Topic: How will this change the world of mining?? GTX 1080 / 1070 - page 28. (Read 134124 times)

The AMD Nano/Fury line are all MUCH higher core count, faster clocks, faster memory, MUCH wider memory bus - and mine SLOWER than my 2-generation old R9 290s, which routinely see 30 MH and I've not pushed them as far as they CAN go (best figure I've seen for the Nano was 27).

There appears to be more than just pure "memory bandwidth" involved in how fast Ethereum can be mined by a given model of GPU.

Fury-x can do around 32mh/s on ethereum + 1700mh/s on decred simultaneaously with claymore dual miner. Nano just a little bit less (for nano http://mininghwcomparison.com/list/index.php?brand=amd)

Stock clocks, or overclocked?

Efficiency on the Fury/Nano is very good from everything I've seen, but still not impressive that a card with a ton more memory bandwidth and almost twice the Stream units is so poor on hashrate compared to a 2 generation old card.

Is that 32Mh at stock clocks, or overclocked?

So for the Fury/nano cards, is it better to dual mine so that the core processors can be utilised fullly?

agente

full member

Activity: 239

Merit: 100

Quote from: ol92 on June 09, 2016, 08:51:53 AM

Stock clocks, or overclocked?

Efficiency on the Fury/Nano is very good from everything I've seen, but still not impressive that a card with a ton more memory bandwidth and almost twice the Stream units is so poor on hashrate compared to a 2 generation old card.

Is that 32Mh at stock clocks, or overclocked?

Stock (30mh for me)

QuintLeo

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1030

Quote from: jimlite on June 09, 2016, 06:49:35 PM

The AMD Nano/Fury line are all MUCH higher core count, faster clocks, faster memory, MUCH wider memory bus - and mine SLOWER than my 2-generation old R9 290s, which routinely see 30 MH and I've not pushed them as far as they CAN go (best figure I've seen for the Nano was 27).

There appears to be more than just pure "memory bandwidth" involved in how fast Ethereum can be mined by a given model of GPU.

Fury-x can do around 32mh/s on ethereum + 1700mh/s on decred simultaneaously with claymore dual miner. Nano just a little bit less (for nano http://mininghwcomparison.com/list/index.php?brand=amd)

Stock clocks, or overclocked?

Efficiency on the Fury/Nano is very good from everything I've seen, but still not impressive that a card with a ton more memory bandwidth and almost twice the Stream units is so poor on hashrate compared to a 2 generation old card.

Is that 32Mh at stock clocks, or overclocked?

vaulter

full member

Activity: 174

Merit: 100

Quote from: Bokelka on June 09, 2016, 03:49:43 AM

Quote from: Bokelka on June 09, 2016, 03:49:43 AM

1070 mh/s with ethereum ? , work on windows 10 x64 ? .

Read up - 27mhs at 100w
Win 10 will be available with July update or Insider preview build next week...

that hash is only where, on linux? what about win 7?

Linux and Win 10
Dont know about win 7 - maybe they release the driver for that..

Very good! only 100w!!! Thanks!

And Gtx 1080 ? .

The GTX 1080 is slower than the 1070 in mining the Ethereum. There is no point in getting that for mining.

You are confused. There is no way the 1080 can be slower than the 1070. It is impossible, 1080 has more cores, faster memory, and wider memory bus. Don't be an idiot. If someone tested a 1080 as slower than a 1070, then there are software issues.

Do you mine? Have you used 1080 or 1070 to mine? If you have mined with those cards, you would not say that.

I don't need to mine with them to say that. The 1070 is just a 1080 with some of the cores disabled and slower memory and memory bus. There is no freaking way a 1070 mines faster than a 1080, period. Unless their is some massive overclock on the 1070 and the correct software/drivers and the 1080 has shit software and drivers. Wake up dude, just cuz someone posts something doesn't mean it is true. There are a lot of variables in every mining rig but the bottom line is if you put a 1080 in the same exact rig it is going to mine faster than a 1070.

That is a nice position - but youll have to wait 1 week tops when some else will post the 1070 results
The reason 1080 is slower in eth right now (it might change in future, hopefully) is the gddr5x memory config - its different to gddr5 and in this case its slower than 1070 its also slower in neoscrypt - all the other compute algos are faster of course

jimlite

legendary

Activity: 1848

Merit: 1018

1070 mh/s with ethereum ? , work on windows 10 x64 ? .

Read up - 27mhs at 100w
Win 10 will be available with July update or Insider preview build next week...

that hash is only where, on linux? what about win 7?

Linux and Win 10
Dont know about win 7 - maybe they release the driver for that..

Very good! only 100w!!! Thanks!

And Gtx 1080 ? .

The GTX 1080 is slower than the 1070 in mining the Ethereum. There is no point in getting that for mining.

You are confused. There is no way the 1080 can be slower than the 1070. It is impossible, 1080 has more cores, faster memory, and wider memory bus. Don't be an idiot. If someone tested a 1080 as slower than a 1070, then there are software issues.

Do you mine? Have you used 1080 or 1070 to mine? If you have mined with those cards, you would not say that.

I don't need to mine with them to say that. The 1070 is just a 1080 with some of the cores disabled and slower memory and memory bus. There is no freaking way a 1070 mines faster than a 1080, period. Unless their is some massive overclock on the 1070 and the correct software/drivers and the 1080 has shit software and drivers. Wake up dude, just cuz someone posts something doesn't mean it is true. There are a lot of variables in every mining rig but the bottom line is if you put a 1080 in the same exact rig it is going to mine faster than a 1070.

ol92

sr. member

Activity: 445

Merit: 255

Quote from: restless on June 09, 2016, 05:39:40 AM

1070 mh/s with ethereum ? , work on windows 10 x64 ? .

Read up - 27mhs at 100w
Win 10 will be available with July update or Insider preview build next week...

that hash is only where, on linux? what about win 7?

Linux and Win 10
Dont know about win 7 - maybe they release the driver for that..

Very good! only 100w!!! Thanks!

And Gtx 1080 ? .

The GTX 1080 is slower than the 1070 in mining the Ethereum. There is no point in getting that for mining.

You are confused. There is no way the 1080 can be slower than the 1070. It is impossible, 1080 has more cores, faster memory, and wider memory bus. Don't be an idiot. If someone tested a 1080 as slower than a 1070, then there are software issues.

The AMD Nano/Fury line are all MUCH higher core count, faster clocks, faster memory, MUCH wider memory bus - and mine SLOWER than my 2-generation old R9 290s, which routinely see 30 MH and I've not pushed them as far as they CAN go (best figure I've seen for the Nano was 27).

There appears to be more than just pure "memory bandwidth" involved in how fast Ethereum can be mined by a given model of GPU.

Fury-x can do around 32mh/s on ethereum + 1700mh/s on decred simultaneaously with claymore dual miner. Nano just a little bit less (for nano http://mininghwcomparison.com/list/index.php?brand=amd)

Persinon

newbie

Activity: 22

Merit: 0

Quote from: restless on June 09, 2016, 05:39:40 AM

The AMD Nano/Fury line are all MUCH higher core count, faster clocks, faster memory, MUCH wider memory bus - and mine SLOWER than my 2-generation old R9 290s, which routinely see 30 MH and I've not pushed them as far as they CAN go (best figure I've seen for the Nano was 27).

There appears to be more than just pure "memory bandwidth" involved in how fast Ethereum can be mined by a given model of GPU.

With bios mod Fury go upto ~ 35MH, using less power than 290

The Nano is more efficient than the R9 390 even both with undervolt and under clock. It is about 20-40% more efficient.

sanas

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

The AMD Nano/Fury line are all MUCH higher core count, faster clocks, faster memory, MUCH wider memory bus - and mine SLOWER than my 2-generation old R9 290s, which routinely see 30 MH and I've not pushed them as far as they CAN go (best figure I've seen for the Nano was 27).

There appears to be more than just pure "memory bandwidth" involved in how fast Ethereum can be mined by a given model of GPU.

With bios mod Fury go upto ~ 35MH, using less power than 290

The Nano chips are handpicked Fury XT chips. They consume lower power than the Fury XT and also 390.

restless

legendary

Activity: 1151

Merit: 1001

The AMD Nano/Fury line are all MUCH higher core count, faster clocks, faster memory, MUCH wider memory bus - and mine SLOWER than my 2-generation old R9 290s, which routinely see 30 MH and I've not pushed them as far as they CAN go (best figure I've seen for the Nano was 27).

There appears to be more than just pure "memory bandwidth" involved in how fast Ethereum can be mined by a given model of GPU.

With bios mod Fury go upto ~ 35MH, using less power than 290

Bokelka

sr. member

Activity: 242

Merit: 250

Quote from: kaltar on June 08, 2016, 04:00:37 PM

1070 mh/s with ethereum ? , work on windows 10 x64 ? .

Read up - 27mhs at 100w
Win 10 will be available with July update or Insider preview build next week...

that hash is only where, on linux? what about win 7?

Linux and Win 10
Dont know about win 7 - maybe they release the driver for that..

Very good! only 100w!!! Thanks!

And Gtx 1080 ? .

The GTX 1080 is slower than the 1070 in mining the Ethereum. There is no point in getting that for mining.

You are confused. There is no way the 1080 can be slower than the 1070. It is impossible, 1080 has more cores, faster memory, and wider memory bus. Don't be an idiot. If someone tested a 1080 as slower than a 1070, then there are software issues.

Do you mine? Have you used 1080 or 1070 to mine? If you have mined with those cards, you would not say that.

QuintLeo

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1030

wow that`s really bad, but i did read somewhere that widows runs it a 1/4 to 1/5 of what you would get under linux.

Not true.
Windows 10 has issues with certain recent AMD driver versions and mining, but otherwise Windows can achieve very similar hashrates to LINUX - the BIG differences are:
(1) Windows actually has superior tools for managing over/underclock, powertune, voltages, etc
(2) LINUX is free, Windows co$t$
(3) Windows for multi-GPU setups is a lot harder to get going at all, and SOMETIMES needs "dummy VGA plugs" to see more than one card on some card models, LINUX tends to need a bit more manual setup to get set up but then tends to just work.
(4) Drivers tend to get updated faster for Windows

QuintLeo

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1030

1070 mh/s with ethereum ? , work on windows 10 x64 ? .

Read up - 27mhs at 100w
Win 10 will be available with July update or Insider preview build next week...

that hash is only where, on linux? what about win 7?

Linux and Win 10
Dont know about win 7 - maybe they release the driver for that..

Very good! only 100w!!! Thanks!

And Gtx 1080 ? .

The GTX 1080 is slower than the 1070 in mining the Ethereum. There is no point in getting that for mining.

You are confused. There is no way the 1080 can be slower than the 1070. It is impossible, 1080 has more cores, faster memory, and wider memory bus. Don't be an idiot. If someone tested a 1080 as slower than a 1070, then there are software issues.

The AMD Nano/Fury line are all MUCH higher core count, faster clocks, faster memory, MUCH wider memory bus - and mine SLOWER than my 2-generation old R9 290s, which routinely see 30 MH and I've not pushed them as far as they CAN go (best figure I've seen for the Nano was 27).

There appears to be more than just pure "memory bandwidth" involved in how fast Ethereum can be mined by a given model of GPU.

giagge

legendary

Activity: 1134

Merit: 1001

Nist5_tpruvot from nicehashminer 1.5

http://image.prntscr.com/image/8becbdfac07441b4986e9daa78858afb.png

Thanks! its a nist5 algo ?

I have 13 MH/S with Geforce GTX 950 Overclocked

Base Clock : 1235MHz / Boost Clock : 1425MHz
Mem: 7800Mhz

.

dumpida

hero member

Activity: 722

Merit: 500

1070 mh/s with ethereum ? , work on windows 10 x64 ? .

Read up - 27mhs at 100w
Win 10 will be available with July update or Insider preview build next week...

that hash is only where, on linux? what about win 7?

Linux and Win 10
Dont know about win 7 - maybe they release the driver for that..

Very good! only 100w!!! Thanks!

And Gtx 1080 ? .

The GTX 1080 is slower than the 1070 in mining the Ethereum. There is no point in getting that for mining.

You are confused. There is no way the 1080 can be slower than the 1070. It is impossible, 1080 has more cores, faster memory, and wider memory bus. Don't be an idiot. If someone tested a 1080 as slower than a 1070, then there are software issues.

Do you think the 980 or 980Ti is faster than 970 in the Ethereum mining? I heard the 970 is much faster.

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1072

Quote from: Lucky - Luciano on June 08, 2016, 07:11:33 PM

Nist5_tpruvot from nicehashminer 1.5

what algo is that? lyra2v2?

pattanan

newbie

Activity: 55

Merit: 0

[/quote]

Nist5_tpruvot from nicehashminer 1.5

http://image.prntscr.com/image/8becbdfac07441b4986e9daa78858afb.png

How much hashed for Ethereum?

Not sure if picture is not shown, its 4.2mh

jimlite

legendary

Activity: 1848

Merit: 1018

1070 mh/s with ethereum ? , work on windows 10 x64 ? .

Read up - 27mhs at 100w
Win 10 will be available with July update or Insider preview build next week...

that hash is only where, on linux? what about win 7?

Linux and Win 10
Dont know about win 7 - maybe they release the driver for that..

Very good! only 100w!!! Thanks!

And Gtx 1080 ? .

The GTX 1080 is slower than the 1070 in mining the Ethereum. There is no point in getting that for mining.

You are confused. There is no way the 1080 can be slower than the 1070. It is impossible, 1080 has more cores, faster memory, and wider memory bus. Don't be an idiot. If someone tested a 1080 as slower than a 1070, then there are software issues.

Lucky - Luciano

hero member

Activity: 711

Merit: 500