Pages:
Author

Topic: How will this change the world of mining?? GTX 1080 / 1070 - page 39. (Read 134091 times)

hero member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 783
Reward: 10M Shen (Approx. 5000 BNB) Bounty
Don't know how this will affect altcoins, specifically ETH mining but Videocardz has a post up about 1080 specs and it breaks down Bitcoin mining vs 980TI and R9 Fury X.

1080 - 1056.438 mHash
980ti - 769.191 mHash
R9 Fury X - 857.575 mHash

If that scales, in theory the 1070 for $380 might beat the R9 Fury X in the above instance.



That is for "bitcoin" mining which does not need much memory access. The Ethereum needs a lot of memory access.
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 508
Don't know how this will affect altcoins, specifically ETH mining but Videocardz has a post up about 1080 specs and it breaks down Bitcoin mining vs 980TI and R9 Fury X.

1080 - 1056.438 mHash
980ti - 769.191 mHash
R9 Fury X - 857.575 mHash

If that scales, in theory the 1070 for $380 might beat the R9 Fury X in the above instance.

legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
i've read that because of the memory bus of these gpu, they will not be good for etheruem, is this true? would be a major let down for me
Not because of the bus - there is still hope for much improvement if what i've heard is true - it might be 20mhs on 120w on 1070 but as for now it seems very dull
As for amd - I think we will see same 20mhs at 150w with polaris

Nah i don't think so. My nano's use 75w for 22Mh/s. So i doubt polaris will be the same Smiley
full member
Activity: 174
Merit: 100
i've read that because of the memory bus of these gpu, they will not be good for etheruem, is this true? would be a major let down for me
Not because of the bus - there is still hope for much improvement if what i've heard is true - it might be 20mhs on 120w on 1070 but as for now it seems very dull
As for amd - I think we will see same 20mhs at 150w with polaris
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
Seems that the 1080 is performing very well for "Bitcoin" mining.

I'm curious to see what the effect is on other algo's....

Reference:
http://www.overclock.net/t/1600173/compubench-gtx-1080-and-gtx-980ti-compute-performance


so 15% more than FuryX and 25% more than 980TI  mmmmmm

Not on every test though.

Fury X scores better on the ocean surface test and the video composition test.

I've seen other Fury x tests (oc'ed) where it owns the 1080 in almost every test.
On the other hand, the 1080 oc'ed will likely score better again when oc'ed.

AMD is announcing Polaris at computex . I'm curious Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
Seems that the 1080 is performing very well for "Bitcoin" mining.

I'm curious to see what the effect is on other algo's....

Reference:
http://www.overclock.net/t/1600173/compubench-gtx-1080-and-gtx-980ti-compute-performance


so 15% more than FuryX and 25% more than 980TI  mmmmmm
full member
Activity: 229
Merit: 100
Seems that the 1080 is performing very well for "Bitcoin" mining.

I'm curious to see what the effect is on other algo's....

Reference:
http://www.overclock.net/t/1600173/compubench-gtx-1080-and-gtx-980ti-compute-performance
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
The world of mining will be changed to.... AMD?  Roll Eyes

 It already is for Ethereum, but Ethereum isn't the only coin to mine with GPUs out there.





not true, 970 are very good for etheruem on par if not better than amd, mine work at 22 mega with 160w only, you can also find them for 230 euro now on the market, probably less if they are not customs like g1 gaming
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
The world of mining will be changed to.... AMD?  Roll Eyes

 It already is for Ethereum, but Ethereum isn't the only coin to mine with GPUs out there.



legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 1022
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
i've read that because of the memory bus of these gpu, they will not be good for etheruem, is this true? would be a major let down for me
full member
Activity: 174
Merit: 100
They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.
NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade.  How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining?

In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right?

You mean 650KH/s  Grin

how so, the guy said 12. mega which is still bad, but 650 is worse than a bad joke...

I don't know who 'this guy' is but I saw it with my own eyes.

vaulter the guy who posted the hashrate with 1080 before everyone else, in this thread

Sorry guys - its bad news so far - I was wrong about 12.5mhs - I just couldnt belive it would be... 1.25mhs - its because tlb - i'll try to find out if they can fix this or not...
It might be the same reason why neoscrypt is 0.450mhs but im not sure...

what % it report in the bus interface, using gpu-z?
50 on current DAG
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.
NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade.  How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining?

In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right?

You mean 650KH/s  Grin

how so, the guy said 12. mega which is still bad, but 650 is worse than a bad joke...

I don't know who 'this guy' is but I saw it with my own eyes.

vaulter the guy who posted the hashrate with 1080 before everyone else, in this thread

Sorry guys - its bad news so far - I was wrong about 12.5mhs - I just couldnt belive it would be... 1.25mhs - its because tlb - i'll try to find out if they can fix this or not...
It might be the same reason why neoscrypt is 0.450mhs but im not sure...

what % it report in the bus interface, using gpu-z?
newbie
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
Maybe the nVidia cards needs more miner optimisation. Does it mean our old AMD cards can last longer?
sr. member
Activity: 736
Merit: 262
Me, Myself & I
The world of mining will be changed to.... AMD?  Roll Eyes
full member
Activity: 174
Merit: 100
They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.
NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade.  How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining?

In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right?

You mean 650KH/s  Grin

how so, the guy said 12. mega which is still bad, but 650 is worse than a bad joke...

I don't know who 'this guy' is but I saw it with my own eyes.

vaulter the guy who posted the hashrate with 1080 before everyone else, in this thread

Sorry guys - its bad news so far - I was wrong about 12.5mhs - I just couldnt belive it would be... 1.25mhs - its because tlb - i'll try to find out if they can fix this or not...
It might be the same reason why neoscrypt is 0.450mhs but im not sure...
sr. member
Activity: 438
Merit: 250
They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.
NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade.  How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining?

In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right?

You mean 650KH/s  Grin

how so, the guy said 12. mega which is still bad, but 650 is worse than a bad joke...

I don't know who 'this guy' is but I saw it with my own eyes.

vaulter the guy who posted the hashrate with 1080 before everyone else, in this thread

Yes and I'm is the guy who wrote the ethash CUDA kernel and studied effects of TLB trashing for about a year now and made it an agenda point at nvidia dev teams. I know what I did, I kind of saw this coming too. And i also know that there is a chance that it will get fixed this time. And then we may even see speeds well beyond 19.6MH/s, which it what 1080 currently clocks with a 1GB DAG file.

based on what you know how much  they might be pushed if everything is fixed? 30MH?

I can't tell. 19.6MH/s at least, 40MH/s in theory (320GB/s of bandwidth divided by 8KB of DAG data per hash)
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.
NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade.  How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining?

In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right?

You mean 650KH/s  Grin

how so, the guy said 12. mega which is still bad, but 650 is worse than a bad joke...

I don't know who 'this guy' is but I saw it with my own eyes.

vaulter the guy who posted the hashrate with 1080 before everyone else, in this thread

Yes and I'm is the guy who wrote the ethash CUDA kernel and studied effects of TLB trashing for about a year now and made it an agenda point at nvidia dev teams. I know what I did, I kind of saw this coming too. And i also know that there is a chance that it will get fixed this time. And then we may even see speeds well beyond 19.6MH/s, which it what 1080 currently clocks with a 1GB DAG file.

based on what you know how much  they might be pushed if everything is fixed? 30MH?
sr. member
Activity: 438
Merit: 250
They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.
NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade.  How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining?

In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right?

You mean 650KH/s  Grin

how so, the guy said 12. mega which is still bad, but 650 is worse than a bad joke...

I don't know who 'this guy' is but I saw it with my own eyes.

vaulter the guy who posted the hashrate with 1080 before everyone else, in this thread

Yes and I'm is the guy who wrote the ethash CUDA kernel and studied effects of TLB trashing for about a year now and made it an agenda point at nvidia dev teams. I know what I did, I kind of saw this coming too. And i also know that there is a chance that it will get fixed this time. And then we may even see speeds well beyond 19.6MH/s, which it what 1080 currently clocks with a 1GB DAG file.
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.
NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade.  How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining?

In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right?

You mean 650KH/s  Grin

how so, the guy said 12. mega which is still bad, but 650 is worse than a bad joke...

I don't know who 'this guy' is but I saw it with my own eyes.

vaulter the guy who posted the hashrate with 1080 before everyone else, in this thread
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
I'd still like to see what F@H PPD are like out of a GTX 1080 and a GTX 1070.

Pages:
Jump to: