Topic: How will this change the world of mining?? GTX 1080 / 1070 - page 37. (Read 134117 times)

Quote from: Amph on May 20, 2016, 09:31:17 AM

Genoil is it really only 24Mhash for 1080? Cant be Tongue

It is 24mhs at 140w that is for 1080 - the big question is 1070 that will be better choice for mining anyway (or even other cheaper Pascal based GPUs)

well that's bad, because right now a 390 can do the same with the same wattage, now imagines what a 490 can do

so i think if the new gpu will not be optimized in some way they will be out of the cryptoscene altogether

It's not unthinkable that AMD is going the same way with their architecture. You already see that in their GCN1.2 line. Narrower buses, delta compression, all to save power. I wouldn't be surprised if 490 also sticks in the 20-25 range for ETH.

With 2MB page size support we may see performance up to full bandwidth utilization. But that's pure speculation.

Do you have a chance to use the 1080/70 and optimise the Ethereum miner? I hope it will be faster.

Genoil

sr. member

Activity: 438

Merit: 250

Quote from: vaulter on May 20, 2016, 08:46:25 AM

Quote from: vaulter on May 20, 2016, 08:46:25 AM

Genoil is it really only 24Mhash for 1080? Cant be Tongue

It is 24mhs at 140w that is for 1080 - the big question is 1070 that will be better choice for mining anyway (or even other cheaper Pascal based GPUs)

well that's bad, because right now a 390 can do the same with the same wattage, now imagines what a 490 can do

so i think if the new gpu will not be optimized in some way they will be out of the cryptoscene altogether

It's not unthinkable that AMD is going the same way with their architecture. You already see that in their GCN1.2 line. Narrower buses, delta compression, all to save power. I wouldn't be surprised if 490 also sticks in the 20-25 range for ETH.

With 2MB page size support we may see performance up to full bandwidth utilization. But that's pure speculation.

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Genoil is it really only 24Mhash for 1080? Cant be Tongue

It is 24mhs at 140w that is for 1080 - the big question is 1070 that will be better choice for mining anyway (or even other cheaper Pascal based GPUs)

well that's bad, because right now a 390 can do the same with the same wattage, now imagines what a 490 can do

so i think if the new gpu will not be optimized in some way they will be out of the cryptoscene altogether

vaulter

full member

Activity: 174

Merit: 100

Quote from: Genoil on May 18, 2016, 03:48:20 PM

Genoil is it really only 24Mhash for 1080? Cant be Tongue

It is 24mhs at 140w that is for 1080 - the big question is 1070 that will be better choice for mining anyway (or even other cheaper Pascal based GPUs)

fredeq

legendary

Activity: 1537

Merit: 1005

Genoil is it really only 24Mhash for 1080? Cant be Tongue

mandica

hero member

Activity: 693

Merit: 508

Quote from: Genoil on May 18, 2016, 03:48:20 PM

I heard 6MH for ethereum, is that correct? :O
unimpressive so far...
290 stock
X11   12100
X13   4700
Keccak 300000
X15   3000
Qubit   12200
Quark 19000 vs 32000
Lyra2REv2   15000 vs 16000

All only with GPL miners, quite sure there are even faster versions in the wild, I don't have access to optimized decred miner, but probably will be around 3000

About 24MH/s on Linux, exactly like I predicted (can't find the proof tho Grin

)

Do you mean the 1080 mine the Ethereum at 24 MH/s?

What is the 290 stock above? Is that AMD R9 290?

restless

legendary

Activity: 1151

Merit: 1001

Probably between 100 and 150

Ayers

legendary

Activity: 2590

Merit: 1022

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Genoil on May 18, 2016, 03:48:20 PM

I heard 6MH for ethereum, is that correct? :O
unimpressive so far...
290 stock
X11   12100
X13   4700
Keccak 300000
X15   3000
Qubit   12200
Quark 19000 vs 32000
Lyra2REv2   15000 vs 16000

All only with GPL miners, quite sure there are even faster versions in the wild, I don't have access to optimized decred miner, but probably will be around 3000

About 24MH/s on Linux, exactly like I predicted (can't find the proof tho Grin

)

what is the wattage?

