Well you can believe whatever you want but it doesn't make it real, there is 0 scientific evidence pointing towards the existence of Jesus or the God from the bible, in fact most of science disproves the Bible, the Flood, the magic stories, the age of the earth/universe, etc.
Actually, most of science proves the Bible. Believe whatever you want.
Would like to know what exactly. Certainly not the age of the universe or the earth, certainly not evolution, certainly not the fact that in no history book or any book at all except the bible exists any story about a worldwide flood, what exactly in science supports anything in the bible?
Rather than attempting to show you the proof, because you simply are ignorant about science enough that I would have to teach you from the basics, I will simply show you the big flaw in Big Bang. From there you can apply this basic flaw to the rest of science yourself.
The BB flaw has to do with the math of BB. Here it is. In the supposed beginnings of BB, we assume that math acted the same as, or very similar to, the way it acts now. But the point of all the differences in BB times, shows that the math would have to be different, as well.
What this means is, we can’t use our math on BB... or to extrapolate back to BB. To extrapolate back, we need to first figure out the changes in the way math worked back into the past... the BB of math, which would be the math of BB. The point is that we don’t know anything about BB, or even if there really was a BB, simply because we don't know how to extrapolate back to the math of BB so we can apply math correctly to see if it would have shown us BB or not.
You can apply this kind of thinking to all the science where there isn’t much or any hands-on observation, but basically only observation by extrapolation.
The above is shown by the Bible in the Creation:
1. God created the heavens and the earth. The creation is void, formless, and rather empty. In other words, most of our laws of physics didn’t necessarily apply to the universe at that time. The math of BB shows us this... no application of that math, because we can’t begin to understand what BB math might have been like, and therefore the whole idea of BB is science fiction, because we can't use our math in circumstances where the math was different.
2. God creates light. The stuff that was formless and void gained some order in the form of the electromagnetic spectrum. Does time have to do with the electromagnetic spectrum? Absolutely, even though time itself probably works beyond electromagnetics, as well. The point is, we can’t extrapolate backward in time until we know how time worked back then. And time certainly didn’t work the same as it does now, because both, the physics of the universe, and the electromagnetic spectrum were not set in place in the same way that they are now. Or do you have some proof that they were?
3. Next there is the creation of an expanse that separates water under the expanse, from water that is above the expanse. What is the expanse? Is it simply the sky of the atmosphere? Or is it the “sky” of the whole of outer space? Either way, the things that we don’t know about the past, keep all of our extrapolation from being necessarily anywhere near accurate. We can’t tell if there was a time without outer space or not. If we want to say that BB shows that there was such a time, we again don’t know because BB requires a different physics and a different math. Otherwise it wouldn’t be BB. Or do you have some proof that BB math and physics were the same as ours?
The point is laid out in the most basic of sciences that we have - cause & effect. In order to extrapolate backward to BB, or to extrapolate the age of the universe, we need to know all the causes of each effect in their entirety. If we are wrong in any of them, we extrapolate incorrectly.
C&E the basic. It pervades everything that we understand in every way that we understand. Next are entropy and complexity. These three together pervade everything. We don’t have a clue as to what a universe like ours would be like without one of them. Together they show that the universe is a machine of machines upon machines inside of machines and outside of machines.
Whatever started this whole thing going should be named. Some call it God. Others call it the Great Spirit. But the Bible explains it best.
Don’t let the parading of limited science draw you away from the rest of the story. The fact that science is so limited, is only science proving the Bible. The Bible shows how science is wrong (the above BB example), and becomes the correct science by doing this.
