Pages:
Author

Topic: Investigation and action required. Unusual forum moderation. - page 2. (Read 933 times)

legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
That includes some of my own (Merited) posts in topics that weren't self-moderated, and Ratimov indeed should indeed not have any power over those.
[...]
I didn't realize until now that also Mods deleted topics with other users' posts. That's quite a big mistake.

I would argue that even self-mod threads that Ratimov cleaned out should be restored and locked, if that's not done already.

Not to mention that we've had people banned for less, whereas he's not getting even a slap on the wrist so that's kinda screwed up as far as disincentives to fuck with forum privileges.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Furthermore: how can xandry (which is just a mod, so not an admin) could check Ratimov's messages history?
I'm pretty sure this is a translation issue, and he must have meant his post history.

All of the deleted topics with replies have been restored to Archival.
Cool! So Guest R20231030 is Ratimov's new name Tongue

I checked this list, and those topics have been restored:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34.
That includes some of my own (Merited) posts in topics that weren't self-moderated, and Ratimov indeed should indeed not have any power over those.

All of the deleted topics with replies have been restored to Archival.
I didn't realize until now that also Mods deleted topics with other users' posts. That's quite a big mistake.
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
Thank you for coming to this thread, theymos.

If I am allowed, I would also add a few questions, as it follows:

1. Isn't this statement contradicting itself?

I see no evidence of misconduct, though it was incorrect to delete topics with substantial replies.

How could it be no misconduct, since it was incorrect to delete those topics? What is a misconduct then, if not taking incorrect decisions?

2. Since Ratimov was turning his old topics into garbage on purpose, then he moved his trash in the Russian local board, thus breaking forum rule no. 1 multiple times in a row, being very aware of what he is doing, why was he not banned for that? This question was addressed also by LV, but no answer has been provided so far:

Isn't that what bans are for? To stop people from posting garbage?

3. Since even Xal0lex started thinking that what Ratimov does is fishy, why did not he asked other mods for a ban, since he is unable to issue bans? Again, this question was also asked by LV and it was never been answered:

But you have a Mod board, in which you could report him to Mods with banning power. It's more than just deleting his own posts, it's moving garbage into your board. And that's a clear violation of the forum rules:
1. No zero or low value, pointless or uninteresting posts or threads.
He could easily have avoided all this by moving the topic to Archival, but he choose to throw his garbage topics on the board you moderate. This sets a precedent for using the board you moderate as a trashcan and by reporting his own posts there turns you into his personal trashman.

4. Why none of xandry and Xal0lex answered to questions, 3. and 4., although they were asked repeatedly?



All of the deleted topics with replies have been restored to Archival.

Thank you for restoring them.



~ probably used the "Show the last topics started by this person" function.
Even easier: Search topics. You can quickly find the very short topic titles, nicely kept in Archival.

Small question here (addressed to xandry):

I would not like to put the second moderator in a difficult position, but I was honestly surprised by the answer of Xal0lex:
I haven't personally counted how many topics I've deleted. Maybe 10, maybe more. And plus at the moment there are a few more of Ratimov's garbage topics in the section, which will also be deleted in time. You can go to the section yourself and see how many of these topics there are at the moment. You can also go to modlog and do the math yourself.
Once again: I found out about garbage topics only after I was mentioned and I started checking Radimov's message history. How could anyone have found out about this before? That there are many similar garbage topics in the Russian forum? After all, they are old and do not appear in the top of the Russian root. I didn't understand that.

If Halab and LV believe it was easy to find those topics, then why xandry thinks it was very difficult? It doesn't add up.

Furthermore: how can xandry (which is just a mod, so not an admin) could check Ratimov's messages history?

I found out about garbage topics only after I was mentioned and I started checking Radimov's message history

I believed this was something only admins can do.
legendary
Activity: 4116
Merit: 7849
'The right to privacy matters'
Xal0lex would you help us to understand how you found the topics/posts to clean up if they were not reported?

If you go to the root of the Russian section, you will see a list of topics at the bottom. So I saw two trash topics in this list. Naturally, I deleted them. And then I decided to go through the whole list and found a lot of such topics. Again, I deleted several topics. And then I realized that something was wrong and that it looked very suspicious, so I didn't touch those topics anymore.

I read all the posts and waited for a reply by you. My thoughts were you may have been tricked by mr r.

I just check the post after yours and its from mr t. his conclusion was exactly what I thought may have happened.

Hoping that mr r lets us know why he does what he does. as it put you in a shitty spot for sure.
administrator
Activity: 5166
Merit: 12850
I see no evidence of misconduct, though it was incorrect to delete topics with substantial replies. All of the deleted topics with replies have been restored to Archival.

Quote
[d.] He reports other's posts from the topics.
[e.] Moderators delete the reported posts because now these posts are irrelevant in the discussion

This didn't happen. In all of Ratmov's deleted topics, only 3 replies were deleted by moderators in the last 2 years, and none of these deletions were by xandry or Xal0lex.
staff
Activity: 2436
Merit: 2347
Xal0lex would you help us to understand how you found the topics/posts to clean up if they were not reported?

If you go to the root of the Russian section, you will see a list of topics at the bottom. So I saw two trash topics in this list. Naturally, I deleted them. And then I decided to go through the whole list and found a lot of such topics. Again, I deleted several topics. And then I realized that something was wrong and that it looked very suspicious, so I didn't touch those topics anymore.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
~ probably used the "Show the last topics started by this person" function.
Even easier: Search topics. You can quickly find the very short topic titles, nicely kept in Archival.
staff
Activity: 2408
Merit: 2021
I find your lack of faith in Bitcoin disturbing.
Xal0lex would you help us to understand how you found the topics/posts to clean up if they were not reported?

I'm going to dare to answer you and make a wild guess and I hope that I will not get dragged into this tsunami of shit, but Xal0lex probably used the "Show the last topics started by this person" function.
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 3016
You're falling into conspiracy theories. If you followed a modlog you'd seen that there was no massive deleting of posts in those topics by mods. There was only massive deletion of emptied topics with nonsense subjects. You can check it even without archives because actual log is still containing that data. I'm not a mod in here, but I'm sure that cleaning from nonsense is a mods job. I didn't report any on these topics because I didn't see them before they are being deleted, but if I've seen them, I'd reported them. I do report such nonsense in other cases.

Making an own small research before blaming someone in something could be good. Wink
Have you started your research from this topic from GazetaBitcoin? I will appreciate any input from anyone who have read that topic then read the 2nd topic from LoyceV.

Of course. I follow the situation and see lots of personal involvement of some users in all that. And I didn't want to be involved in those personal vendettas. But those vendettas are tending to grow unfortunately.

I don't know why did Ratimov delete posts in his topics and crashed some other topics and I hardly can support this way of dealing with forum, but a statement that he did it "to cover up his past and current evil activities" was not proved. All those topics are still available in different archives including ninjastic.space and loyce.club, so if there is anything compromising it should not be so hard to show that. But as for now I see only a statement about that based on an old discussion about plagiarism held several years ago which had no consequences then. And then basing on that statement which has no proofs moderators of Russian board are blamed in that they are sock-puppets because they are doing their job on cleaning the forum.

I already showed that at least one your statement is totally wrong, there was no situation when "Moderators delete the reported posts because now these posts are irrelevant in the discussion". You made an assumption and blamed someone, not trying to check if your suspicion is true.

I can say that I saw some cases when dozens of posts of some users were deleted and those users were not banned for incorrect behavior. If it is a personal case for you, it doesn't mean that it should be the same for others. If you'd asked why wasn't a user banned for that, it could be expected, but you preferred to blame moderators for doing a good job.

I see many assumptions in the topic and very few facts. If you want to convince me, I want to see provable facts. Exact links to the topics on ninjastic.space with explanation why are they compromising, with additional links on proofs etc, so everyone could check it and be sure that it is so. And showing that deleting those topics hides some important information to show why are you blaming moderators for their job.
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 2645
Farewell LEO: o_e_l_e_o
I haven't seen a single report from Ratimov for a long time, and even more so about his own topics. I will even clarify: I have not seen a single report on topics edited by Ratimov.
I haven't personally counted how many topics I've deleted. Maybe 10, maybe more. And plus at the moment there are a few more of Ratimov's garbage topics in the section, which will also be deleted in time. You can go to the section yourself and see how many of these topics there are at the moment. You can also go to modlog and do the math yourself.
Unfortunately he is in a difficult position now.

You're falling into conspiracy theories. If you followed a modlog you'd seen that there was no massive deleting of posts in those topics by mods. There was only massive deletion of emptied topics with nonsense subjects. You can check it even without archives because actual log is still containing that data. I'm not a mod in here, but I'm sure that cleaning from nonsense is a mods job. I didn't report any on these topics because I didn't see them before they are being deleted, but if I've seen them, I'd reported them. I do report such nonsense in other cases.

Making an own small research before blaming someone in something could be good. Wink
Have you started your research from this topic from GazetaBitcoin? I will appreciate any input from anyone who have read that topic then read the 2nd topic from LoyceV.
copper member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 899
🖤😏
I don't like what he did once with a thread I posted on, but I managed to deal with it, after all they are "moderators" all we can do is complaining, but now talking about PMs, merits, being in cahoots etc, is a bit childish because there are several archives available to access, so there is no hiding things.

What bothers me, did you guys discuss about plagiarizing before or not? So if it was already discussed, it makes no sense to delete old posts now, if he had nothing to hide, why trying to hide it now while he knows it can not be erased from archives?

"Anyways, I know it hurts when you get several of your posts deleted in a short amount of time, especially when you are in a campaign, I wish we could throw a couple of hundreds on the table to compensate for the lost posts, nobody would have bothered to complain then."


I'm speaking from psychological viewpoint in the quoted paragraph above, I'm not pointing fingers at anyone.😘
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 3016
At some point it was discovered that Ratimov was following a very simple strategy to cover up his past and current evil activities to achieve whatever goal he has. The steps are following [the order of the steps can be different in case by case but it is believed that the executions were very similar as explained in the following]
[a.] He moves his topics to Archive
[b.] He deletes his own posts
[c.] He moves the topic to the Russian local board. This is where Russian moderators come into our knowledge.
[d.] He reports other's posts from the topics.
[e.] Moderators delete the reported posts because now these posts are irrelevant in the discussion
[f.] He removes everything from the main topic and makes it an empty topic
[g.] He reports the empty topic to the moderator
[h.] Finally the moderator wipes out the entire topic.

A very lengthy but simple and effective strategy to wipe out any unwanted record. Anyone can delete their past posts which is not wrong but the way the whole things were done, it was not usual.  It definitely is questionable. So questions were asked, we had our speculations too.

This raise concern that why he preferred to move an English topic to a non-English board [his local of-course] and expected it to be deleted or already deleted.
Therefore, unless Xal0lex was his "pal" for deleting evidence from Archival board as well, it means that some other mod helped him.

You're falling into conspiracy theories. If you followed a modlog you'd seen that there was no massive deleting of posts in those topics by mods. There was only massive deletion of emptied topics with nonsense subjects. You can check it even without archives because actual log is still containing that data. I'm not a mod in here, but I'm sure that cleaning from nonsense is a mods job. I didn't report any on these topics because I didn't see them before they are being deleted, but if I've seen them, I'd reported them. I do report such nonsense in other cases.

Making an own small research before blaming someone in something could be good. Wink
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6205
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
Yeah but it's one thing when you post in a self moderated thread you know you risk having your post deleted maybe because the author simply doesn't like you or something.

Well, I tend to believe that after I've distrusted him he doesn't like me anymore...
However, I know I'm not the center of the world, so it's most probably more than that. He may be angry now on pretty much the whole forum. But maybe I'm wrong; it's only him who can tell, but, sadly, I am not convinced that he will give a honest answer (if any).
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1491
The first decentralized crypto betting platform
I would expect Ratimov to give some explanation as to why so many threads moved and deleted, as I said in another thread, but at this stage he doesn't seem to want to give any. Apart from the fact that I don't think he can give any that aren't outlandish on the subject.

While it's far from nice behavior on the forum, I knew the risk for this when I've posted in self-moderated topics.
It's a bit shame, since although he made a lot of good and informative topics, he acts highly questionable now and then.

Yeah but it's one thing when you post in a self moderated thread you know you risk having your post deleted maybe because the author simply doesn't like you or something. It's quite another for a highly reputable member of the forum who is at the top of several rankings on bpip.org to massively delete self moderated threads where significant issues have been addressed and merit has been given in them. That's not what the self-moderation function was intended for, I believe.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 556
PMs aren't encrypted.
Forum database includes PMs, deleted PMs, is encrypted and only admins, global moderators have access to database.
I think it two different things, PMs aren't encrypted, so when both of the sender and receiver(s) aren't delete the message, Theymos can easily check the message by visiting one of them.

But when both sender and receiver(s) deleted the message, they (Theymos, Gavin, Satoshi, and Sirius) can access the PMs through the database which need to decrypt it.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6205
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
Yes, I've also seen lately that quite a number of (older) posts got deleted. And all were in Ratimov's self moderated topics. Then I've seen that it's not only my posts that are removed, the whole topics got emptied.


While it's far from nice behavior on the forum, I knew the risk for this when I've posted in self-moderated topics.
It's a bit shame, since although he made a lot of good and informative topics, he acts highly questionable now and then.

But from there to questionable actions of mods... it still one more step, and a pretty big one.

I don't know to what extent the moderators of the local Russian board may be in cahoots with him

He is not a new member and it's normal that he has friends on the forum. If some of the mods are indeed "covering" him it's not a great thing to hear. It can be also normal mod tasks, as LoyceV said.
Can it be checked only from history (loyce.club, ninjastic.space), logs, bpip... if somebody has the time and willingness? While it can happen for mods to act incorrectly, even willingly, I am also not convinced that theymos should go into PMs (but I am not worried, I am 99% sure he will not), especially as this kind of things can be discussed easily outside of the forum.
full member
Activity: 420
Merit: 141
PMs aren't encrypted.
Forum database includes PMs, deleted PMs, is encrypted and only admins, global moderators have access to database.

Bitcointalk.org Privacy concern question
Deleted posts are almost never removed from the database. A PM is removed from the database if the sender and all recipients delete it.

Full database backups are created daily, and all global moderators and admins can download the (encrypted) backups and implement their own rotation policies.

they can download the backup to have it at multiple locations, but it's useless for them because they don't have the decryption key

This.

Only me, Gavin, Satoshi, and Sirius can decrypt it.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Ratimov's posts isn't that entirely bad, despite translating using tools, his posts are useful too.
Agreed. But I wasn't talking about those, I was talking about the posts that were edited into this:
Moving them into another board means he was spamming that board.

Forum admins can decrypt your message
PMs aren't encrypted.

Forum database includes PMs, deleted PMs, is encrypted and only admins, global moderators have access to database.
You're talking about backups. This is irrelevant.
full member
Activity: 420
Merit: 141
Quite a long post, but I took a little time to read the OP's post. It seems I don't have the capacity to express an opinion here. But I would like to have a little opinion.
You can keep reading. Reading only.

Quote
For advanced identification, it sounds good. But if the moderator has to see the PM and publish it to the forum then I think that's too deep and the PM is someone's secret. Everyone has secrets and I don't think it's ethical to share anything in PM with the public
PMs here are Personal Messages but they are not Private Messages. Forum admins can decrypt your message and if you don't trust them, don't send any PM.
Quote
Note: PM privacy is not guaranteed. Encrypt sensitive messages.

Discussion about it
PM privacy is not guaranteed. Encrypt sensitive messages.
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 340
Jolly? I think I've heard that name before. hmm
Quite a long post, but I took a little time to read the OP's post. It seems I don't have the capacity to express an opinion here. But I would like to have a little opinion.

For advanced identification, it sounds good. But if the moderator has to see the PM and publish it to the forum then I think that's too deep and the PM is someone's secret. Everyone has secrets and I don't think it's ethical to share anything in PM with the public
Pages:
Jump to: