Topic: IOTA - page 689. (Read 1473405 times)
EDIT : BTW I just noticed that I am the only one on the forum with over 1000 activity and not a legendary member
Legendary:the Legendary membergroup has no universal activity requirement.
You are guaranteed to become Legendary somewhere between 775 and 1030 activity,
but the exact point in this range at which you become Legendary is random per user.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/forum-rankspositionsbadges-what-do-those-shiny-coins-under-my-name-mean-178608
Check the genesis, please - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13628833
Verified ✓
Check the genesis, please - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13628833
I am there too. Sent 2 payments from the same address. Amount of IOTA fits the sum of these two. Thanks!
Check the genesis, please - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13628833
I don't see mine.
Want me to PM you my address?
Edit: Nevermind. I'm an idiot. It's there; I was looking for the wrong address.
Check the genesis, please - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13628833
next NXT?
Maybe, early-birds will make 10000* ROI profit Definitely not an investment. No way. It's a token, for users. Got it?
Got it.
nb
Where can i buy those coins and when will it be released ?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13619126 Holy Cow
Can we get this show on the road?
Can we get this show on the road?
Working on that now.
So to just generate a IOTA address even though I don't participate to the crowdsale, I should stop at step 3 here http://collect.iotatoken.com/ shouldn't I
Yes.
Holy Cow
Can we get this show on the road?
So to just generate a IOTA address even though I don't participate to the crowdsale, I should stop at step 3 here http://collect.iotatoken.com/ shouldn't I
Yes.
into what exactly?
C# is not longer considered as "a cheap M$- java knockoff".
So to just generate a IOTA address even though I don't participate to the crowdsale, I should stop at step 3 here http://collect.iotatoken.com/ shouldn't I
seriously?
many people (myself included) consider C# a cheap M$- java knockoff.
Not that I would badmouth such a thing, but it seems a bit redundant...
Getting a native c version looks much more effective.
Disclaimer: Personally, I only dabble in c occasionally, but seeing the raw power and compactness of jl777's SuperNET c codebase made me say that!
many people (myself included) consider C# a cheap M$- java knockoff.
Not that I would badmouth such a thing, but it seems a bit redundant...
Getting a native c version looks much more effective.
Disclaimer: Personally, I only dabble in c occasionally, but seeing the raw power and compactness of jl777's SuperNET c codebase made me say that!
The world has changed. http://www.mono-project.com/
into what exactly?
vanilla C is and will be unbeatable in terms of portability and extensibility compard to C#.
sure, adding additional layers (and therefore complexity) to run on nix for instance is
doable but this is not what i am talking about. a lean dependency free 33.3 kb C lib
which compiles from source on all major OS without bloat, ready to use is what i mean.
however, don't want to start a language war here but if your requirements are those
like portability, usability, extensibility etc. to unlock many other devs and projects
you have to go good-old-plain-ansi-C.
I'm hoping to convert it to C# because I want to convert it to C#. This is part hobby and part useful tool for the business Windows developer world. I understand that portability is important and I agree that writing a C API or client is of immense importance. However, a lot of business logic is written in .Net and a capable dev can right something that's very extensible and fast.
Anyway, that's my intent. I'm not looking to go into troll-mode (coz that's not my style:D) but that's not to say that a .Net option[\i] isn't without it's benefits.
absolutely agree rlh!
don't take me wrong here, it is great what you are doing but my suggestion points
to enable as much other devs as possible to overcome the lang gulag.
the requirements are different if IOTA see/confirms the potential in doing so.
seriously?
many people (myself included) consider C# a cheap M$- java knockoff.
Not that I would badmouth such a thing, but it seems a bit redundant...
Getting a native c version looks much more effective.
Disclaimer: Personally, I only dabble in c occasionally, but seeing the raw power and compactness of jl777's SuperNET c codebase made me say that!
many people (myself included) consider C# a cheap M$- java knockoff.
Not that I would badmouth such a thing, but it seems a bit redundant...
Getting a native c version looks much more effective.
Disclaimer: Personally, I only dabble in c occasionally, but seeing the raw power and compactness of jl777's SuperNET c codebase made me say that!
The world has changed. http://www.mono-project.com/
into what exactly?
vanilla C is and will be unbeatable in terms of portability and extensibility compard to C#.
sure, adding additional layers (and therefore complexity) to run on nix for instance is
doable but this is not what i am talking about. a lean dependency free 33.3 kb C lib
which compiles from source on all major OS without bloat, ready to use is what i mean.
however, don't want to start a language war here but if your requirements are those
like portability, usability, extensibility etc. to unlock many other devs and projects
you have to go good-old-plain-ansi-C.
I'm hoping to convert it to C# because I want to convert it to C#. This is part hobby and part useful tool for the business Windows developer world. I understand that portability is important and I agree that writing a C API or client is of immense importance. However, a lot of business logic is written in .Net and a capable dev can right something that's very extensible and fast.
Anyway, that's my intent. I'm not looking to go into troll-mode (coz that's not my style:D) but that's not to say that a .Net option isn't without it's benefits.
Jump to: