1070 mh/s with ethereum ? , work on windows 10 x64 ? .
Read up - 27mhs at 100wWin 10 will be available with July update or Insider preview build next week...
that hash is only where, on linux? what about win 7?
Topic: How will this change the world of mining?? GTX 1080 / 1070 - page 30. (Read 134091 times)
Win 10 will be available with July update or Insider preview build next week...
that hash is only where, on linux? what about win 7?
1070 mh/s with ethereum ? , work on windows 10 x64 ? .
Read up - 27mhs at 100wWin 10 will be available with July update or Insider preview build next week...
1070 mh/s with ethereum ? , work on windows 10 x64 ? .
1070`s are not out yet i don`t think.
1070 mh/s with ethereum ? , work on windows 10 x64 ? .
So i just ordered a GTX1080 today mostly for my VR, but i`m wondering what king of hashing speed i can get out of it to recoup some of the cost
the only stats i found so far was aroung 23MH for ETH, that is just 3mh more than my gtx 980, Can anyone shed some light on this .?
the only stats i found so far was aroung 23MH for ETH, that is just 3mh more than my gtx 980, Can anyone shed some light on this .?
For the 390, if you set the memory speed to be 1500MHz, the hashing speed is limited by the core frequency.
So why the 390x does not run faster than the 390, it has more cores.
So why the 390x does not run faster than the 390, it has more cores.
I think AMD should release a 512 bit memory bus card like 390, but runs faster and run with lower power.
Send em an email
who knows 
I think AMD should release a 512 bit memory bus card like 390, but runs faster and run with lower power.
The Nano/Fury have a MUCH higher rated memory bandwidth than my R9 290 cards do - yet do right about the SAME hashrate.
If memory bandwidth was the only issue, they'd be more like a 50MH ballpark card.
RX 480 has less memory bandwidth - it's 256 bit not 512 bit - than my R9 290s do. Higher clock makes up a lot of the difference, but half the width is a big hit.
Archetechure changes MIGHT make it faster - but they might make it SLOWER too, no way to know 'till someone actually works with one on Ethereum mining.
If memory bandwidth was the only issue, they'd be more like a 50MH ballpark card.
RX 480 has less memory bandwidth - it's 256 bit not 512 bit - than my R9 290s do. Higher clock makes up a lot of the difference, but half the width is a big hit.
Archetechure changes MIGHT make it faster - but they might make it SLOWER too, no way to know 'till someone actually works with one on Ethereum mining.
If this info : http://videocardz.com/amd/radeon-rx-400/radeon-rx-490
is real.
Then please take my money...
All next big gpus will be similar in memory bandwidthis real.
Then please take my money...
So perf will be similar (we will know when polaris is tested - I dont know if i can but I think i'll get it before launch - maybe around 20th of june)
So its just the matter who is early and what is the price
But its not pure memory bandwidth question as you all know - fury x is far from 60mhs - am i wrong?
The furyx is 40MHASH in copyspeed, and you will never reach copyspeed.
uhu, Fury X does around 32-33Mh (stock), correct me if i'm wrong..
yes but based on the bandwidth,, should be much higher, so that is not the only parameter that matter
If this info : http://videocardz.com/amd/radeon-rx-400/radeon-rx-490
is real.
Then please take my money...
All next big gpus will be similar in memory bandwidthis real.
Then please take my money...
So perf will be similar (we will know when polaris is tested - I dont know if i can but I think i'll get it before launch - maybe around 20th of june)
So its just the matter who is early and what is the price
But its not pure memory bandwidth question as you all know - fury x is far from 60mhs - am i wrong?
The furyx is 40MHASH in copyspeed, and you will never reach copyspeed.
uhu, Fury X does around 32-33Mh (stock), correct me if i'm wrong..
If this info : http://videocardz.com/amd/radeon-rx-400/radeon-rx-490
is real.
Then please take my money...
All next big gpus will be similar in memory bandwidthis real.
Then please take my money...
So perf will be similar (we will know when polaris is tested - I dont know if i can but I think i'll get it before launch - maybe around 20th of june)
So its just the matter who is early and what is the price
But its not pure memory bandwidth question as you all know - fury x is far from 60mhs - am i wrong?
The furyx is 40MHASH in copyspeed, and you will never reach copyspeed.
If this info : http://videocardz.com/amd/radeon-rx-400/radeon-rx-490
is real.
Then please take my money...
All next big gpus will be similar in memory bandwidthis real.
Then please take my money...
So perf will be similar (we will know when polaris is tested - I dont know if i can but I think i'll get it before launch - maybe around 20th of june)
So its just the matter who is early and what is the price
But its not pure memory bandwidth question as you all know - fury x is far from 60mhs - am i wrong?
If this info : http://videocardz.com/amd/radeon-rx-400/radeon-rx-490
is real.
Then please take my money...
is real.
Then please take my money...
that memory bandwidth is insane, it could in theory do 90MH on etehreum if i'm not mistaken
It might not be too fast in Ethereum mining. We need fast speed or the lower latency. Not the bandwidth.
vaulter, do you happen to have any donation address?
No, but you can use Genoil's I have been using it. Did some funding to Genoil's pascal foundation.
Looks like I can finally spend it
. Dual miner...should be fun...better than patching stratum protocols
What is the ETA for the first results from Genoil´s pascal laboratory?
Vaulter, can we expect also early benchmarks of Polaris?
vaulter run ethminer -V -G if you are using genoil in ubuntu.
Specs of your miner and config are appreciated...as much details as possible please.
Specs of your miner and config are appreciated...as much details as possible please.
If this info : http://videocardz.com/amd/radeon-rx-400/radeon-rx-490
is real.
Then please take my money...
is real.
Then please take my money...
that memory bandwidth is insane, it could in theory do 90MH on etehreum if i'm not mistaken
Never play the waiting game ... end up never doing anything ...
I doubt it's real though.. we'll see
If this info : http://videocardz.com/amd/radeon-rx-400/radeon-rx-490
is real.
Then please take my money...
is real.
Then please take my money...
that memory bandwidth is insane, it could in theory do 90MH on etehreum if i'm not mistaken
Jump to: