Topic: Homosexuality is caused by being molested - page 5. (Read 13089 times)

What social and legal advantages?  Who is denying equal rights to men?

I'd like to know what exactly are you talking about.

Women have been oppressed for as long as we have written history.  

The fact that women get pregnant and men don't isn't sexist.

It's sexist for our culture to give social and legal advantages to women while denying equal rights to men, but that's a separate discussion.

Sexist bullshit detected take caution 

At that age, did you understand that you would never be able to build a family in a monogamous relationship with another boy?

Did you have any sense that everyone else's concepts of romantic love, dating, and marriage are all based on the biological facts of where babies come from?

Chivalry, romance, and monogamy exist because women are smaller and weaker than men, and because women get pregnant.

A father protects his daughter from men who would get her pregnant and then leave her.  She needs a man to protect her from other men, because men are generally larger and stronger than her.

Then the father gives that responsibility to her husband on her wedding day, as she publicly announces that she's going to let this one man get her pregnant. And it's specifically announced at the wedding that nobody else is allowed to have sex with the bride and groom, because of where babies come from.

The father has mixed emotions about giving up his duty and trusting his daughter's safety to someone else, but he looks forward to the joy of having grandchildren.

And that is the end goal of romantic love and dating.

A father usually would see no need to give his son's protection to another man, since his son can't get pregnant and should be able to defend himself.  Some same-sex couples do imitate this mating ceremony even though they can't actually mate, but it usually involves one person pretending to be the opposite gender so people can more easily pretend that it's similar to a normal wedding.

I'll get the firewood.

I care about people too much to harm them never mind to burn them alive. 

I think religious people are insane, they need years of de-programming, most of them are harmless.

But there are those that take their religious texts too seriously and want to kill others for no reason other than what the holy text says.

I'm a humanist and anti-theist (for obvious reasons).

Take care.

I'm all for free speech.  It flushes out the crazies out of their foxholes.

It is easier to expose the nonsense they spout.  If you ban them from speaking, they will not go away.
You will not even know how many you have.

At least with free speech they have a chance (over time) to see what is wrong with their way of thinking.

Personally I wouldn't care what people say about gays, but the fact that I'm not allowed to say my opinion, that's not right at all.

I thought you agreed with Moloch

Make up your mind

LOL.  Guys let's not sink to their level.  They've been burning people alive for ages (still doing it), we are better than that.

I'll get the firewood.

Well I naturally find religion so disgusting I wanna burn religious people alive.
Now what?

So beliefs should be illegal?

You are spreading a belief that says we shouldn't be allowed the right to free speech,
and that the government should have control over our thoughts and feelings.

Your belief is hateful and offensive.

Therefore, you could be arrested under the law that you support.

Well it's not what happens in Europe ^^
Those laws were made in order to protect people and prevent them from spreading hateful beliefs.

I'm all for free speech.  It flushes out the crazies out of their foxholes.

It is easier to expose the nonsense they spout.  If you ban them from speaking, they will not go away.
You will not even know how many you have.

At least with free speech they have a chance (over time) to see what is wrong with their way of thinking.

In fact that's case in the whole world. Free speech is very American. In Europe you can get sued and get a fine for saying things like "homos are the plague of humanity".
Is it good? I don't know. It's the way things are. Free speech is not an important ideal in Europe.

In fact that's case in the whole world. Free speech is very American. In Europe you can get sued and get a fine for saying things like "homos are the plague of humanity".
Is it good? I don't know. It's the way things are. Free speech is not an important ideal in Europe.

So they can arrest you for saying your mind?
Not kicking in the heads of people, just saying your mind?
I'm not familiar with the laws there but that's just wrong.

Can you?  People want to make your disgust illegal.

I've never stopped any same-sex couples from calling themselves married, but I've been stopped from saying my opinion on countless forums, subreddits, comment sections, and in real life.

I could be arrested in Scotland for what I've posted here.
I could be denied entry to Canada.

So if you're against forbidding things, it's a complex issue.