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

I heard 6MH for ethereum, is that correct? :O
unimpressive so far...
290 stock
X11   12100
X13   4700
Keccak 300000
X15   3000
Qubit   12200
Quark 19000 vs 32000
Lyra2REv2   15000 vs 16000

All only with GPL miners, quite sure there are even faster versions in the wild, I don't have access to optimized decred miner, but probably will be around 3000

About 24MH/s on Linux, exactly like I predicted (can't find the proof tho Grin

)

is that the 1080? very underwhelming if yes

Genoil

sr. member

Activity: 438

Merit: 250

Quote from: restless on May 18, 2016, 03:16:29 PM

I heard 6MH for ethereum, is that correct? :O
unimpressive so far...
290 stock
X11   12100
X13   4700
Keccak 300000
X15   3000
Qubit   12200
Quark 19000 vs 32000
Lyra2REv2   15000 vs 16000

All only with GPL miners, quite sure there are even faster versions in the wild, I don't have access to optimized decred miner, but probably will be around 3000

About 24MH/s on Linux, exactly like I predicted (can't find the proof tho Grin

)

restless

legendary

Activity: 1151

Merit: 1001

I heard 6MH for ethereum, is that correct? :O
unimpressive so far...
290 stock
X11   12100
X13   4700
Keccak 300000
X15   3000
Qubit   12200
Quark 19000 vs 32000
Lyra2REv2   15000 vs 16000

All only with GPL miners, quite sure there are even faster versions in the wild, I don't have access to optimized decred miner, but probably will be around 3000

vaulter

full member

Activity: 174

Merit: 100

so someone bought the 1080, for testing how the hashrate is in all the algo?

Neosrypt and etherium needs clarifying - maybe will be bound to linux on release - cant tell the numbers yet

Not working at all ?!

Working - but for neoscrypt - I need to test linux - and for ethereum its linux only - performance is low on windows at the moment...

restless

legendary

Activity: 1151

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Amph on May 18, 2016, 12:17:29 PM

so someone bought the 1080, for testing how the hashrate is in all the algo?

Neosrypt and etherium needs clarifying - maybe will be bound to linux on release - cant tell the numbers yet

Not working at all ?!

fricircled

full member

Activity: 201

Merit: 100

Quote from: kahir on May 18, 2016, 11:36:05 AM

Quote from: Amph on May 18, 2016, 05:28:16 AM

Quote from: kahir on May 18, 2016, 11:36:05 AM

so someone bought the 1080, for testing how the hashrate is in all the algo?

For 1080
Decred 3200
Lyrarev2 16000
Quark 32000
Neosrypt and etherium needs clarifying - maybe will be bound to linux on release - cant tell the numbers yet
All is at 180w
1070(maybe it will change a bit)
Decred 2300
Quark 23000
At 120w

good, this of course is without all the tweak that need to be done, and not to mention proper drivers, i can easily see 40mega on quark for a 1080 and 30mega for a 1070

those gpu with those number on decred, can make it once again profitable with lower consumption, pretty beastly, i can not wait to make a rig with those

Dont expect much more with quark - overclocked it was 35000 - maybe with private kernel it might be more overclocked

yes but what driver are you using for those? nvidia didnt release proper driver for the new gpu, that alone can boost the performance

also code on the miner can be tweaked to increase the performance, i remember the inital value for the 970 was lower than today standard, when it was released and tested with quark and other algo

the hashrate on quark at the beginning, for example, for the 970 was only 10.5 mega, look now it's 17m without the private and with oc

Amph what do you think will happen to the 900 series price wise

250 euro already now, for used, probably around 200, when the other gpu will be released and face a drop in their value, so around august?

If the difficulty continue to rise, for the high electricity price miners, they can only make profit with the new cards.

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: Amph on May 18, 2016, 05:28:16 AM

Quote from: Amph on May 18, 2016, 05:28:16 AM

so someone bought the 1080, for testing how the hashrate is in all the algo?

For 1080
Decred 3200
Lyrarev2 16000
Quark 32000
Neosrypt and etherium needs clarifying - maybe will be bound to linux on release - cant tell the numbers yet
All is at 180w
1070(maybe it will change a bit)
Decred 2300
Quark 23000
At 120w

good, this of course is without all the tweak that need to be done, and not to mention proper drivers, i can easily see 40mega on quark for a 1080 and 30mega for a 1070

those gpu with those number on decred, can make it once again profitable with lower consumption, pretty beastly, i can not wait to make a rig with those

Dont expect much more with quark - overclocked it was 35000 - maybe with private kernel it might be more overclocked

yes but what driver are you using for those? nvidia didnt release proper driver for the new gpu, that alone can boost the performance

also code on the miner can be tweaked to increase the performance, i remember the inital value for the 970 was lower than today standard, when it was released and tested with quark and other algo

the hashrate on quark at the beginning, for example, for the 970 was only 10.5 mega, look now it's 17m without the private and with oc

Amph what do you think will happen to the 900 series price wise

250 euro already now, for used, probably around 200, when the other gpu will be released and face a drop in their value, so around august?

kahir

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1000

so someone bought the 1080, for testing how the hashrate is in all the algo?

For 1080
Decred 3200
Lyrarev2 16000
Quark 32000
Neosrypt and etherium needs clarifying - maybe will be bound to linux on release - cant tell the numbers yet
All is at 180w
1070(maybe it will change a bit)
Decred 2300
Quark 23000
At 120w

good, this of course is without all the tweak that need to be done, and not to mention proper drivers, i can easily see 40mega on quark for a 1080 and 30mega for a 1070

those gpu with those number on decred, can make it once again profitable with lower consumption, pretty beastly, i can not wait to make a rig with those

Dont expect much more with quark - overclocked it was 35000 - maybe with private kernel it might be more overclocked

yes but what driver are you using for those? nvidia didnt release proper driver for the new gpu, that alone can boost the performance

also code on the miner can be tweaked to increase the performance, i remember the inital value for the 970 was lower than today standard, when it was released and tested with quark and other algo

the hashrate on quark at the beginning, for example, for the 970 was only 10.5 mega, look now it's 17m without the private and with oc

Amph what do you think will happen to the 900 series price wise

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

so someone bought the 1080, for testing how the hashrate is in all the algo?

For 1080
Decred 3200
Lyrarev2 16000
Quark 32000
Neosrypt and etherium needs clarifying - maybe will be bound to linux on release - cant tell the numbers yet
All is at 180w
1070(maybe it will change a bit)
Decred 2300
Quark 23000
At 120w

good, this of course is without all the tweak that need to be done, and not to mention proper drivers, i can easily see 40mega on quark for a 1080 and 30mega for a 1070

those gpu with those number on decred, can make it once again profitable with lower consumption, pretty beastly, i can not wait to make a rig with those

Dont expect much more with quark - overclocked it was 35000 - maybe with private kernel it might be more overclocked

yes but what driver are you using for those? nvidia didnt release proper driver for the new gpu, that alone can boost the performance

also code on the miner can be tweaked to increase the performance, i remember the inital value for the 970 was lower than today standard, when it was released and tested with quark and other algo

the hashrate on quark at the beginning, for example, for the 970 was only 10.5 mega, look now it's 17m without the private and with oc

vaulter

full member

Activity: 174

Merit: 100

so someone bought the 1080, for testing how the hashrate is in all the algo?

For 1080
Decred 3200
Lyrarev2 16000
Quark 32000
Neosrypt and etherium needs clarifying - maybe will be bound to linux on release - cant tell the numbers yet
All is at 180w
1070(maybe it will change a bit)
Decred 2300
Quark 23000
At 120w

good, this of course is without all the tweak that need to be done, and not to mention proper drivers, i can easily see 40mega on quark for a 1080 and 30mega for a 1070

those gpu with those number on decred, can make it once again profitable with lower consumption, pretty beastly, i can not wait to make a rig with those

Dont expect much more with quark - overclocked it was 35000 - maybe with private kernel it might be more overclocked

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

so someone bought the 1080, for testing how the hashrate is in all the algo?

For 1080
Decred 3200
Lyrarev2 16000
Quark 32000
Neosrypt and etherium needs clarifying - maybe will be bound to linux on release - cant tell the numbers yet
All is at 180w
1070(maybe it will change a bit)
Decred 2300
Quark 23000
At 120w

good, this of course is without all the tweak that need to be done, and not to mention proper drivers, i can easily see 40mega on quark for a 1080 and 30mega for a 1070

those gpu with those number on decred, can make it once again profitable with lower consumption, pretty beastly, i can not wait to make a rig with those

vaulter

full member

Activity: 174

Merit: 100