It's very hard to chose ICO but you can find information about ICO in Coin Schedule or ICOBench. Before you want to join the ICO you must get information about the project, team behind the project, roadmap and and reading a whitepaper about the project.
Topic: How to Choose a Good ICO - page 45. (Read 10167 times)
Hi everyone! I have found an amazing innovation!It is called Cryptics. It is the world’s first self-learning platform, that is analyzing the market of cryptocurrencies and generating forecasts for its participants. Moreover, they will have a giveaway and A SUPER PRIZE – Lamborghini Huracan!!!What do you think about this? Check it out!
You should go for Protocol and dApp checking for the said ICO. On which network platform it is working is the major thing to investigate. Hard-cap and no. of coins should be checked. Whitepaper should be studied for detailed information and keep your eye on the updates of that ICO.
If you are worried about exit scams try ZEEX like ico s being backed by a reputable and established company with a proven and succesfull business model you are very likely to be succesfull
Yes I agree with on the above user who said about the trustworthy of that relavant ICO team. CVProof team is full of highly qualified and reputed professionals. That's one reason why I like CVProof project.
I will say for me the way I choose my ICO is to check the project and the problem it is intended to solve, then I will check their team members and see if they already have related experience in the project they want to build then I will check the community view and opinion about the project then I will make my decision.
Man its a bit of luck as you cant keep track of all for example take GBX for example its done with minimal effort. I would recommend follow the Hero members advice and keep an open eye on various sites available.
Myself chose ICO based on its popularity. sometimes if almost all bitcointalks know it and some accounts that look trust also believe I might be in it. more by doing personal research and looking at other proffesional responses
When investing in an ICO,I always check the uniqueness of the project,what will be it's use case and most importantly the knowledge of the team.Joining their group chat and asking questions to the team is a good way to know if you are in a good ICO project..If the team members are intelligent enough and very knowledgeable about what they're doing this is a good sign that I've landed up with a good ICO.
I think that before choosing you need to immediately look at the site as it is decorated and how it generally treated.And then move on to the study of the product.Why to the first site, but because if the site is made very bad and it was not taken seriously, what already says about the project!
Sure, the way to find the best project to invest is looking the activity of project development some months after the ico. But the profit in short perspective is the smaller than if you had found and invested to project in it's beginning.
What i do is checking the ico at some ico tracking website like icobench, icotrack, coingecko etc. In that way i could check which ico has a better ranking and less risk. But make sure you must invest what are you willing to loose. That's the rule in this industry.
This is not a factor in the success of the ICO. If you focus on ratings then this is a direct way to lose your investment. Trust only yourself. Do not trust organizations that tell you that this project has a high rating - very often this is not true.I think both of you are correct. Those organizations reviews ICO but always do your own diligence and dont just rely on others opinion. Always do your own so that you will not point others if you've been scammed.
What i do is checking the ico at some ico tracking website like icobench, icotrack, coingecko etc. In that way i could check which ico has a better ranking and less risk. But make sure you must invest what are you willing to loose. That's the rule in this industry.
This is not a factor in the success of the ICO. If you focus on ratings then this is a direct way to lose your investment. Trust only yourself. Do not trust organizations that tell you that this project has a high rating - very often this is not true.
Go to www.icoguide.com this is very good comparing platform, better than others in my opinion, there are two main reasons: 1. rates are realistic 2. comparing is possible without going to each ICO - so take a look, there is also interesting blog and articles how to avoid scams.
Yes you should some research about the ICO you want and if they have a working product that could be legit also you look for websites like ICO bench it will help you.
Hi guys, there are so many ICOs, such as those listed in https://www.coinschedule.com. It's pretty hard to review them one by one. Any suggestions about choosing a good one? 
I also feel very hard to choose good ico recently since there are so many of them. I could not really know which one is good or bad.
However, i actually do research to it and one thing that will make choose them is if they have working product.
What i do is checking the ico at some ico tracking website like icobench, icotrack, coingecko etc. In that way i could check which ico has a better ranking and less risk. But make sure you must invest what are you willing to loose. That's the rule in this industry.
You should check out their website and roadmap first. Then their background and previous projects, if any. Do some research on their staff and team managers on social media. Check out community forums and comments to get more info from people who already worked with them.
Me personally when choosing good Ico is hard to know but I always make my own research like reading white paper, check the marketing strategies and lastly I always look what is the impact of the project to the community and check the manager and team developer behind this project if it is trusted
Check the whitepaper. Never underestimate the usefulness of the whitepaper to you. if the white paper is not detailed enough and does not provide any useful insight into the project, then it's most likely not good. Check the real team, ICO real project address,Total supply and all the procedure discusses
Jump to: