Topic: How to Choose a Good ICO - page 46. (Read 10167 times)
I think a good ICO comes from the team behind it. I always look for team first and and check the concept of their project. The concept of a project that is unique that no other major competitor is involved can be a good sign that it will succeed and I think the basic thing you need to consider is the white paper. You need to read them carefully
you can make 1 article to explain how to choose good and potential ICO and may return you more benefit 
the most important thing is the main project of ICO, did developer really build the project or just make whitepaper? you can research and ask it by joining their community. is the project make sense or not? dont abandon the track record of deloper team it self.
the most important thing is the main project of ICO, did developer really build the project or just make whitepaper? you can research and ask it by joining their community. is the project make sense or not? dont abandon the track record of deloper team it self.
determining a good ICO project is not easy. we must consider each part of their project, their team, concept, project roadmap. to help search ICO project, you can see in Icobench. there are many good ICO projects. one of which is ICO ENLTE. to know the background of the project, you can see on its website https://web.enlte.com
In essence, it's like investing in a penny stock. You have 2 choices:
1) pick one that sounds cool or your buddy recommends to you (because he thinks it sounds cool), invest a few dollars and cross your fingers for 2000x growth.
2) Just like choosing a stock, look at what fundamental differences in philosophy and technological strategy each ICO claims. Then develop a POV on what will be viable in the long term. Also take into account the team (past successes and lessons learned).
I hate to be so vague, but markets are made because people disagree and valuation is tenuous. There is no right answer. Do research, develop an opinion and have conviction in your choice. Or just ask a friend and blame him when it crashes.
1) pick one that sounds cool or your buddy recommends to you (because he thinks it sounds cool), invest a few dollars and cross your fingers for 2000x growth.
2) Just like choosing a stock, look at what fundamental differences in philosophy and technological strategy each ICO claims. Then develop a POV on what will be viable in the long term. Also take into account the team (past successes and lessons learned).
I hate to be so vague, but markets are made because people disagree and valuation is tenuous. There is no right answer. Do research, develop an opinion and have conviction in your choice. Or just ask a friend and blame him when it crashes.
Choosing the right ico isn't easy because sometimes its kind of boring to read those websites or even whitepapers, most of the people felt hassle if they read those whitepapers or any publications; unless all were business minded. One thing that made me convince for a good ico once it has been established at trading sites and the coin live launching was successful at trading sites, then it will be a good coin so its considered a good choice when you decided to buy for trading.
Hi guys, there are so many ICOs, such as those listed in https://www.coinschedule.com. It's pretty hard to review them one by one.
Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
The team - must consist of experienced men and women in the industry of cryptocurrencies. Well founded background on development. Must have a solid marketing and development team as well.
The product - must be innovative (doy) and it addresses a major problem experienced by everyone
The bounty campaign manager - must be a decorated manager. Has a clean and transparent spreadsheet. Regularly updates its participants.
I emphasize the existence of products.
Whether the content of the project matches the product.
I think it will be one of the indicators.
Because, depending on the content of the project, they do not act anything, and there are too many operations.
The projects that aim to support are viewed as SCAM.
Specific WEB systems, etc. do not need much money, so the product should be in progress.
Whether the content of the project matches the product.
I think it will be one of the indicators.
Because, depending on the content of the project, they do not act anything, and there are too many operations.
The projects that aim to support are viewed as SCAM.
Specific WEB systems, etc. do not need much money, so the product should be in progress.
Choosing a good ICO is really hard, it takes time and effort to research, specially now that there are many many scam ICOs. Be careful when selecting ICO, you should think twice and research carefully about their project and team behind the project.
It is not easy in choosing a truly legitimate ICO and can generate high profits. Given that there is always an increasing ICO here, the more we must be careful and conscientious in reading every rule and concept of ICO. Not only that, we should also pay attention to the background of the ICO was brought by whom, whether his team has the ability and good performance in handling this ICO, and whether they have experience in it. In addition, the other important thing is in the achievement of sales, ICO brought by a reliable and professional team will bring sales in the achievement of targets that have been made in a fast time.
I always try to choose a project on several punkts! First of all, the idea is most important, if you do not believe in its future, you should not invest in this project! Secondly, the size of the community. Popular projects always shoot and show good growth, so you can earn in the short term. Well, in the third, of course, the team and partners, without them no idea will develop!
It's a hard work. I check all available information from all sources. WP, fonds, team, advisers. I read some ICO ratings sites,. Linkedin, Fb, twitter, reddit if can. I seek addresses from ICO website. Once again. All that I can.
I usually check their website and collects the informations that needed in one lists. And I also check their whitepaper and their researching team to find out a good ico project.
I love to invest in High Technology, like blockchain, virtual reality, artificial intellect, drones, nanotechnologies, etc. Because I think the future is in those areas. And ico's in this industry are successful
Lately many projects have been cheatful. So choosing a good ico has become very difficult. Unfortunately, investing is quite risky and many investors no longer want to invest.
I can say that it is essential to look at the amount of money collected
I can say that it is essential to look at the amount of money collected
First thing is to check the bounty manager and project team profile, it is important to take a look at the white paper of that ico, also their involvement on social media.
Well, if you want to take a really good ICO project, you need to look up for such things as:
Presale white-list (especially without public sales - whitelist)
The type of product
Hard-cap - less then 10-20 millions $ (as for me)
Also need to look for such things as connection to other projects that have already taken good positions in cryptoworld
Check out community number
Ask people who have already got on board of this ICO about the profitability and do they have any disappointment or regret about the ICO that they have taken
Presale white-list (especially without public sales - whitelist)
The type of product
Hard-cap - less then 10-20 millions $ (as for me)
Also need to look for such things as connection to other projects that have already taken good positions in cryptoworld
Check out community number
Ask people who have already got on board of this ICO about the profitability and do they have any disappointment or regret about the ICO that they have taken
Hi guys, there are so many ICOs, such as those listed in https://www.coinschedule.com. It's pretty hard to review them one by one.
Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
I don’t think there is an easy way to figure out which ICO is really good other than researching. but there are some threads in the forum which can help you to predict the future of the projects, you can go in to search board and read them. Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
Hi guys, there are so many ICOs, such as those listed in https://www.coinschedule.com. It's pretty hard to review them one by one.
Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
Yes, I think that existing, working product, at least a prototype is significantly important for the ICO to be considered as good, because it shows us that they are already working on something. Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
I'm just working with trusted managers or reading white sheets is more difficult
It's a hard work. I check all available information from all sources. WP, fonds, team, advisers. I read some ICO ratings sites,. Linkedin, Fb, twitter, reddit if can. I seek addresses from ICO website. Once again. All that I can.
If I were in your place I would not trust the agencies that publish ratings for projects. Many write that this is not objective ratings. People say something is a lie.
I have been trying to scan for any legit option with small budget, yet I could not discover any distinctly noteworthy opportunity right now.
Jump to: