Currently, it is difficult to choose a good ICO for investment. Websites are for reference only and are not liable for any damages in connection with your investment decision. So be careful with your investments now.
Topic: How to Choose a Good ICO - page 8. (Read 10167 times)
Hi guys, there are so many ICOs, such as those listed in https://www.coinschedule.com. It's pretty hard to review them one by one.
Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
To choose ICO you must review it, that is the good thing to do to find a good ICO. Also if you see that the ICO have a big participants, promotions, etc. That is a good ICO for sure because many people are interested in that ICO. Also you must check the platform of the ICO, if it's unique and good.
First of all, this is to allocate time in order to fully consider the project as something very dangerous, because today you need to stop trusting projects and then, on the steps to start analyzing.
Listening to the opinions of people who have purchased the ICO is very important. The most important thing you ask is whether the deposit and purchase of coins takes place smoothly or not. Because there are several ICOs that have problems with the deposit and purchase process. The only problem is the deposit that does not enter the account and the deposit address is always changing.
It happens a lot in some bad projects and ends with bad achievements. things like this they should finish.
No way. Participation in any ICO is a risk. And even if you see great prospects for the project, a good team and large fees on pre-sales - this does not give 100% guarantee of project success and your good earnings.
you're right, man. it's not hard to understand when it's really risky. however, some people may have to turn this into an opportunity. this has always happened. there are a few of the ICOs. but they can be low volume at risk. those who take speculations can invest.
No way. Participation in any ICO is a risk. And even if you see great prospects for the project, a good team and large fees on pre-sales - this does not give 100% guarantee of project success and your good earnings.
Now it is difficult to find and choose which ICO is good and has the potential and will be profitable for the investor. The most important aspect is the crypto project team, if there is no good team, then you do not need to invest.
First of all, there are no definite formulas or elements for evaluating a potential ICO project as there are hundreds of factors influencing its success: political institutions, Law, Founder or Advisory Board, level of communication, community attention... So, other more important factors that need to be considered are: Domain Check: Registered by any company To Anonymous or not? When and how long? Community participation in the project through other media channels such as Facebook, Twitter ... how many followers, how interested?
There are many ways you can choose a good ICO project and the way I always use is to track the big sites so they can make comments on the project. If it really is potential I will definitely invest in that project
Carefully study the team, check their reality in social networks, the significance of the coin for society. And remember most of the projects are scam.
The first thing to look at for whether it's a good ICO or not is through their bounty campaign because a good ICO hires good bounty campaign manager that poses higher forum rank like hero or legendary member otherwise not so good ICOs are being managed by newbies and junior members only
There are many factors and of course between ICO with each other is different. There is no definite benchmark. It could be an ICO has a good concept and a good team but in progress it turns out it is a scam. If you have experience in ICO certainly the ability to analyze is increasing. At least you can see an earlier ICO project with the same team whether successful or not.
Unfortunately, very rarely the same team having the experience of successful ICO launches new projects. If this happens, then all investments are made by large funds and there is no room for investing ordinary people.
Listening to the opinions of people who have purchased the ICO is very important. The most important thing you ask is whether the deposit and purchase of coins takes place smoothly or not. Because there are several ICOs that have problems with the deposit and purchase process. The only problem is the deposit that does not enter the account and the deposit address is always changing.
You can choose good ico if you spend more and more time in market analysis and gather knowledge about crypto.
Hi guys, there are so many ICOs, such as those listed in https://www.coinschedule.com. It's pretty hard to review them one by one.
Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
Checking the legitimacy of an ICO is quite tricky and from my experience Scam ICO's are too hard to tell. Some schemers are too careful and too good at what they do in deceiving people you'll never know anything about it until it is already too late.
There are common guidelines but im not really sure if that will help.
First on the list is check their website and their product. Check the number of their own community. Their participants and investors that are already part of the project. The level of significance of their project and its demand level, Their goals and road map.
A lot of factors to consider in choosing a good ICO. You have to make sure that the people behind the ICO's project are the real ones and not just hiding their identities into somebody else's profile. Credibility and experience in their respected fields are necessary for handling a big project that needs continuous developments, innovations and upgrading. The project should have many users and a clear view of how the users will benefit from it.
There are many factors and of course between ICO with each other is different. There is no definite benchmark. It could be an ICO has a good concept and a good team but in progress it turns out it is a scam. If you have experience in ICO certainly the ability to analyze is increasing. At least you can see an earlier ICO project with the same team whether successful or not.
It's so hard to choose what ICO you are joining for. I suggest you review first the ICO you are joining. Check out their website, social media pages and also what is their platform. Here is one ICO that I have a good review. Check https://www.swachhcoin.com. They do have a very nice platform for waste management. They will give monetary incentives to their users to manage their waste properly. whereas, traditionally people used to pay for their waste to be collected at home. Their token sale is also live now and it's almost 41% remaining before they reach their hardcap. The success of this project is very near. So I suggest you also take a review on this project.
First of all, become sure that it is not a scam and your time and money will not be wasted. After it find the information about the project like a white paper and check it.
For you to be able to get a good ICO. You have to research on this site icodrops and get a better review on how it's being rated and the price involve. And also when checking on good ICO try and know their stakes and percentage being giving out as token to their participants
Jump to: