DooMAD went to one of those sites that produces a political philosophy profile and I think this is a useful taxonomy. CoinCube would I guess be on the right, upper quadrant. Eric S Raymond would be closer to me I think.
The view of the world through the eyes of Anonymint:
The only "justifiable" standpoint in your view is at the very "right" of the chart from your (literally) skewed perspective. Everyone and everything else is communist. Your bitter tone implies frustration that the rest of the world doesn't share this perspective. So you lash out at all the "leftists" even though you apparently mean to include people who would be viewed as right by those on the left. The only ones who aren't "leftists" are the hardline libertarians. The average person will never see it, but in your world Hitler and Gandhi are two peas in a pod. Augusto Pinochet and the Dalai Lama are equally authoritarian. They're all communists.
Thank you. I think that chart is a reasonably accurate representation of my perspective. Thank for putting in the effort to make that.
I don't think it is accurate to say that I wouldn't praise some of the traits of those who are on the same side of either axis as myself, even though they are on the other side of the other axis from values. So while I might condone some of the social liberalism of Gandhi, I would disagree with the economic totalitarianism. Ditto while I admire some of Thatcher's views, I wouldn't agree with totalitarian restriction of social values. Having said that, I do admire some conservative social values, such as I think abortion and birth control are self-destructive on a statistical basis, but I am not going to join some religion which tries to control the freewill of people.
Note however, there is distinction between having these values and needing to interact in a society that for the most part doesn't share these values.
My values free me from needing to control what other people do on a societal level (might be different in my interpersonal relationships). Economic right means I accept the natural law will impact the outcome, so nothing I need to control. Ditto my interpretation of social liberalism is that we all reap what we sow. Abort your children, you'll likely end up in a life lacking meaning.
And r0ach and I contrasting our different perspectives...
being required to be a suicidal nihilist, which is a demographic that doesn't reproduce well either, breeding themselves out of existence by whoever is dumb enough to adopt it.
R strategy could be quite effective. I could have fathered dozens if not 100s of children by now, had I not restricted myself with condoms, withdrawal, and at times abstinence.
In which political quadrant do each of you subscribe:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17311269Just look at the quote: "Like anything else, nature is the best teacher". Human life is a story of the individual moseying around, then comes in contact with a collective group who kicks them in the face, forcing the individual into a collective group of their own in order to not go extinct. Jews practice all these blatantly obvious traits, which is why they're winning, while trying to impose Marxism on everyone else to prevent them from coming together for common interests to compete at all. They are also heavy into anarchism, except not for their own civilization, only to destabilize others to take them over.
Bitcoin isn't required to be a digital 666 tracking grid to be a trojan horse like you're always saying. It could just be a designed to collapse system they put up that acts the same way anarchy does to undermine power structures and then collapses, letting someone just walk in and impose some new system on top of it like a federated govt chain since none of these so called decentralized systems actually work.
Organization will always be a power vacuum. Sorry.
Your dream of the white man organizing to build a Babylon to defend against opportunists is just handing power to the opportunists. You won't find any solutions.
Evolution is just a chaotic soup. Fit in any where you wish, it won't matter. We are not that important. Comedy is therapeutic. My idea is try to enjoy life a bit, and care for the people who care for me.
r0ach, have fun trying to get your fellow lunatic white men to stand up unified and organized:
So you actually support eugenics?
(Aka what happens with those who cant pay for security and healthcare...
Typical leftist hysteria.
Equating personal responsibility with enabling eugenics.
Lunatics like this will definitely create another Holocaust.
Everything is privatized. What happens with those who cant pay for the service?
Lets take the PH as an example because you live there.
What does happen with them?
They end up on street selling their body, organs and kids.
Am i wrong or right?
They rely on extended family. You know something that is entirely gone from the culture of Europe where you send your parents off to die while you are in Southern Europe on a tanning vacation with your 2 months of mandated paid vacation and too busy to return home for their funeral. The Frankenstein Babylon that socialism has built.
Think again about my eugenics statement. What happens with people who have no extended family?
Do you think the weakest people in our society have something like a family helping them?
You are letting this people die and dont give a shit about them. You just dont want to admit it.
What a cold, dark, humanity if those who have lost all their extended family are not adopted and cared for by some family.
The leftist religion is all about replacing humanity (and love) with collective indebtedness, corruption, and rewarding non-production while penalizing production.