Topic: How to choose the right ICO? - page 25. (Read 7911 times)
It is extremely difficult to choose a prospective ISO project. Because many projects are not implemented because of conflicts or differences of developers.
cryptocurrency news site Bitcoin.com has surveyed last year’s ICOs and found that of 902 tracked by TokenData, 142 failed before raising funding, and another 276 failed after fundraising.
That’s a 46% failure rate — but wait, there’s more. Bitcoin.com found another 113 projects that it calls “semi-failed,” because their teams have gone off the radar or their community has withered away. Add those, and the failure rate jumps to 59%.
That’s a 46% failure rate — but wait, there’s more. Bitcoin.com found another 113 projects that it calls “semi-failed,” because their teams have gone off the radar or their community has withered away. Add those, and the failure rate jumps to 59%.
where the find good team any site ?
If they are dealing with a problem instead of creating a problem I look. If the team behind the project have excellent experience I look closer. If the leader of the ICO has experience taking previous companies from beta stage successful I look I sit up and take notice. And with all of these if they have partnerships and solid advisors I'll begin to contemplate an investment
Maybe by trying to investigate the team. How much experience they have, where, in what, why they are trying to build ICO and go on the Market, are they going to achieve something or just trying to close your eyes. Can you find these people on Internet, Facebook, LinkedIn. That would tell you very enough.
ICO can be successful if the funds collected can achieve the specified targets and the participation of the team that supports ICO
For that what are the measures we have to take in order to participate in the ICO, collecting fund it is not enough because whether they are prompt in developing the roadmap or not we have to check before investing? Now there are many ICO making the good amount of investment but when it comes to real-time development they are failing to make because there is no technical person for developing those.
It's like investing. Everyone has different investment reasons. Even few masters can make every investment.
Compatible group behind the venture, Good whitepaper with detail guide, Advisory board with some expereienced individuals, Backed by some enrolled organization and which are good to go for quite a long time. Very low softcap and hardcap with the goal that financial specialists need to purchase tokens in the wake of posting instead of amid ICO.
You need to peruse painstakingly the ICO's whitepapers and their guides, and furthermore you have to check the group behind the venture and ensure on the off chance that they are genuine individuals with great learning and experience about such undertakings or not, on the grounds that there are such huge numbers of phony groups behind trick ICOs.
You need to peruse painstakingly the ICO's whitepapers and their guides, and furthermore you have to check the group behind the venture and ensure on the off chance that they are genuine individuals with great learning and experience about such undertakings or not, on the grounds that there are such huge numbers of phony groups behind trick ICOs.
In this crypto ICO boom time, it can be hard to choose the right coin or token to buy and invest, for me main things are project idea, social activities, team and road map...
I think after the question regarding the existence of Nakamoto this is the second toughest question we have here. Finding a right ICO is a myth I think. There is nothing like a right ICO perhaps you can find the one that suits you the most. The parameters which I look for is a good reputation and a small cap target which is achievable practically. I found it with VLB ICO. They have stood against odds and enjoy a great reputation. Apart from Reputation look for teams credibility too and their past experiences.
This subject rose already repeatedly and all have agreed on the answer that the choice is a komleksny concept and one shouldn't look on something, there are also companies which collect the huge sums out of the blue
As for me, I always conduct a comprehensive analysis. Here are some of the parameters that I pay special attention to:
1. Number of people in the team
2. Who are the advisors
3. How many tokens are created
4. Technical documentation
5. When the site and social networks were created
6. Activity in social networks
There are more parameters, but they are the most basic.
Crypto market is emerging and by making the right choice, we can make real good $$$'s. What are the key for a ICO to be successful?
Add additional options if I miss in the voting options
Add additional options if I miss in the voting options
With cohesiveness and team support, the possibilities of ICO can be a success, but we must know the team first with experienced ones.
Hi there! hard to say exactly as that is a tricky issue. To me, you need to go off of several points that are: a team, wp, real business experience, projected profitability backed up with the well-equipped base.
A group of professional advisors. In case the team have experience in similar projects, there's a good chance, the whole ico will be successful.
A well-structed WP which speaks for itself. Anyone needs to understand what they are investing in,right?
I found the connection to real business to be important,too. Finally, it's a low soft or hard cap which is to me gives more chances for success
Someone mentioned VLB eariler here, which is a great example of a trust-worthy ICO. At first I leant towards a strong team of advisors
(IBM, QIWI, cool right?), but then I learned from their whitepaper that the soft cap is $4M n hard cap $12 and decided to invest. The reviews're very promising!
A group of professional advisors. In case the team have experience in similar projects, there's a good chance, the whole ico will be successful.
A well-structed WP which speaks for itself. Anyone needs to understand what they are investing in,right?
I found the connection to real business to be important,too. Finally, it's a low soft or hard cap which is to me gives more chances for success
Someone mentioned VLB eariler here, which is a great example of a trust-worthy ICO. At first I leant towards a strong team of advisors
(IBM, QIWI, cool right?), but then I learned from their whitepaper that the soft cap is $4M n hard cap $12 and decided to invest. The reviews're very promising!
This subject rose already repeatedly and all have agreed on the answer that the choice is a komleksny concept and one shouldn't look on something, there are also companies which collect the huge sums out of the blue
ICO POOLING GROUP OPEN (No entry fee)
We actively make deals with ICOs we believe have good potential base on our research to get bonuses/discounts comparable to ICO private presale levels. We also do sub-pools with leading influencers in the field. Minimum investment amount for our usual deals is as low as 0.1 eth. Members are encouraged to do their own research and will have the freedom to choose whether to join in a particular deal.
Our group differs from others pooling groups:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
***LATEST ANNOUNCEMENT***:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anyone interested feel free to join our telegram chat via the link below:
Discord Channel: https://discord.gg/MzZjmDF
Telegram Group: https://t.me/joinchat/Crr1mRD6xamwhGc-VGptEg
Telegram Announcement Channel: https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAE3rzgN3efmggGiuFQ
Happy hunting:)
Shark's Pool Team
We actively make deals with ICOs we believe have good potential base on our research to get bonuses/discounts comparable to ICO private presale levels. We also do sub-pools with leading influencers in the field. Minimum investment amount for our usual deals is as low as 0.1 eth. Members are encouraged to do their own research and will have the freedom to choose whether to join in a particular deal.
Our group differs from others pooling groups:
- We have a splendid track record - the SPREADSHEET of our PAST DEALS IS AVAILABLE in our groups for your reference.
- We have a DEDICATED AND COMMITTED TEAM of 10+ ADMINS researching on prospective ICOs daily - we DO AMAs WITH ICO DEVELOPMENT TEAMS ourselves before deciding to go forward with the deal.
- We roll out good deals on an active basis.
- We never cut your bonuses from the back end (e.g. the operator got a 50% bonus offer but only telling the grp for 25%).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
***LATEST ANNOUNCEMENT***:
- We are delighted to announce that our IOLITE POOL is OPEN for contribution - for 24 HOURS.
- We are also delighted to announce that we have SUCCESSFULLY SENT OUT 2 POOLS - i.e. our IGNITE RATINGS and NEXO POOL; in aggregate, that accounts for our 11th POOL SENT.
- Thank you for all your support!!- we have SUCCESSFULLY POOLED FOR 100+ ETH for our NEXO POOL and that accounts for our 2nd100+ ETH DEAL. (Please be informed that due to overwhelming interests and the urgency of the deal, our Nexo pool has not been previously announced on this thread after we announce we ran a pledge for it)
- The SPREADSHEET of our past deals is AVAILABLE in our groups for your reference.
- We welcome suggestions on any good ICOs our members are interested in and we will try our very best to make the deal happen for those which found great enthusiasm among our members - do join our discussion in our group and make suggestions!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anyone interested feel free to join our telegram chat via the link below:
Discord Channel: https://discord.gg/MzZjmDF
Telegram Group: https://t.me/joinchat/Crr1mRD6xamwhGc-VGptEg
Telegram Announcement Channel: https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAE3rzgN3efmggGiuFQ
Happy hunting:)
Shark's Pool Team
Hey, will you delete this post of yours, it's off-topic I think. Or you may copy it and start a new topic/thread here, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=post;board=161.0
Your Subject would be, ICO POOLING GROUP OPEN (No entry fee)
Sorry, I tried to PM you but can't as I was not allowed for some reasons maybe. Good luck.
Crypto market is emerging and by making the right choice, we can make real good $$$'s. What are the key for a ICO to be successful?
Add additional options if I miss in the voting options
Add additional options if I miss in the voting options
How about adding Smart Contracts? I've read and found this post interesting, Developer’s advices to ICO investor here I quote the OP for everyone to read...
Quote
Hello, dear investors and everyone who reads this.
Being a developer of smart contracts, I cannot stand aside of the current lawlessness in the ICO market.
Out of every 100 projects 99 is a fraud, or a scam, as we used to call it.
Please, read the following advices as a guide to verification of every ICO:
1. At the start of pre-ICO team should have a contract for automatic assets transfer, that contains a written set of rules for early investors – not on towel, not in the speaking form, but written in the smart-contract. Otherwise, collected assets can just fall in the pockets of founders, or they can change rules of the game in the middle of act – there are many examples.
2. The contract for pre-ICO should be a part of a bigger contract on ICO and do not be different tokens – it is unsafe form a standpoint of vulnerability and withdrawal of funds.
3. The contract for pre-ICO, and then on ICO should have a lower and upper barrier - if it does not – the team does not know what it wants - just a scam.
4. The contract for ICO should have escrow of the funds, received as a result of placement - it can be a frieze or multiSig with a voting condition. This will give you a guarantee against the expenditure of funds earlier than the team completed the previous stage.
5. The contract should have indisputable return of funds condition, in case of not reaching the lower limit of the collected pool. It is in the contract and not in the white book, if it is not – move on, it’s just a scum.
6. All contracts must be posted on GitHub, this will enable third-party developers to check the contract for the vulnerability, if the team has not taken care and before the ICO has not posted a bounty on the vulnerability.
7. The contract must specify the conditions for the team and for the bounty’s for vulnerability.
8. The contract must specify the conditions for not traded tokens - with clearly defined deadlines.
This post is about having a standard. Everything in the end should have a standard - and together we can achieve it. If you do not invest in teams that do not adhere to basic security standards - they just won’t be able to steal your money.
I hope for a dialogue and a healthy discussion.
Being a developer of smart contracts, I cannot stand aside of the current lawlessness in the ICO market.
Out of every 100 projects 99 is a fraud, or a scam, as we used to call it.
Please, read the following advices as a guide to verification of every ICO:
1. At the start of pre-ICO team should have a contract for automatic assets transfer, that contains a written set of rules for early investors – not on towel, not in the speaking form, but written in the smart-contract. Otherwise, collected assets can just fall in the pockets of founders, or they can change rules of the game in the middle of act – there are many examples.
2. The contract for pre-ICO should be a part of a bigger contract on ICO and do not be different tokens – it is unsafe form a standpoint of vulnerability and withdrawal of funds.
3. The contract for pre-ICO, and then on ICO should have a lower and upper barrier - if it does not – the team does not know what it wants - just a scam.
4. The contract for ICO should have escrow of the funds, received as a result of placement - it can be a frieze or multiSig with a voting condition. This will give you a guarantee against the expenditure of funds earlier than the team completed the previous stage.
5. The contract should have indisputable return of funds condition, in case of not reaching the lower limit of the collected pool. It is in the contract and not in the white book, if it is not – move on, it’s just a scum.
6. All contracts must be posted on GitHub, this will enable third-party developers to check the contract for the vulnerability, if the team has not taken care and before the ICO has not posted a bounty on the vulnerability.
7. The contract must specify the conditions for the team and for the bounty’s for vulnerability.
8. The contract must specify the conditions for not traded tokens - with clearly defined deadlines.
This post is about having a standard. Everything in the end should have a standard - and together we can achieve it. If you do not invest in teams that do not adhere to basic security standards - they just won’t be able to steal your money.
I hope for a dialogue and a healthy discussion.
Well, it's not easy to choose Right ICO if you are a newbie in investing, but the very best way to choose right ICO is to check the team's background especialy to the founders to the lowest, and of course check the Project if it is Realistic don't just invest into a nonsense Project with High caps because surely it will be scam. A GOOD Right ICO is like VLB. Solid Team, Trustworthy Team and a Realistic Project, A Token use for utility. If you are interested kindly check their website vlb.io and read the whitepaper and do some research about how the team is Really a Good Team but don't be late to their Presale for Coming ICO.
The ICO may be the initially to have good support. Haven't started bringing in a bunch of people yet. But I often came across ICO that 6 and 7 weeks took a good popularity! Enough if the project will have a good team, or someone propiarit in the form of a major personality in crypto feast or financial market! This gives good support to the project. Pay attention to the projects that are associated with technical innovations! Usually such as WePower or Restart Energia are very well collected))
Crypto market is emerging and by making the right choice, we can make real good $$$'s. What are the key for a ICO to be successful?
Add additional options if I miss in the voting options
Add additional options if I miss in the voting options
HYPE and Marketing is everything. you can have a good product without marketing it will not be sold out
If built by an experienced team, the chances of success are high
Jump to: