How will this change the world of mining?? GTX 1080 / 1070 - page 25.

Mometaskers

hero member

Activity: 1764

Merit: 584

Quote from: sanas on June 30, 2016, 03:54:34 AM

Quote from: Zitdadast on June 29, 2016, 11:07:13 AM

Quote from: onemd on June 28, 2016, 03:52:46 PM

Quote from: mandica on June 27, 2016, 02:57:12 PM

Quote from: restless on June 27, 2016, 03:10:22 AM

As the architecture of shaders is not changed much expected performance is near level of Hawaii with 2304 shader cores multiplied by core clock
If you expect 480 to be faster than Hawaii, then think again

I agree with that. According to the latest mining performance of the 480 RX, it is slower than the R9 390.

Although it is slower, it is more efficient. It depends on your electricity price. If it is high, it is better to use 480.

For the high electricity price people, they should not use graphics to mine. If they invest now, there will be no ROI.

The network hash rate is over 4000G now, that is almost 200,000 of AMD R9 280X/380X. The 480X will also be added.

I think half of that is the 280x or early graphics cards and half of them are the 390 or later graphics cards.

sanas

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

Quote from: Zitdadast on June 29, 2016, 11:07:13 AM

Quote from: onemd on June 28, 2016, 03:52:46 PM

Quote from: mandica on June 27, 2016, 02:57:12 PM

Quote from: restless on June 27, 2016, 03:10:22 AM

As the architecture of shaders is not changed much expected performance is near level of Hawaii with 2304 shader cores multiplied by core clock
If you expect 480 to be faster than Hawaii, then think again

I agree with that. According to the latest mining performance of the 480 RX, it is slower than the R9 390.

Although it is slower, it is more efficient. It depends on your electricity price. If it is high, it is better to use 480.

For the high electricity price people, they should not use graphics to mine. If they invest now, there will be no ROI.

The network hash rate is over 4000G now, that is almost 200,000 of AMD R9 280X/380X. The 480X will also be added.

Zitdadast

sr. member

Activity: 312

Merit: 250

LTC fan 4ever

Quote from: onemd on June 28, 2016, 03:52:46 PM

Quote from: mandica on June 27, 2016, 02:57:12 PM

Quote from: restless on June 27, 2016, 03:10:22 AM

As the architecture of shaders is not changed much expected performance is near level of Hawaii with 2304 shader cores multiplied by core clock
If you expect 480 to be faster than Hawaii, then think again

I agree with that. According to the latest mining performance of the 480 RX, it is slower than the R9 390.

Although it is slower, it is more efficient. It depends on your electricity price. If it is high, it is better to use 480.

For the high electricity price people, they should not use graphics to mine. If they invest now, there will be no ROI.

onemd

full member

Activity: 309

Merit: 118

Quote from: mandica on June 27, 2016, 02:57:12 PM

Quote from: restless on June 27, 2016, 03:10:22 AM

As the architecture of shaders is not changed much expected performance is near level of Hawaii with 2304 shader cores multiplied by core clock
If you expect 480 to be faster than Hawaii, then think again

I agree with that. According to the latest mining performance of the 480 RX, it is slower than the R9 390.

Although it is slower, it is more efficient. It depends on your electricity price. If it is high, it is better to use 480.

mandica

hero member

Activity: 693

Merit: 508

Quote from: restless on June 27, 2016, 03:10:22 AM

As the architecture of shaders is not changed much expected performance is near level of Hawaii with 2304 shader cores multiplied by core clock
If you expect 480 to be faster than Hawaii, then think again

I agree with that. According to the latest mining performance of the 480 RX, it is slower than the R9 390.

restless

legendary

Activity: 1151

Merit: 1001

As the architecture of shaders is not changed much expected performance is near level of Hawaii with 2304 shader cores multiplied by core clock
If you expect 480 to be faster than Hawaii, then think again

ltc_bilic

member

Activity: 130

Merit: 10

Quote from: restless on June 25, 2016, 02:20:12 AM

Quote from: ltc_bilic on June 24, 2016, 10:38:30 AM

first impressions from cryptomining blog on 1070: http://cryptomining-blog.com/8016-testing-the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070-founders-edition-for-crypto-mining/

now waiting for polaris results Wink

There are results for stock 480 - 24MH/s and with overclock 26-28 http://cryptomining-blog.com/8008-possible-ethereum-hashrate-for-the-new-amd-radeon-rx-480/
Just as expected

we'll I don't trust those screenshots, and furthermore not everyone is mining eth,...so waiting for a review for every other algo,...

restless

legendary

Activity: 1151

Merit: 1001

Quote from: ltc_bilic on June 24, 2016, 10:38:30 AM

first impressions from cryptomining blog on 1070: http://cryptomining-blog.com/8016-testing-the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070-founders-edition-for-crypto-mining/

now waiting for polaris results Wink

There are results for stock 480 - 24MH/s and with overclock 26-28 http://cryptomining-blog.com/8008-possible-ethereum-hashrate-for-the-new-amd-radeon-rx-480/
Just as expected

jimlite

legendary

Activity: 1848

Merit: 1018

So what do you have to do in Win 7 64 to get a 1080 to mine? It either doesn't work or is .75Mh/s. Obviously the nvidia drivers or mining software isn't working with 1080. I've owned every graphics card made in the last 20 years and this is by FAR the fastest. There is no way it won't be an ETH mining monster once this shit is fixed.

fredeq

legendary

Activity: 1537

Merit: 1005

Quote from: dumpida on June 23, 2016, 08:30:35 AM

Quote from: fredeq on June 22, 2016, 12:11:07 PM

I would prefer a card with 30+ Mhash as well Wink

You need to buy the 1070 or the R9 490. I am pretty sure the 490 will be faster than the 390 and consumes less.

I kind of hoped for 480 to deliver around 30 at stock Wink

390 is twice as expensive as 380, but producing only 1,5x more hashrate. Expecting the same from future 490.
Will be buying 480 for sure, as 1070 is too expensive for my taste.

ltc_bilic

member

Activity: 130

Merit: 10

first impressions from cryptomining blog on 1070: http://cryptomining-blog.com/8016-testing-the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070-founders-edition-for-crypto-mining/

now waiting for polaris results Wink

dumpida

hero member

Activity: 722

Merit: 500

Quote from: fredeq on June 22, 2016, 12:11:07 PM

I would prefer a card with 30+ Mhash as well Wink

You need to buy the 1070 or the R9 490. I am pretty sure the 490 will be faster than the 390 and consumes less.

fredeq

legendary

Activity: 1537

Merit: 1005

I would prefer a card with 30+ Mhash as well Wink

asdalani

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 500

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Quote from: fredeq on June 22, 2016, 07:29:33 AM

http://cryptomining-blog.com/8008-possible-ethereum-hashrate-for-the-new-amd-radeon-rx-480/

Someone reported 480 to do 24@100W

It is just as good as my R9 nano. But its price is cheap if it is for sale at around $220. My nano is 2.5x price.

Lucky - Luciano

hero member

Activity: 711

Merit: 500

Quote from: fredeq on June 22, 2016, 07:29:33 AM

http://cryptomining-blog.com/8008-possible-ethereum-hashrate-for-the-new-amd-radeon-rx-480/

Someone reported 480 to do 24@100W

Do not you see that this is a montage?

fredeq

legendary

Activity: 1537

Merit: 1005

http://cryptomining-blog.com/8008-possible-ethereum-hashrate-for-the-new-amd-radeon-rx-480/

Someone reported 480 to do 24@100W

bathrobehero

legendary

Activity: 2002

Merit: 1051

ICO? Not even once.

Quote from: Zitdadast on June 16, 2016, 05:53:22 AM

Quote from: QuintLeo on June 15, 2016, 02:35:53 AM

Quote from: Amph on June 14, 2016, 02:45:50 AM

undervolting is still possible without a mod, with amd, just use msi, dunno why nvidia do not have this, i guess there is another good software that let you undervolt with nvidia

maybe nvidia inspector

PrecisionX - if it works on non-EVGA cards.

Doesn't allow undervolting on ALL EVGA cards though - seems like the BIOS sets limits on which can and which can't.

I tried to use PrecisionX. But it does not allow non EVGA cards. So I do not use it, I only use the MSI afterburner or Trixx.

I doubt that's true though I don't use the new versions so I wouldn't know (I stopped upgrading Precision X when it started to only support up to 4 cards).

I use Precision X v4.2.1.2143 for years without issues and I don't have a single EVGA card.

restless

legendary

Activity: 1151

Merit: 1001

Some people are already testing new Win10 build with WDDM 2.1 inside
... probably soon a driver will leak, but it seems there is DX update (upto 12.1?), so probably running this driver on un-updated OS is not recommended

Bemerand

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

Quote from: mewhoyou on June 18, 2016, 10:20:03 AM

Wait for the OEM or get from NVidia now?

It is better to wait. The extra hash you get now is less than the money you save from the cheap OEM cards.

mewhoyou

sr. member

Activity: 353

Merit: 250

Wait for the OEM or get from NVidia now?

Topic: How will this change the world of mining?? GTX 1080 / 1070 - page 25. (Read 134091 times)