Topic: I no longer work for Butterfly Labs (BFL) - page 4. (Read 21146 times)

You misunderstand.

First, the forum does not use scammer tags.

Second, you're the one claiming BFL are effectively scammers which is why the thread was moved here. Apart from BFL staff/affiliated people, no one here is actually calling you the scammer.

As that Nibbknot called me a liar in another thread I withdraw my support for his story. You meany you.

remember when they promised to do burn testing on testnet?

haha, as if it will ever happen.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             

How will I get a scammer tag? I read and commented on some guy here who even had a hard time paying for a scammer tag. Do they really give scammer tags to people on this forum for those trying to help but not to those who work shill for a company? And why are you helping butterfly labs so much especially since you know so much more than me and can easily help the other bitcoin guys here?

I have helped more with the three days that I have been here with only 40 posts then you have with being here almost a year with your 1331 posts. 6 more posts and you would be elite status. 1 more post my me and I get a 10% discount at some restaurant located somewhere in the galaxy.

Statements like this make me think more and more you are either more clueless than Bick or you never worked there.  There were only 2 types of units that came back from hosting... RMAs and Units customers no longer wanted hosted and were sent in to be shipped out the them.  Bick's dumb enough to believe that equipment that is still earning more than the cost of electricity to run them would be returned to be scrapped.  Then of course there's this gem:
My first thought reading this was a Wizard of Oz reference... "I don't think we're in Kansas anymore Toto" and "Lions and tigers and bears OH MY!".  But wow, even the people in customer service aren't this clueless.  Off-site testing?  Bwahahahahaha.  Your lies are getting more and more ludicrous, pretty soon you will earn that scammer tag you thought they gave you...

I would like Luke to answer this.

But it is possible he may not.

"Burn testing" should have been done on testnet. It should have produced the same results from a hardware standpoint.

Now I feel better. Thanks. The thread was only moved to a new section and has nothing to do with me being a scammer that was only said by Josh. But Josh said it on his forum not on this forum. Still confused but think I understand. Thanks again.

This sub forum and the thread being moved here does not mean you're the scammer.  I shouldn't speak for the mods but the sub this was originally in is technically for technical issues.  If the thread is about the hardware manufacture scamming it's customers then this is technically the right sub for it to be in.

It's kinda weird here, threads go massively OT and aren't moderated, some threads stay in the wrong sub for ever or too long, some get moved right away.  I think the mods do the best they can but nothing is perfect.

I wouldn't take this as the forums accusing you of being the scammer.  If I remember correctly Josh on the BFL forum said you were the scammer.  I don't remember anyone here giving a rats ass about the bitcents someone gave you.

I concur that the miners were probably only tested for a few hours at their other facility (come to think of it it might have been at butterfly labs dedicated hosting companies). We put them in vans. Several days later the miners arrive at the testing facility. They are tested for a couple of hours. Then they are put back in the vans and delivered back to the plant arriving several days later. Reason? The traffic is terrible in KC. Oh My!

I cant imagine how much they paid PG. He is the worst troll ever and not a peep from him.

This is so sad! Now I'm labeled as a scammer when all I was trying to do is help you guys. This is one reason why I can't give my real name because somebody on this forum can claim stuff about me and it will be on the internet for ever. I am so mad now!

I come here and tell the truth and am labeled a scammer. Butterfly labs misuses millions of dollars of other peoples money and is not. What kind of place is this forum anyway?

A lot of units were going through testing some in the glassed room at the entrance and some in the semi trailer backed up to the loading dock where Bruce first worked when he was first hired. A whole bunch were sent to the butterfly lab's other facility (not one of their warehouses) in which Bruce should know where that one is. After the long testing period the miners were sent back to us where they were packaged and mailed out to customers. Later some of those miners starting coming back to us and were unpacked inspected and resent out to new customers. Jody handled that aspect mostly making sure the labeling was correct. Tense times it was then. Eventually there were so many people at the plant we all had trouble just working around each other. It was like a three ring circus. New product made and sent out for testing. Testing miners back at the plant to be shipped out. Miners sent out being shipped backed to be replaced and some not even opened then sent out to new people. Some of them the parts were taken off and used on other miners and the process started all over again.

Around March or early April a whole bunch of miners came back to the plant from some hosting company in KC probably because they were replaced with the upgraded models we were making. It makes perfect sense to me to replace 65nm miners with new 65nm miners now that it was explained what was REALLY produced back in February.   (hope this smiley works)

The correct answer to this is either:
Yes, I was being paid by BFL.
or
No, I was not being paid by BFL.

If I read the posts correctly in another thread Josh was the one who took the pictures thus trying to give Luke more cred.

[quote author = The Churchlady]
Next witness please.  Could it be ... SATAN!?
[/quote]

Quite the shameless mercenary, huh ?

Anyone remember that 10k BTC bet by Matthew N. Wright? He lost and doubled everyones wager by multiplying the amount by two and putting the number into a spreadsheet. His wording was: "Post in this thread how much you're committing and I will double that amount you commit"

I just remembered that story when reading about the infamous "BFL will deliver"-bet in this thread. Pretty much the same... Of course you can say MNW was right and of course you can say BFL delivered, but, well...  Don't be surprised if no one wants to bet with you again or people are saying your credibility is going down. Because you can interpret EVERY statement in the way you want, but just because you can does not mean you should.

Whether they are or aren't has no effect on me.

You better hope those legal documents which seem to imply their burn in was well above a few hours are wrong