Good Day Everyone,
Well, I know a lot of bounty hunters are frustrated and worn out mostly because most of the projects which they'd spent their precious time promoting ended up being scam projects. But hey, its too late to give up at this time, trust me.
So here are the little tips which I personally apply before participating in any bounty campaign, though, of course, it takes time, I feel its worth it.
1. THE TEAM BEHIND THE PROJECT
2. THE SOFT CAP AND HARD CAP (HOW REASONABLE IS IT?)
3. HAVE THEY RAISED ANY FUNDS BEFORE COMING PUBLIC?
4. ARE THEY PLANNING AN ICO, STO, OR IEO? IF IEO, THEN ON WHAT EXCHANGE?
5. WHO IS THE BOUNTY MANAGER? WHAT IS HIS TRUST LEVEL ON BITCOINTALK? WHAT IS THE SUCCESS RATE OF THE CAMPAIGNS HE HAD MANAGED? AND SO ON.
FEEL FREE TO ADD YOUR OPINIONS BELOW, I MIGHT JUST LEARN A THING OR TWO
Can you give me some bounty list that you joined now I want to participate in bounty
Check the bounty campaigns board of the forum and you will see plenty of the good bounty threads. Later check the stated steps and find the bounty campaign that suits your needs related to your forum rank. Learning as a bounty hunter requires to analyze the teams, projects before accepting the decision of joining any bounty. Reward distribution shouldn't be a year after the end of bounty and be careful about the shady bounty campaigns.
the most important thing, in my opinion, is the team and the whitepaper. I've seen a lot in this forum about whitepaper counterfeiting. From the whitepaper, you can see all the explanations about the bounty/project, whether impressed fraud or not.
Whitepapper is not enough. The information provided on the whitepaper is what the team want the outside world to see. Most important is the partnership, how far are they Close to fundraising goals because technically the success also depends on amount raised to develop the product. You can check expert opinions and reviews too but there are paid reviews these days
Having a decent whitepaper will show the project a strict, legit project, it is like a business plan. Information provided by the ICO reviewers and experts is not coming from the proper analysis, as you explained those reviews are paid in hand with the allocated token in order to get the good scores. Success is not entirely arranged with the fundraising goals, by the way.