Topic: ICO without whitepaper - page 46. (Read 7656 times)
ICO reviews are actually helpful, I usually take a love ok on reviews before engaging on a project. There were information that was not stated in whitepaper that will make you double think wether you'll be investing on it. Well, many reviews are also made by the team making them good standing in the people. But even all good things abiut the project are shown there wilk be still negative feedback you'll see at the comment section which helps you to decide. Its a wise strategy to get into a great project, it takes a lot of reading to find one.
Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper
I will advice everyone to stay away from any project doing ICO without whitepaper, it shows the project is not legit enough to invest on. My opinion
An ICO without a whitepaper will never succeed. No investor would give millions of their money to a project that can't even explain what their project does. there is no point participating in a bounty for a project without a whitepaper either, because the project will fail and if you somehow do still get paid, the coins will be worthless anyway.
Whitepaper-less ICO is a kind of stupidity. White paper is an integral part of any project. If it is not there, then almost always says that this project is not sufficiently developed, and you should avoid investing it.
Nowadays ICOs come with more extended versions of whitepapers, like a business plan and lightpapers. I can not see that a ICO who wants to succeed come without whitepaper. It is one of the indispensable factors of a new project on the blockchain.
Most of the ICO project in the whitepaper. So whitepaper important of the project. Most of the project information in the whitepaper. People before invest the project check the whitepaper. Then people get the more information of the ICO project. If not in the project it a scam.
So check the project whitepaper. This information help to choose the best ICO project for invest.
So check the project whitepaper. This information help to choose the best ICO project for invest.
how can a whitepaper not be owned, it is ascertained that the ico does not have a whitepaper is certainly a scam.
Agree, But there are scam projects which has white paper also. White paper is not the only thing we can rely on the originality of a project and there are several factors included like the partnership, product, team and roadmap. We need to take into consideration on all aspect and not only white paper to identify whether the project is a good one. White paper is also a main factor towards that but there should be other main factors inside the project for success.
how can we know ico in detail, if there is no whitepaper, so what will they plan and do? do we want to give our money to something that is not clear, can we believe it? I can not imagine it if ico without a whitepaper, it's like giving away our money to the person who just met on the highway.
Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper
mostly airdrop without white paper. but for ico it is very rarely excluded in the group of new wallet project managers or dll. I think white paper is very important to bridge on investors.
Essentially, if it does not make sense you should ignore it.
Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper
you can not know whether it's scam or only incompetent, but either way, very likely your investment will end up being worth zero. If they can't even write white paper, then I'm not sure how they would deliver actual product.
I never found an ICO without whitepaper, if exist then maybe this must be scam. A whitepaper introduced what's all about on an ICO project that investors need to know. This serves as the guidelines what's the platforms for and what its uses. The first thing to look by the investors is this whitepaper of a project.
I've never met one, to be honest. Better not trust, invest or participate in such bounties. This is for your own safety, because the chance of losing money in this case as much as possible.
The white paper goes a long way to identify and defines a project and help a potential investor to know exactly what the project is all about and how they could benefit from it. A project without a white paper is undefined.
Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper
how can someone make an ico without whitepaper? i would not trust such an ico. a whitepaper is today rather the normal standard instead of a special feature. who can not keep this standard, should not lead a ico or company. but thats just my opinion.
I am very skeptical about projects that can not immediately submit their project of work. How can I invest money in such projects I do not understand. The only thing that can attract me to such a project is the insanely known specialists who can show a good example of work from their past projects.
Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper
I am not worried when I see ICO that hasn’t whitepaper. There should be some necessary information on the site or maybe in some other documents. That’s not a problem. The problem is that ICO project could be a scam.
I will be surprised if there is still any ICO in the crypto space that is without whitepaper, because all those i have seen have their, both legit and scam projects. There are even some airdrops that have whitepaper, so what would stop an ICO from having it.
I think if ico not have whitepaper or if it stolen from other it can be scam. But also if progect not have whitepaper it not ico - it like money piramid.
Whitepaper is a necessary document to have. All ICO need to have the whitepaper.
But it is not a guarantee!
Even if the ICO has the whitepaper, it can be a scam project. you should make your research before picking any project and do not invest into any project that does not have whitepaper
Yes, what is important is the authenticity of the project. The white paper alone can not be fully understood. It is necessary to assess the maneuverability of the project in all aspects.But it is not a guarantee!
Even if the ICO has the whitepaper, it can be a scam project. you should make your research before picking any project and do not invest into any project that does not have whitepaper
Jump to: