Topic: ICO without whitepaper - page 29. (Read 7656 times)
ICO without a white paper is unlikely to achieve successful financing, but now the fraudsters will make white papers because it is very cheap and easy to make!
I'd never invest my money in a project I can't entirely know about. Whitepaper is an absolute minimum to understand what goal the developers pursue.
As an investor, one important thing that we look on is the Whitepaper. Coz everything is in there like the concept of the coin, their vision and long term goal, it has all the details about the project, intriduction about the people behind it. It is also effective for marketing and promoting a coin or project. So if an ICO has no whitepaper, then that will intrigue me and i would think that 80% it is a scam.
Without whitepaper ICO is incomplete. No ICO will collect $ 1 without technical documentation.I think this is a very important condition for a successful ICO
This depends on the particular project and the whole group behind the project. In the ICO, White Paper is a detailed document that provides information about the company's mission, strategy, specifications, technology, etc. to give investors an overview of the project. make an investment decision or not. In addition, important side effects such as the financial model of legal issues and the roadmap clearly reflected in the white paper are also important for investors to evaluate the project more accurately.
of course it is very risky to be trusted, whitepaper is the key to the collection of information that can be accessed by potential investors, there investors can find out what information about the concept and purpose and benefits of the project they offer
on the off chance that there is an ICO without whitepaper I will expect a trick. without a whitepaper how financial specialists will see how their item or task functions. there will be a hole amongst financial specialists and ICO on the off chance that they don't give whitepapers. particularly if not outfitted with a qualified group and consultant. this is clearly a venture that does not truly deal with and does not join significance to speculators. however, presently infrequently discover ICO without whitepaper.
Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper
The White Paper serves as a more detailed explanation of the project that will be introduced, so it feels if an ICO project without a White paper seems to be less professional and should be questioned about the clarity of the project.without it, it's like we are believing sometimes that comes out of random person brain without knowing whether that could be realized or not and that will be a waste of money.
As I would like to think, there is no white paper ico, regardless of whether it's anything but a trick, I won't contribute, on the grounds that the white paper is an outline for a task. Set out to ask which venture does not have a white paper?
Maybe some of ICOs without whitepaper not a scam but who will invest in start-up which can not say about itself nothing. Investors want to maximum information before invest their money.
That is so strange and I have not seen that before. This means investors won't be interested in these kinds of projects and it is more likely to fail. I personally wont waste time around such projects.
Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper
The White Paper serves as a more detailed explanation of the project that will be introduced, so it feels if an ICO project without a White paper seems to be less professional and should be questioned about the clarity of the project.
There are quite a few ICOs on the market that are quite promising and they do not have white papers, if a project is very good and there is good communication sometimes it is not so necessary at the beginning, you can postpone it for a while to give priority to other things, the developers almost always observe well waht the community asks for , they should always be attentive to satisfy and have a priority list, although I think they should have one before the end of the ICO, I do not consider it so necessary for the beginning of it
Most likely-Yes, in order not to lose your money, see that the ICO projects contain all the technical characteristics and contants for communication with the development team.
Whitepaper is important for investor to understand the vision and the goals of a project and many other information about the Team, token etc.
It is very important for investors in decision making process
It is very important for investors in decision making process
ICO without whitpper means team has no vision and they are just start ICO for fraud people because whitepaper has the planning, roadmap and legal information etc.
how someone can trust ico without whitepaper.
how someone can trust ico without whitepaper.
I consider that ICO without WhitePaper will definitely make me think over and do not trust to the project. The key attention choosing the project I pay to the WP, how the technical side is represented and how informative and realistic it is.
Every self-respecting project team simply has to write White Paper.
This is the main technical document telling investors about their project.
This is the main technical document telling investors about their project.
If you come across such an ICO, then just close their website. Such ICO I do not recommend the choice, no matter how beautifully they describe the project.
The white paper usually gives an overview of the project. The problem the team has identified and how it warns to tackle. Am just wondering how intending investors will be able to do a due diligence if a project does not have a whitepaper . I will look at it with a lot doubt
Jump to: