Topic: How about Vanilla coin - page 4. (Read 10190 times)

Lol. Of course not, I am laughing at you. I will not respond again to this second retard who can't seem to comprehend I have no reason to be mad because I was correct and it is hilarious that the supporters of VNL confirm their very low IQs and thus providing evidence as to why they are easily manipulated by their "John".

Well,
go rest on your couch, if you have one, I know you are sad and angry that may happen that you wont live enough to see detailed white paper from John but...
..but please, it seems you are not quite well, sit and rest and drift away think about specs and distribution of your ImagoCoin in your dream land.
I hope you’ll feel better.
  

Right, as you claim you do. So... who are you to attack someone else when you're standing on weak ground yourself?

Yeah, read Wolf0 again, you claim you are #2 and you are doing that since atleast a year on this forum.

But, hey, atleast you are giving people fun times while they laugh at you.

suuuuuuure! Which exactly were the stolen parts?  

In many ways Vanillacoin has become a testpot for a lot if not all the features people have been asking for Bitcoin to implement.  whether that is significant or not is up to each person to decide.

but being that bitcoin is having an impossible time adding something as simple as scalable blocksize, and a lightning network without handing dev control to a group of heavilly invested entrepreneurs. VNL is a great project to see how these things can work in Real time and to test out the problems(if any) with them.

If it turns out that lightning networks/zerotime can work without to much risk,(please read up on sybil attacks), or if the mixer can be shown to run anonymously, quickly, and without bloat issues, then I will consider VNL as a frontrunner in the altcoin space.

If some of these things lend up being mathematically flawed, than at least it is another testing grounds for developers like John-connor to fix and grow from.

basically VNL by having these features has proved it isnt vaporware like so many other projects, but has not proved mathematically that it isnt flawed.... of course there is no such thing as 100% anonymity in crypography, and there is probably no such thing as an impossible double spend in a zerotime transaction, but if they work well enough to allow me to use them without worries of being cheated, I am happy.

As john-connor would say, "go read the code"

He really asked smooth if John is a good coder. This is ridiculous. 


LOL 

Thanks a lot for the answer.

I haven't reviewed his code, and the obfuscation makes it hard for anyone to tell which parts are his code and which are not. The features as claimed seem worthwhile. TPTB says that his instant transaction feature is not really secure, and I don't doubt it (certainly it is true that his white papers are not detailed enough to review without digging through code). But used with caution, as with other "instant" transactions it seems potentially useful anyway.

I don't consider most of the other features particularly significant.

Nope. Hell, I didn't even mind that much, the community got me unbanned, not me. I think the way he handled "fair distribution" was heavy-handed and non-ideal, and I'm pretty sure you've talked to him, he's pretty narcissistic.

That's not to say he doesn't have skill. I'm just not drinking the kool-aid - you have to take the good with the bad.

Can I know the ability of this coder in your opinion aside from the fact he is not giving due credit to the original creators of some of the code he is using?

Are any of his features worth while and different? could any of these be of value?
Are they going to be easy for other coders to replicate?


------------------------------------
questions below directed at nobody singularly.

This is one coin that slipped past me... didn't mine it at all.

How was the initial distribution.

I love it when people doubt me. I get the last laugh.

  = my secret

Was that the drive by ban haha that was epic i will never forget

If I remember right from your reply to smooth big red leter post about john-connor in xmr thread for which you adviced him to delete it you said that dev is kind of narcissistic dictator.
Are you still feeling rekt for last year one stop ban you got from john-connor after your 'show' in vanilla IRC?

To me, it's not even that - oftentimes supporters deny it completely. I actually think there's some cool stuff in this coin - just admit the dev is kind of an asshole for violating the license and I'm happy.

Please knock yourself out trying to document anything close to that number because it doesn't fly. Already something in the neighborhood of 100s of lines of code have been specifically identified as copied and obfuscated. By inference the 99.9% number would put the size of the entire project at 100s of thousand of lines which is way off.

More likely very large portions of the code are copied, with the exception of the modifications for the new features, but it is extremely tedious to work out which ones, due to the obfuscation. I would make a large wager that it is nowhere near 99.9% however.

Again, there is nothing wrong with copying and adapting code. That is half the value of open source. The important observation here is not that code was reused, it is that VNL supporters continue to mislead about the scope and nature of the reused code, going all the way up to the top of course, but traumschiff just did it again.

Don't feed the troll, it is obvious that he has no answers just makes empty claims. You have seen that he avoids/fails to answer every single counter argument where he can't respond and simply quotes/answers single words/parts of a sentence which he in turn can attack or answer. This is the definition of an internet troll.

And to the type of question which you just asked (about a potential sollution to a problem with crypto in general) he will put an answer down pointing at his vaporware and vapor sollutions which are in works since more than a year.

Always the same, he has obvious mental issues.

Lay it on me brother...  how do you add worth to play money without centralized backing or without a mining system?