unsuspecting superstitious people.  If he really has a strategy he should still be able to win even 1000BTC at the lower limits.   

But he won't. He can't win anymore.
sr. member
Activity: 329
Merit: 250
It's unfair that changed the house edge without any announcement  Sad

The house edge wasn't changed.

Seems to me you should be grateful the max bet was lowered http://i.imgur.com/hL1xQ7Y.png

You would have lost even more if it had been kept at 1%
b!z
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1010
You were lucky and won 12 k btc with a small %, now you got unlucky and lost 4k with a higher %. Nothing wrong

I sincerely hope you're right.

Try to win back your BTC. It will work, don't worry
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
In mathematics we believe.
You were lucky and won 12 k btc with a small %, now you got unlucky and lost 4k with a higher %. Nothing wrong

I sincerely hope you're right.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
You were lucky and won 12 k btc with a small %, now you got unlucky and lost 4k with a higher %. Nothing wrong
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
In mathematics we believe.
b!z
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1010
Nakowa has lost. Great victory!
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
It's unfair that changed the house edge without any announcement  Sad

The house edge wasn't changed.
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
It's unfair that changed the house edge without any announcement  Sad
cp1
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
Stop using branwallets
It's silly to lower the max wager because someone gets lucky.  The math doesn't change.  The max wager should be 0.5% of bankroll for the even money bet.  Otherwise you're not maximizing your investors' profits.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
In mathematics we believe.
Do u have a bet spreadsheet that shows your bet history?

I think doog can export that for you.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
Do as I say to do--But don't. (Mind Blown)
I was beaten hard today (as "percent" on JD). During the course of my play, just-dice.com's rule changed.

1. Max profit went down to 0.25%; (CHANGED WHEN I WAS PLAYING, WHICH IS UNFAIR.)
2. (not confirmed) the house edge raised when profit is larger than 50.

(I feel) The game is completely different. I wasn't able to drag the site's profit to down -6K. I don't remember, I once did(?), but seconds later I was down dramatically. And in the end, I lost 3K, which means, with a max profit of 70, I am incapable of winning back, crystally clear.Therefore, I'm leaving JD for good, since 1) I cannot win further; 2) I've proved my points.

Allow me restate: I respect doog and his work. Doog is an upstanding guy, and his work is wonderful. What happened during last three months, is nothing personal. Once doog asked me, "You always say you respect my work, why are you trying to kill the profit of JD?" I didn't and never meant to.

IMO, a winning whale is the most effective advertisement of a casino. However, most people here would disagree. They're more happy to see a whale is hunted down, beaten hard. I played by rules, and won. (I'm still up a lot.)

From now on, I'll only talk about projects I'm involving, https://letsdice.com, for example. Hope most of you be nice to me. Thank you.

PS: About the bankroll I have, I started "gambling" on JD with 3000BTC (apart from another 4000 for investment), and never down more than 700.


UPDATED:

Quote
02:14:27 (1) so the change isn't permanent.

So, can I interpret this as: the change was made specifically for me? only because I always win (bit, and legit).  I'm somehow disappointed.


Do u have a bet spreadsheet that shows your bet history?
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
In mathematics we believe.
so Nakowa = Celeste = Towroad = guy who created letsdice?

You can say https://letsdice.com is sort of a brain child of mine. Martin and his team developed it. I invested.
Pages:
Jump to: