Topic: How to self exclude from anonymous gambling sites - page 27. (Read 6797 times)

It is possible to exclude yourself in the way OP said, but unfortunately, as OP said, you cannot use stable coins to distance yourself from the risk of fluctuating crypto prices.
In my opinion, whatever method a person uses to exclude themselves is very good, but it all comes back to the desire and commitment of each gambler because it would be in vain if a gambler staked the budget he has because if his mind still has the desire to gamble, of course he has other methods such as tried to gamble, borrowed a little money from a friend and gambled secretly.
A strong desire is an important role for gamblers who want to reduce their gambling activities so that in any way gamblers can very easily limit themselves so that they get into the habit of not gambling too often.

It is silly enough. You can get KYC when you need your money fast and wait for a week or even a month until you KYC. You can get some problems with KYC and just lose all your money. The best way is to initiate KYC by yourself if it is possible. Of course if you want to gamble in this casino for a long time and you don`t plan to cheat.

Self exclusion feature is indeed that available on some platforms but some dont really have on which means you would really be needing to do it externally on which it would really be just that depending
on how you would really be that making yourself taking up such step on which those options you had mentioned are indeed other ways on making yourself that be able to avoid those potential
impulsive gambling activity on which if you are really that mindful about on quitting gambling or having some break then it would really be just that normal that you would be serious on doing it.
On the time that you do find yourself be dealing again with gambling just because you had bypassed those restrictions or really finding up way for you to play no matter what
then its a solid indication that you are already addicted into it.

    I think it’s all left for the person to decide what he want to become, we all have choices to make in whatever we do. It’s that self discipline that makes one more coordinated than the other. Why will we want gambling to take control of us when we are the one to be in control instead. People can actually fight through this gambling addiction, with just self discipline and control any body can beat addiction.  Your idea is very much valid too because even the Bible says if the right hand is causing you to sin, caught it off. Cutting off your engagement with anything associated to gambling is one way help in controlling gambling addiction.
   Freezing up funds in site is not really enough, because if you really want to cut down habit, you shouldn’t be having money in your gambling sites. You can use the money for other things, if you want to stay off gambling, stay off for good. Keeping the money there can really be tempting to begin gambling again. Best thing to do for yourself to prevent spending more time in gambling site, is to delete the site from your device. This is a really a great step in dealing with addiction.  Nothing is impossible for sure, we can also be better and do better. We just need to be true to ourselves.

Allow me to say a few words about this problem.  And this is one of the global problems, namely the possibility of anonymous payments in cryptocurrency.  And this, of course, concerns the interests of millions of gambling and casino players around the world.  These players may have many reasons why it is vital for them to remain anonymous.  These reasons can be of a family nature, or concealment of information from the employer, or national prohibitions on gambling.  And now the implementation of KYC everywhere deprives such players of the opportunity to gamble.
 And the theses of my posts, including here on the forum, briefly consist in the fact that humanity as a whole has already matured to the full legalization of the possibility of anonymous payments and finally a jurisdiction similar to at least Curacao should appear, which will issue licenses on completely legal grounds  for the activities of crypto casinos with a 100% guarantee of no KYC under any circumstances, including, of course, when paying out big winnings to happy players.  I think that such a casino can not only arouse interest among cryptocurrency owners, but even become very popular, even cause some excitement in a good sense. 
Unfortunately, everyone is still afraid of USA hegemony in such licensing issues.
 But, obviously, the world is changing and soon many countries will not give a damn about this fact.  Then such jurisdiction may appear.

Bravo! How is this bad advice when it is what I am doing and has been working for me for decades? I started this with online brokers and companies and it has been saving me from what negatively affects others later. I have witnessed many stories of people who didn't do the KYC from the beginning but had problems with the company they dealt with later, especially when they wanted to withdraw money, particularly a sizable amount of it. You see, we have to be smart and I do not know why doing KYC is too hard for some of you when you are not criminals. But most of you are doing the KYC elsewhere on a daily basis, you are only faking it. As the world is now, it is revolving, you will hardly hide anywhere without KYC unless you want to deal with companies that are not reputable or less reputable.

Also, your argument is only valid for the no-KYC casinos, and by this, the person would have known that it is not required. But for those casinos that could be silent about it while other customers of the same casinos are doing the KYC, you might put yourself in trouble if you do not do it on time, unless you are a loser. Maybe you are not a winning gambler, that is why you are talking like this. But if you are a winning gambler, you should never leave any stone unturned, and even if you later have issues with your casinos due to their overbearing attitude, you would know that you did what you have to do from the onset. By the way, let me ask you, have you seen a casino that is not no-KYC and is fully registered and regulated that will let you continue to play forever without KYC? If you answer this with proof, maybe we can step our discussion further.

Of course, the exception itself is a temporary solution to the problem.
 As for the productive mental work of such a player, this really seems to be able to help him and a little drown out thoughts about gambling.
 But as for the good, everyday direction of development of the gambling industry, there is precisely a problem.  It’s just that most gambling manufacturers, in my opinion, are aimed at tough competition and often associated with violence in the virtual space.  Apparently these are the aspects that still attract more players. 
The spirit of competition and destruction of a defeated enemy is held in high esteem.  Game producers will justify this by the very bestial nature of man. 
Therefore, such a good everyday type of games is typical only for children.  For adult players it's different.

Most gamblers who have gambled too often have probably experienced a loss of self-control in gambling, so they only increase their problems even more. If they don't immediately solve their problems one by one, they will only get deeper into gambling without being able to get out of gambling. If they really want to exclude themselves from gambling, they must really be able to control themselves well and be able to get rid of the desire to gamble. If they can do that, they can use the self-exclusion feature well and they won't even use that feature but control themselves. That will help him reduce his desire to gamble.

Most of the sites don't have self-exclusion options.

The only was it to Delete the app.

self-excluding from anonymous gambling sites can be tricky,

Contact Support: Reach out to the site's customer support if possible and explain your situation.

Financial Blocks: Ask your bank or payment provider if they can block transactions to gambling sites.

Self-Regulation: Check if the site has self-exclusion tools or limits in its settings.

Gotta love posts like yours, lol, this is good (for who? investors?) but not good for those involved in gambling, so why exactly this thread has gotten over 10 pages of responses here? Maybe because it does contain some good advice and is "good" and useful for addicts who want to stop gambling?

In regulated countries (e.g. UK) you can now self-exclude by clicking on one single button, no need to chat/email or talk to anyone, you click on "Self Exclusion" and you're excluded, period.

The problem with crypto gambling sites, is that they don't have this regulation, for good or bad, but this can cause troubles for those who are holding crypto and can find themselves easily throwing away 5-6k $ digits in less than 24 hours, the websites won't tell them to stop, and even if they can "self exclude" their account, they can create a new one instantly and keep on wagering because crypto sites don't ask for your private information, they don't KYC every user/player, and so that creates a vicious cycle the addict wants to get out of.

The thread is offering a plausible solution advising the addict, just like in regulated countries, all it takes is 1 click of a button to self-exclude - then same thing here, all it takes is 1 single click and the funds can be taken away from you for 21+ days - what it does is create a situation where the addiction is being arrested!

No Money = No Gambling

But you like many others here seem to ignore this kind of thinking, maybe because you look at gambling from a very different perspective, not sure why it's hard for you to see the point.

PS Regarding the points about Atomic Wallet / Trust Wallet, yes, well accepting these points, but no need to edit the first post, Atomic is good as well.

This is good but not good for those who are anyways getting themselves involved in gambling. I am not sure how this is relevant but locking/staking fund is one type of investment while gambling is concious way to put your money on the sites that would generate live results about your wins and losses. It is evident that saving your money is simply saving while gambling is for fun, for adrenaline stuff and trying to chase the profits from in-gaming algos.

If someone really wants to save themselves from gambling then they simply need to stop gambling or control their habits/timings when they play. If they want to save money then they can do so by storing their coins on hardware wallets or cold storages because even with the staking you are free to withdraw money on timely basis. On the former one you can timelock them.

Im nodding to your self-exclusion points. Its good, but its like bandaging a leaky pipe. Under the surface, the issue persists. Obsessive thoughts about gambling again drain your brain batteries like background programs.

Imagine personal growth during self-exclusion. How about finance management or addiction psychology education? Give the brain healthy fuel for thinking. Understanding the "why" behind habits may help players avoid relapse. Knowledge is powerful and could change the game.

Family support is essential. Not just diverting them, but understanding and empathy. Discussing addiction, sharing stories, and even taking online classes or fitness challenges together. Replace one habit with healthier ones. So why not gamify these alternatives? Make healthy living fun. Life is the ultimate game, and we're all leveling up in our own manner.

I do remember that there are some long discussions in regarding on that sudden KYC level 1 of Roobet beforehand on which tons of gamblers or the said site did really react out on such change but the fact that you are really just that only needing those informations like the basic ones without needing to send those documents then you are still able to play. KYC levels would increase basing up on the money that you are depositing or overall wager on which its not shocking for these kind of platforms considering that they are really that regulated or centralized then its not really that shocking at all.
It is really just that there are ones who are really that too mindful and allergy when it comes to KYC aspects and this is why they do really have this kind of reaction into it.

This is bad advice. You should only complete KYC initially in casinos that mandatorily enforce it like Roobet etc. If it's not mandatory, you shouldn't submit your KYC information unless they request it later on.

It makes no difference when you submit your KYC as long as you are submitting accurate information without trying to fool the sites.

Gamblers that are having those problems need to do some serious soul searching and answer a simple question, can they really control their gambling and they have been lax on that control or they do have a problem and they cannot really control themselves anymore? If it is the former then they really need to step up their game and control themselves by any means possible, and if it is the latter then they need to recognize that even if gambling is something they enjoy greatly, the time has come to leave it behind for good.

The self-exclusion feature can be useful for someone who wants to avoid gambling. But if they still want to gamble, that won't work and they will just keep going back to the casino to gamble. Many gamblers still seem to have difficulty controlling themselves to stay away from gambling because gambling really tempts them to return to gambling. This is why when playing gambling, we have to be very careful and have strong self-control so that when we activate self-control, we can do it well. We can stay away from gambling for a while and not return to gambling.

Come off it bro, this is not about casinos protecting your interest or because of one government but because of their selfish interest in most cases. If I asked you, how many casinos have that strong regulation? Or do you think because they ask you for KYC or restrict amounts of betting, some do not launder money themselves?

This is not about being answerable to government officials but about them doing what they please. Casinos are one of the established I know that do as they like mostly, that is why they will refuse to pay bets and no government will query them about that. This is because they are highly underregulated and most of them are operating offshore. So if you think it is because of one regulation they are so particular about restrictions, you are not sincere with yourself, such is just a partial excuse that makes them look more legit. Only a few are strongly regulated but many are just acting. Regardless, I implore everyone to follow the terms and conditions of their casinos and to make sure that they complete their KYC from the beginning so that casinos will not use the excuse against them later.

I agree that the self-exclusion function is a very useful tool and a way for a person to fight against his passion for gambling, which can already turn into gambling addiction at the stage of mental illness.  Those casino devs who include this function in their algorithms act correctly and responsibly, since sometimes this function works more or less effectively.  But many gamblers, even when this function is turned on, still have an obsessive thought in their brains about how to quickly start playing again when the exception ends.  It seems to me that it is important for people close to the player during such periods to distract the player as much as possible with various conversations on other topics or requests to do something useful.  Then the brain automatically switches to other thoughts.  And it will become easier for the player.

All people can gamble, whether strong or weak, and they must have money to gamble. The important thing is that they can control themselves well to prevent many losses. Those who often gamble may find it difficult to stop gambling, but if their intention is strong, they will be able to stop gambling. People who get advice from others about quitting gambling are lucky people because there are still people who care about them and don't want to see them lose a lot. And if they don't want to listen to other people's suggestions, they will get deeper into gambling and this will probably make the people who initially gave them advice just see what will happen to the gambler. But if the gambler wants to listen to his advice and chooses to activate the self-exclusion feature, they are choosing a good path because the self-exclusion feature is for people who really want to limit their gambling activities. But to produce the desired results, the gambler must also strongly intend to limit himself from gambling.

I dont care about limitation or what when it comes or speaking about value of deposits and withdrawals that you could be able to take out since im not a huge wagerer and im not that expecting for some huge wins on which it wont really be an issue as long it wont really be having any problems in related about releasing withdrawals or simply being legit. We do have tons of casinos in the market today on which it would really be just that impossible that you cant really be able to find one. It is really just that a matter of research in speaking about choosing on what platform you are dealing with.
Self exclusions could really be seen on some platforms but basing up on the condition or situation that OP is really that elaborating on here, then its possible but its not something that not all would really be doing.