Topic: ICO without whitepaper - page 41. (Read 7656 times)
me myself have never found ico that does not have a whitepaper, try to ask the ic devs about the whitepaper, because this is very suspicious, and if it turns out your question is not addressed means that ico is a scam
Im not focus on whitepaper, sometime i dont even look the whitepaper becauseni cant tell the project real existing. Easy create an awesome whitepaper but the reality is shit. What my point is before reading whiepaper make sure the team are all in existence developing the project out there then nexr move in whitpaper
I suggest to read the whitepaper, this is because all the details of the project are there, if ICO without whitepaper then it is like living without water, which will not die long.ICO without white paper should be suspicious at once. This is a very important document that needs to be analyzed before investing in ICO. The issues in white paper are very important for investors both in terms of technology and time planning.
In my opinion, we should not trust such projects . there are projects which documents all right and are moshenikami .
Investors are more securing with their money to invest, if the project of ICO is without whitepaper you think its legit i simply say this, that this is nothing this is scam how would you know the technical informations of this project.
Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper
Exactly I agree the whitepaper for ICO bridges the gap between investors and team or company. But it doesn't mean that without having whitepaper the ICO is scam.
The most important thing for ICOs are MVP(Minimum viable product). MVP is very important to see whether the ICO can acheive success in future or not. MVP determines that whether the team has capacity or capability to build product what they are promising.
So be careful before choosing any ICO for investment purposes.
In this forum the most important for you is to earn from the bounty campaign you entered, what if you join the ICO without whitepaper you think you can earn from it its a big no why? How would you know all the informations the plan, the teams who run this project there is no investors who want to invest from this so this is not legit.
Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper
I treat such projects with caution. No matter what is missing - white paper, or the project has no site, or you can not see the team - it always means it's a problematic project. 
Never joined ico without have whitepaper, how to know is great ico or not if the ico project do not have whitepaper, by reading whitepaper on ico project we know what the vision of ico project, when their ico listed on exchange market, how much token sale to public.
What is your basis how come that this become legit, we all knew that whitepaper content a lot of information there is technical information of an ICO the teams and devs without this the probability is scam so be careful of this.
I would not say it is a scam but for me ICO without whitepaper is just a red flag for people who want to scam money using ICOs.
Even though it has a nice whitepaper many ICOs are still scam and cannot deliver what they promised on that whitepaper.
For me this is just one of many indicator to verify genuine ICOs
Even though it has a nice whitepaper many ICOs are still scam and cannot deliver what they promised on that whitepaper.
For me this is just one of many indicator to verify genuine ICOs
Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper
I'd rather stay away from ICOs in general, they are unestablished project so it is way more risky to invest in them than to invest on cryptocurrencies directly, ICO without a whitepaper is even more riskier, how do you even know the vision and mission of the project? 
Im not focus on whitepaper, sometime i dont even look the whitepaper becauseni cant tell the project real existing. Easy create an awesome whitepaper but the reality is shit. What my point is before reading whiepaper make sure the team are all in existence developing the project out there then nexr move in whitpaper
I suggest to read the whitepaper, this is because all the details of the project are there, if ICO without whitepaper then it is like living without water, which will not die long.Im not focus on whitepaper, sometime i dont even look the whitepaper becauseni cant tell the project real existing. Easy create an awesome whitepaper but the reality is shit. What my point is before reading whiepaper make sure the team are all in existence developing the project out there then nexr move in whitpaper
I suggest to read the whitepaper, this is because all the details of the project are there, if ICO without whitepaper then it is like living without water, which will not die long.
It's better to get away from this ICO, because it's a pure scam. Technical documentation is a necessary part of any ICO, and all progress of any ICO depends on their technical document.
The whitepaper of any project will highlight the roadmap and what they plan to achieve in the following years. Therefore, if a project did not have a whitepaper then the project doesn't have any plan and its tantamount to the fact that the project is a scam.
In whitepaper is everything about project, ico without whitepaper is not professional but I think you can do ico without whitepaper, everything can be written on site. Don't worry too much about it, every ICO has whitepaper. It is not good indicator because you can buy professionally made whitepaper.
n my opinion ICO without whitepaper is fake, because all the details of ICO only exist in whitepaper, and if indeed there is no whitepaper how? many people are less understanding with the ICO project and certainly also many investors who do not believe in the ICO
ICO without whitepaper in my opinion is not valid, because whitepaper is an important part in an ICO, because investors will not be interested if there is no whitepaper. and this ICO progress depends on their whitepaper, so the role of whitepaper in an ICO is very important
of course it does jkt sem to be valid, i believe that you need to learn z lot before investing, how can you do it wothout whitepaper Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper
that is so strange to imagnr ico wothout whiteoaper, i lways read them as i think it is important very much for futprther
ICO without whitepaper in my opinion is not valid, because whitepaper is an important part in an ICO, because investors will not be interested if there is no whitepaper. and this ICO progress depends on their whitepaper, so the role of whitepaper in an ICO is very important
Jump to: