Topic: How to choose the right ICO? - page 14. (Read 7891 times)

It is very important to study the "white paper" in sufficient detail. Unfortunately, many investors do not find for this time, although it is there that everything you need to know about a particular ICO is located. Compare the content of the "white book" and what you found in other sources. Then ask yourself: what value does this project bring to the world?

To select a good ICO, you first need to understand the ICO campaign. After analyzing the ICO campaign and referring to the web site overview, you need to decide whether the ICO development team is reliable?

First of all it is worth checking rating on various websites, it is the best of all if this rating is the computer work, because voices and opinions of people are very often just bought.
Then it is worth checking what team or the person stands behind this project, most often all this information can be found in the Internet.
Reading whitepepper and the decision to enter ico will be the following stage which I advise to you. Very often projects are repeated each other and it is necessary to find the alternative project and to understand why this project is better
Well and as practice best of all shows a blockchain projects are on sale. Good luck

As for me, the first is the idea of the project, then you need to study the team and the road map , well, you always need to remember that investing in cryptocurrencies is very risky!

Bitconnect and other ponzi schemes had great whitepapers.

Is a whitepaper a legal document?

Is a whitepaper even remotely based on reality?

A Whitepaper could be written by a very talented writer that is full of promises of things that they have no ability to do or sweeping generalizations of decentralized this and that.

A team would need to be verified and not just some pictures of cool looking millenial programmers and VC guys.

What have they made?  That is what you can verify?  Is it something someone can actually use?  Is it legit?  Does it have any real world use or problem solving?

To tell people that they just need a nice Whitepaper and a good looking team is in my humble opinion a failed investment approach.

There are also projects that pay money to some "name" in the blockchain world to say he is an "Advisor" on their project to give their project credibility.  They do it in Hollywood, they do it on Wallstreet, and they do it in ICO's.  Do you think the 100 projects a certain someone is associated with is actually being advised by that person?

What have they made?  Is that verifiable?  Is it being used?  Or did they just post some open source somewhere?

Do they have contacts and the ability within whatever industry that they say they are in to solve the problem they are attempting to solve?  That might be a better question than wanting pictures of programmers.  So many tokens don't need people with blockchain experience, they need people with industry experience.  Unless they are making a new blockchain technology, I would rather take a group that knows about the industry they are in and 90% of ICO's are not attesting to be making new blockchain technology but using current platforms and protocols to make something new for the actual public to use.

I would rather look for the next Uber or Amazon that utilizes already made tech for real life use than trying to find the next Ethereum.   

Just a humble opinion, but what do I know.

mainstream ICO like lending ICO bitconnect , regal , hextra and another
so be carefull some ICO will scam just see team , roadmap , whitepaper

Here is a novel idea.

Have they created anything?  Will they create something in my lifetime? Are they really doing something new or is it a pipedream?  Not "they aim" to create something.  Have they actually created something that could have value?  Or is it another "idea" with the words Decentralized, Protocol, Blockchain and Infrastructure in it.  

It doesn't have to be high tech for it to be viable.  It needs to actually be something, anything.  Then maybe you can establish a value.

i prefer to evaluate them on some form of the following. Note to newbies: also always be careful to follow instructions clearly, including whether they accept btc or just eth, and not to send eth/btc from an exchange etc.

Hype:
twitter users
reddit posts
telegram members
discord members
responsiveness/truthfulness of moderators in these channels
   
Fundamentals:   
Availability of MVP
Team strength (number of experts in the field; linkedin profiles)   
Whitepaper originality/technicality/clarity   
Independent reviews   
Partnerships with corporates/academia   
Use-case strength   
Clarity of roadmap

Others:   
Existing Competition (other coins in the same space? how established are they)   
Regulation Risk (does it have security characteristics?)   
Hardcap (is it asking for too much money for its use case?)
Share of tokens distributed (are the founders/team keeping too much for themselves, escrow?)

I think many factors r considered to choose the right ICO projects. Firstly reading the WP carefully is a must, then u have to check its team and visit their profiles to see if they r really experienced or not. Also the concept of the project, and its roadmap are another signs showing u if the project is going to success or not.

We have different prediction and  for we have opinions about how to know if they have possible to become successful the ICO. This my requirements if it's good ICO . The unique or the difference of other project and the purpose of investing to the project . But even its potential ICO they have chance to become failed once they not reach target hard cap..

I think to choose the correct ico by looking at the vision and mission of an ICO. See Ambit mining ICO https://ambitmining.io

I think is from the team, because most there recent projects were successful so if someone have known so team they can easily partake of the project. Although sometimes roadmap also matters if they are inline with what is written on the roadmap that shows that the project will be successful too.

To choose the right ICO for investment, you need to study at least  three sites with ICO ratings. On such portals  the audit of the project is already done for you!

Hi My Friend, The Right ICO Is Flogmall. I invested in this project and believe in it

How to choose the right ICO look at his Web project and see his teamwork

The above mentioned are the some of the reason to find the best project, yes we have to check all possible ways to determine how potential the project is going to be. We have to consider some specific factors about the team and their ability.

I support these ideas, especially the question if it is feasible, otherwise you are already on the way to not have a good ICO

I believe, it is not just one criteria that we have to look into but many, to be honest. We have to see the overall picture.

I believe there are some important things one must look out for before choosing to join an ICO. Amongst them are good whitepaper and a clear roadmap. Correct marketing strategies and the team behind the project should be adequately considered. I found all these elements in Ambit Mining ICO https://ambitmining.io, One should really look on to it.

The key to successful ICO is that you must join a good ICO project.
Do not just choose the ICO project, but you should research the best existing ICO so you can feel the ICO that has good potential.
Your choice of ICO should pay attention to its TEAM whether the ICO project consists of a professional TIM or not.
This greatly affects ICO results because a good team will produce a successful project.