Topic: How will this change the world of mining?? GTX 1080 / 1070 - page 40. (Read 134091 times)

Quote from: Genoil on May 13, 2016, 07:42:48 PM

They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.

NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade. How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining?

In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right?

You mean 650KH/s Grin

how so, the guy said 12. mega which is still bad, but 650 is worse than a bad joke...

I don't know who 'this guy' is but I saw it with my own eyes.

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.

NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade. How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining?

In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right?

You mean 650KH/s Grin

how so, the guy said 12. mega which is still bad, but 650 is worse than a bad joke...

Genoil

sr. member

Activity: 438

Merit: 250

Quote from: Amph on May 13, 2016, 01:50:16 AM

They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.

NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade. How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining?

In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right?

You mean 650KH/s Grin

Genoil

sr. member

Activity: 438

Merit: 250

They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.

NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade. How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining?

In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right?

geonoil said it has to do with with the bus interface thing, i asked him to see if it is at 0%, no response

it can probably be proved with the right tool

!!!

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: vaulter on May 12, 2016, 03:40:44 PM

They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.

NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade. How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining?

In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right?

geonoil said it has to do with with the bus interface thing, i asked him to see if it is at 0%, no response

it can probably be improved with the right tool

adaseb

legendary

Activity: 3808

Merit: 1723

Up to 300% + 200 FS deposit bonuses

Quote from: vaulter on May 12, 2016, 07:32:47 AM

Quote from: sp_ on May 12, 2016, 06:07:23 AM

I think its around 15mhs

This is sp-mod opensource release 62 mining lyra2v2 (980ti 1275MHZ core)

The sp-mod private #5 does 16.2MHASH at the same clocks.

I'll check 62 later and report, will try to overclock it as well

Ive got 16.3 at 180W without OC and 80 build

Can you test the ethminer speeds ?

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.

NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade. How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining?

In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right?

iglasses

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1000

Quote from: vaulter on May 12, 2016, 07:32:47 AM

They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.

NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade. How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining?

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Nice. Can you test lyra2re. The 780ti does 2,9 MHASH with the djm34 kernal.

https://m.reddit.com/r/vertcoin/comments/3caf57/new_version_of_lyra2_fopr_nvidia_card/

vaulter

full member

Activity: 174

Merit: 100

Quote from: sp_ on May 12, 2016, 06:07:23 AM

Quote from: QuintLeo on May 08, 2016, 03:55:59 AM

I think its around 15mhs

This is sp-mod opensource release 62 mining lyra2v2 (980ti 1275MHZ core)

The sp-mod private #5 does 16.2MHASH at the same clocks.

I'll check 62 later and report, will try to overclock it as well

Ive got 16.3 at 180W without OC and 80 build

kahir

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1000

More like 40% more speed at half the power of current NVidia cards used in mining, from the early benchmarks I've been seeing, *IF* their mining potential matches their increased clockrate.

Have to see if the changes to the archetecture make them more efficient on some coins that current higher-end NVidia cards do NOT mine efficiently on like Ethereum.

mining is never compared to gaming preformance wise its just impossible to compare them head to head

Grim

sr. member

Activity: 506

Merit: 252

I would actually love to see at what vram amount the tlb starts to trash.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/assessing-the-impact-of-tlb-trashing-on-memory-hard-algorhitms-1268355

With this tool from Genoil you should be able to test it:

https://github.com/Genoil/dagSimCL

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

vaulter did you tried this?

Quote from: Genoil on May 11, 2016, 03:59:27 AM

12.5MH/s sounds like good 'ol TLB trashing. If there is a Linux or WDDM 1.x driver (Win 7 or 8.1), I would suggest installing that and try again. Knowing that the 980ti does about 6MH/s currenty while trashing, we may be in for a surprise.

Check Bus Interface Load in GPU-Z. Should be close to 0%. When TLB trashing it becomes high, around 50-60%.

vaulter

full member

Activity: 174

Merit: 100

Quote from: sp_ on May 12, 2016, 06:07:23 AM

I think its around 15mhs

This is sp-mod opensource release 62 mining lyra2v2 (980ti 1275MHZ core)

The sp-mod private #5 does 16.2MHASH at the same clocks.

I'll check 62 later and report, will try to overclock it as well

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

i think there is no point in comparison now, better to wait for proper driver and proper code, before comparing, i can bet my ass that they are way faster and consume less

it's always like that with new generation

QuintLeo

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1030

12.5 isn't impressive at all though - now that I've got my HD 7870 running, it's pulling very close to that (12.05 with occasional bumps up to 12.3) on Ethereum - on the other hand, my best estimate is that it's eating about 100 watts at the wall (massively overkill Seasonic X1250 (gold) running the system right now) which isn't competative.

Pretty sad that a 2 Gig 5ish year old design card is pretty much matching the throughput of NVidia's latest and greatest - though could be early days pre-release drivers aren't optimised yet.

I was just looking at my local Craigslist, see a 7870 listed for $90 and a pair of R9 270 (same except single 6-pin connector instead of 2 + updated BIOS) for $160. I'm being tempted......

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer