I generally see the following points while choosing an ICO.
1)Team and their experience
2)Social influence of the ICO
3)What type of decentralized solution they provide and if it is explained clearly in the white paper
4)Engagement of the project over social platforms
Topic: How to choose the right ICO? - page 10. (Read 7891 times)
For me the team is the most integral part of an ICO, if the team ks lousy and doesn't cooperated with the community, the roadmap and the whitepaper will not be followed or will just be disregarded, the team should also have good qualities and is compose of devs, marketing strategies, campaign managers, support team, in order for the ICO to run, and also if one member of the team decided to quit, there is already someone who knows what they are doing and can easily replace them. The roadmap and whitepaper are also integral parts, however without a good team, is will be useless, though it is a very good one.
Always research for their team, whitepaper and their roadmap. Research who are they and look if they have a good project that can really help in the near future.
And Also The Maximum Supply! my Brother
and do not forget the marketing and advertising team must have good performance including bounty management.
Maybe by trying to investigate the team. How much experience they have, where, in what, why they are trying to build ICO and go on the Market, are they going to achieve something or just trying to close your eyes. Can you find these people on Internet, Facebook, LinkedIn. That would tell you very enough.
Find right ICO is not that simple. Firstly look at the team, estimate their experience and check their Linkedin. Then move to web site, quality really matter. Another point to consider is community, how big is it. Don't forget about ratings .
Understanding the projects to be embarked on is very necessary. Read the whitepaper of their company taking note of their road maps.
When we invest on Ico we should must check Their
1. Team
2. Roadmap
3. WhitePaper
4. Website design
5. Their Promoting
6. Social media Popularity
7. Check Ratings
Airdropalert.com
Icobench.com
Icoreview.site
1. Team
2. Roadmap
3. WhitePaper
4. Website design
5. Their Promoting
6. Social media Popularity
7. Check Ratings
Airdropalert.com
Icobench.com
Icoreview.site
I choose a good ICO on several factors. The team must have open LinkedIn profiles.
I always look if the project has a working business. Plus the presence of serious partners.
I always look if the project has a working business. Plus the presence of serious partners.
It is best to see the team including advisors. But I chose to look at the hype because it takes good analysis to see a good team.
When investing in an ICO, it is important to identify the core features of a project that differentiate it from the endless sea of cloned coins (alt-coins), one should look to avoid investing in an ICO which is too similar to an established project.
Honestly, I think the most important thing is to do your own thorough due diligence. In the crypto space right now, there's so many project coming up every single hour. There are many cash-grabbing projects (those who are just in for the quick buck, but under-deliver). However, there are also a number of very good ICO projects. Personally, I think people should inspect every part of the project and research yourself first before investing in a project. Do not do it just for a quick buck. More often than not, if the project promises to provide you regular periodic earnings and it sounds too good to be true, it is probably too good to be true. Do your homework lads!
I think the most important thing of project is team of course. Strong team and good advisors are my recomend for all participants of ICO. Good concept doesn`t mean success of project, but there a lot of such project that will be scam.
This is a dangerous choice. But it will make you rich if ICO succeeds. So better to do extensive research first before making an investment in ICO's. Do your own research and look at everything from the team, developers, site, whitepaper and ask yourself if this coin actually serves a purpose.
Even though we research a lot about the company and their stability but still, they are not developing on time to release the product. We have to research about the development person in order whether he has ability to progress the project further after the crowd sale.
We have different prediction and for we have opinions about how to know if they have possible to become successful the ICO. This my requirements if it's good ICO . The unique or the difference of other project and the purpose of investing to the project . But even its potential ICO they have chance to become failed once they not reach target hard cap..
All ico have chance to fail in gaining hard cap during token sale though the project has great idea and unique which is the first project. However its plus value of the project become successfully. All complete good team, great idea and good advertising would be the best choice would be.
This is a dangerous choice. But it will make you rich if ICO succeeds. So better to do extensive research first before making an investment in ICO's. Do your own research and look at everything from the team, developers, site, whitepaper and ask yourself if this coin actually serves a purpose.
This is probably the most frequently asked question in the crypt. I think it's very difficult to find a project. Personally, I choose ISO for a long time, not less than a week.
I think all these moments are important. It is necessary to check everything as much as possible. In addition, I recommend that you attend the event at which the project team will be represented and talk with them personally. So I get acquainted with Luckchemy, and I am sure in this people.
One of the main mistakes of many investors is that they do not study the "white paper", they do not even know in general what the idea of the project they want to invest in. Unfortunately, many investors at the moment do not find, although there is everything you need to know about a specific ICO. The second mistake is not studying the team that creates this project, the publicity of the team, the participation of these people in the conferences. As a result, investors send their money to a frank scam and do not receive any profit.
I can say that cool cousin will do. Cool cousin is a vc-backed travel company launched in 2016, with a thriving global community in over 60 cities. Crowned by the new york times, l.a times, the guardian and as a “must app for travelers”
Depending on the project ico you want to participate in development on what: services, production, ...
Assess the potential of the project
Development team is good?
Developed on which platform? Who are the potential customers?
How is the roadmap? Is there a roadmap or not?
Are they interested in investors?
That's just my personal opinion
Good luck
If you evaluate the project well, potential long term, then it is a profit
Also you can refer to some ico evaluation sites like
https://icorating.com/
https://icotracker.net/
https://icoreview.site/
https://icobench.com/
Assess the potential of the project
Development team is good?
Developed on which platform? Who are the potential customers?
How is the roadmap? Is there a roadmap or not?
Are they interested in investors?
That's just my personal opinion
Good luck
If you evaluate the project well, potential long term, then it is a profit
Also you can refer to some ico evaluation sites like
https://icorating.com/
https://icotracker.net/
https://icoreview.site/
https://icobench.com/
Jump to: