Science and religion are essentially one and the same thing and can be used interchangeably in any context.
Where do you people get such ideas?
Science is about finding the truth via evidence & experimentation, and correctly predicting future results (like cosmic background radiation)
Religion is about telling stories which are bullshit, have zero scientific merit, and are not capable of predicting anything
You're not looking at it from a fundamental perspective.
Both religion and science are systems of belief/faith. You believe in science, you believe in God.
Getting on a plane and while not fully understanding how it all works, requires what would qualify as 'faith'. Taking a pill when ill, requires faith in science because you have no idea how the chemicals work.
Both science and religion are systems of reason. Religion is not random, it follows a logic.
Both science and religion rely on assumptions.
No experiment/test in science can ever be truly conclusive. You can perform a test a million times and get the exact same result every time but there is absolutely no guarantee that on the million and one attempt, you'll get the expected result. Since there is no way to test something infinitely, science assumes a particular result to be true after a finite number of tests. That is why nothing in science is set in stone, theories that were once thought to be complete can still be improved upon as more tests are performed and new findings are uncovered.
we first describe what is science and what is religion. Science is basing on the fact and has its own experiment to prove something. conducting a scientific experiment is a good thing to prove something that has to be proven. while religion, some are true and science also proved that some of the saids in the bible was true but some is just cant proved. they just believe it by faith.
Same with science theory. Science theory is not known to be factual. If it were, it would be science law and not science theory.
Anyone who believes that science theory is factual has a science religion in that belief.
Science theories are validated by a direct observation. No belief is required.
When science theories are validated by direct observation, they become science laws. If they are not validated, they remain theories, because the observations shows that they are wrong, or because the observation is insufficient. Therefore, there are no science theories that are validated by direct observation... only science laws... because they were always science laws, and it is our weak observation that made us think that they were theories.
Theories like Big Bang and Black Hole are theories that will never be able to be validated by direct observation... BB because there never will be any certain observation of it, and BH because the observation is always tainted by its incompleteness or by other possible explanations for what is observed. Both should be relegated to the realm of non-theories.
Believing these theories and other theories like them to be true, when there is no way to tell if they are true, is religion.
