Topic: ICO without whitepaper - page 26. (Read 7656 times)
I think ICO without whitepaper will come out with accusations that the project is a scam, because a whitepaper is important for a project, to explain the details of a project such as the purpose of making the project, roadmap, vision mission and many more things
Who is crazy to trust a project without any white paper, especially when it's about money?
I think that such an ICO will be more difficult to recruit investors. I wouldn't participate in such a project
I can say that any ICO without a whitepaper has the tendencey of being a scam and as such should be avoided like a plague
i automatically assume that a project without a proper whitepaper is a scam
Yes I agree, even if a lot if ICO's with a whitepaper are scams too
but it's a good thing to be sure it's not a "easy scam" lol
Every crypto project must have such a document. Personally, I have not yet seen crypto projects that I was interested in without white paper. The white paper contains basic information about the technical characteristics of the project, which is the main one in the crypto project.
i automatically assume that a project without a proper whitepaper is a scam
I will never invest in an ICO with no whitepaper ! the goal of the whitepaper is too show you WHY you HAVE to invest money in this project and not in another one.
If the team is too lazy to write a whitepaper to talk about their project ... how can I trust them ?
If the team is too lazy to write a whitepaper to talk about their project ... how can I trust them ?
With my own understanding ico without white paper don't worth investing on because you won't know what there project is up too so I can't ever advice someone to invest in an ico without white paper
Because I want to think, ICOs that don't distribute whitepapers then ICOs cannot be trusted. It implies that the ICO is not joking in making this task win. ICO without whitepaper is a cheat. Whitepapers are a medium worth crossing between organizations and speculators. Without a whitepaper, financial specialists cannot understand and know the ICO clearly and deeply.
if the project plans to make whitepaper follow them but if not, better ignore it I have not seen projects without whitepaper succeed. unless they only play their own rotation market so be careful.
Not a single normal ICO without technical documentation can not be, because a technical document is an important part of the ICO.
More like Yes. I would not invest in an ICO project with an incomplete road map, in the rating lists it will be in the outsiders in advance.
ICO absence whitepaper as does something that doesn't have a life. many who sometimes rely on to monitor the whitepaper in advance for choosing to invest in ICO. If the absence will certainly be whitepaper quite doubtful though not necessarily to it is a scam.
If the project does not want to share information and plans with potential investors and participants, it is almost always a scam that does not deserve my money.
ICO reviews are actually helpful, I usually take a love ok on reviews before engaging on a project. There were information that was not stated in whitepaper that will make you double think wether you'll be investing on it. Well, many reviews are also made by the team making them good standing in the people. But even all good things abiut the project are shown there wilk be still negative feedback you'll see at the comment section which helps you to decide. Its a wise strategy to get into a great project, it takes a lot of reading to find one.
It's better to avoid ICOs that don't have whitepapers. Because it shows that the project is not serious and has the potential to be a scam. All of that is to protect your funds so that they are not lost when participating in an ICO that has the potential to be a scam.
Actually the ICO without whitepaper is not necessarily fraud, it's just that ICO without whitepaper can't be trusted. How we want to believe if we cannot know the ICO in depth. I myself, if I meet with the ICO without a whitepaper, I will not join in, I will not invest and I will not join the bounty campaign. I'm better off avoiding me following uncertainty so I will only be at risk of suffering losses. This whitepaper is a practical medium to get to know ICO so that if there is no whitepaper then we will not be able to get to know the ICO.
I think the ICO with out whitepaper is ni basis of a project because inside a whitepaper is very important becuase of a roadmaps and when listed a coin.
I am absolutely sure that the project without this document is highly likely to be a fraud. Therefore, I do not plan to invest my money in it.
Jump to: