Topic: Homosexuality is caused by being molested - page 6. (Read 13104 times)

So they can arrest you for saying your mind?
Not kicking in the heads of people, just saying your mind?
I'm not familiar with the laws there but that's just wrong.

It's about free speech.

If they can arrest you now for "hate speech" because you say something that's currently unpopular, then they could arrest you later for speaking in favor of gay marriage.  Nobody's safe.

Do Scotland and Canada love homosexuals so much?

Can you?  People want to make your disgust illegal.

I've never stopped any same-sex couples from calling themselves married, but I've been stopped from saying my opinion on countless forums, subreddits, comment sections, and in real life.

I could be arrested in Scotland for what I've posted here.
I could be denied entry to Canada.

So if you're against forbidding things, it's a complex issue.

They can have the same rights every normal human being has.
But not special rights because they are gay.
And not having special pronouns.
And certainly not getting married.

Why do you think people get married and stay together for 50 years?

You say love is something on the level of a primary school child, but it takes more than that to keep families together.

Children need their parents.  Since all babies come from sexual reproduction between one man and one woman, we have marriage so those children will have their parents.  

A pregnant woman needs someone to provide for her, so she makes the man agree that he won't be off getting other women pregnant and providing for them instead.  A man doesn't want to work every day to provide for someone else's children instead of his own, so he makes the woman agree that she won't be getting pregnant by other men.

If you know where babies come from, you can see how marriage is all about children. Even if a woman can't get pregnant, she still needs her husband to provide for her instead of sleeping around and spending his money on other women.  

Because the government started paying women to raise children away from fathers - providing for women's needs with men's tax money - we have millions of boys who grew up with no male role model.  So they act like their moms, believing that life is all about attracting a different man every week for attention and self-esteem.

Oh but that's not the problem.
It can make you vomit. I wouldn't touch another man, I find it disgusting.

The problem is not what you think of it. The problem is if you want to forbid it. The problem is if you don't want to give the same rights to homosexuals and heterosexuals ^^
Other wise you can have whatever opinion you want!

Oh, it makes perfect sense. I understand why you wouldn't get it, or didn't want to get it but still.

At that age, did you understand that you would never be able to build a family in a monogamous relationship with another boy?

Did you have any sense that everyone else's concepts of romantic love, dating, and marriage are all based on the biological facts of where babies come from?

Chivalry, romance, and monogamy exist because women are smaller and weaker than men, and because women get pregnant.

A father protects his daughter from men who would get her pregnant and then leave her.  She needs a man to protect her from other men, because men are generally larger and stronger than her.

Then the father gives that responsibility to her husband on her wedding day, as she publicly announces that she's going to let this one man get her pregnant. And it's specifically announced at the wedding that nobody else is allowed to have sex with the bride and groom, because of where babies come from.

The father has mixed emotions about giving up his duty and trusting his daughter's safety to someone else, but he looks forward to the joy of having grandchildren.

And that is the end goal of romantic love and dating.

A father usually would see no need to give his son's protection to another man, since his son can't get pregnant and should be able to defend himself.  Some same-sex couples do imitate this mating ceremony even though they can't actually mate, but it usually involves one person pretending to be the opposite gender so people can more easily pretend that it's similar to a normal wedding.

You're almost getting it.

Yes, you can argue that, but only if you argue the same against the person I was responding to.

Either all behavior is natural and therefore above moral reproach, or it's not.

Do you believe that sexual preferences are natural?  

Do you believe that homosexuals naturally find heterosexual sex disgusting?

Why do you believe that some people's sexual preferences are genetic, while other people's sexual preferences are evil religion?

Do you think you have some moral authority to condemn people's involuntary physiological reactions to sexual stimuli?

If a homosexual pornographic image gives one man an erection and makes another man vomit, why do you feel the need to call one man hateful?  

And if the image is heterosexual and makes the homosexual man vomit, why do you change your explanation from "hateful" to "natural"?

even though the bible does not explain lesbians, I think it was still inappropriate, if not explain the bible's not meant to be allowed. Be smart please

So we can argue that your "But since religion occurs naturally among humans, you shouldn't apply your moral judgements to it." is shit and we shouldn't take into account what you said no?

Good!  You're almost realizing how pointless it is to say "It's natural" as an excuse for some pet behavior while excluding other behaviors from the same logic.



Notice how I only talk about facts, logic, and science, but you respond emotionally and bring up religion instead of science.

Your personal religious beliefs don't change the facts.

 Your response doesn't follow logically, so it comes across as dogmatic programming. 

When anyone disagrees with your beliefs, for any reason, you have been brainwashed to reflexively spit out a canned answer.
 
Try thinking for yourself instead of just repeating what someone else has taught you.  You're being controlled.

Well I naturally find religion so disgusting I wanna burn religious people alive.
Now what?

But everyone has a right to live their life whether others accept it or not and to blame this on sociological conditions or as issues is wrong and unacceptable in my opinion. It does not mean that I support for same gender sex.

Don't agree with this at all.
Maybe some people who are molested could become homosexual but some who are molested ARE NOT homosexual.
Just a dumb claim.

Nobody hates lesbians, that's a myth...

Even God only hates when gay men have sex, he never says anything bad about lesbians in the bible...

Everyone loves woman on woman action... Atheist, Christian, man, woman, straight, gay, bisexual, white, black, even gods... everyone loves the lesbians!

AND YOUR NAME IS BIG MAMBA

Never really read what you had to say because your so boring..
NOW GO AND LICK YOUR MUMS SMELLY PISS FLAPS YOU INBRED LITTLE GOAT FUCKER
AND WHILES YOUR THERE GIVE YOUR DAD IF YOU KNOW WHO HE HIS A SLAP FOR BRINGING A LITTLE
PISS STREAK LIKE YOU INTO THIS WORLD

YOU BORING LITTLE TWAT WHO CARE ABOUT YOU NO ONE ..
SO GO AND TELL YOUR MUM BECAUSE WHO CARES YOU GOAT SHAGGING PISS FLAP SUCKING PIG

FUCK YOU AND DIE OF CANCER TWAT

ARRRRR I ENJOYED THAT     I LET IT RIP MAN   YEEEEEEEEEHAAAAAAAAA

SAY WHAT YOU WANT BECAUSE WHO GIVES A SHIT DICK BRAIN CUNT
BYE AND FUCK YOU FUCKERS POSTING BORING SHIT

TO ALL YOU GAY HATERS 
GO AND DIE YOU RELIGIOUS MOTHER FUCKERS

You are right. People have weird and strange fetishes in today's societies and this is just an abnormal fetish in my opinion too. Morally its wrong, its against every religion.

Let me guess, your real name is Dill Doh?