Author

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 1494. (Read 5352420 times)

legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
Damn, this some very bad days… soon week. Wonder if slush.cz did change to ck pool software.. 
Congrats to the Winner by the way.
Aint it funny to see how the price of BTC is beeing manipulated at the moment by the Bears from China. They hold way too many btc. Each time the Bulls are trying to break through they get smashed by China bears.
Decentralized BTC my ass..
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
Hi guys i'm quite new to this. I have about 1.5Th/s on a SP20 throughout the day. I started mining on kano couple of days ago and so far so good. My question is, when a block has been found, it then goes through a confirmation process. if my miner is working on kano whilst the blocks are getting confirmed, is it earning money? i've been searching for days on the net and can seem to find an answer. thank you very much!
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
... and another zero fee payout confirmed Smiley
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Finally - another.
Someone shoot the damn messenger ... oh that's me Tongue
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
Juvia's crystal ball says... our next block is about within hour from now!

someone please wake me up from this nightmare.... common you blocks!!!
full member
Activity: 206
Merit: 100
Come on out block where are you.
sr. member
Activity: 546
Merit: 253
how many S7s can I run with 60amps/240v? assuming I use the Bitmain PSUs.

60 x 240 = 14400 watts derate by 80% so   11520 watts


that is   about  8 or 9 not 10

8 x 1400 = 11200 watts   >>>>  safe yes

9 x 1400 =  12600 watts >>>> maybe yes

10 x 1400 = 14000 watts >>>> safe no

Are you talking a single 60 amp breaker?
legendary
Activity: 4354
Merit: 9201
'The right to privacy matters'
how many S7s can I run with 60amps/240v? assuming I use the Bitmain PSUs.

60 x 240 = 14400 watts derate by 80% so   11520 watts


that is   about  8 or 9 not 10

8 x 1400 = 11200 watts   >>>>  safe yes

9 x 1400 =  12600 watts >>>> maybe yes

10 x 1400 = 14000 watts >>>> safe no
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Oh and I should have pointed out something relevant about the lowest CDF Smiley

To get the highest chance of getting the lowest CDF, you have to, at the latest, start mining when a block is found.

The simplest way to do this is to always be mining when a block is found.
i.e. always be mining, since no one knows when a block will be found Cheesy

Maybe the contest should just be a lowest cdf contest...
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
Juvia's crystal ball says... our next block is about within hour from now!
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Oh and I should have pointed out something relevant about the lowest CDF Smiley

To get the highest chance of getting the lowest CDF, you have to, at the latest, start mining when a block is found.

The simplest way to do this is to always be mining when a block is found.
i.e. always be mining, since no one knows when a block will be found Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1726
Merit: 1018
Thought so. So all the large rentals are effectively lowering the earnings due to the larger pool hash rate, while lowering the chance to hit a block.

No it doesn't work like that.  The shares that arrive at the pool are evaluated at that time.  Even though there will have been delay in getting them to the pool they won't be producing an artificial increase in pool hashrate because the pool will either accept or reject them at the moment they arrive at the pool.  What you are really looking at is increased chance for stales and probably wasted hashrate in the form of rejects.  If the miners pointed at NH were pointed directly at kano pool then the work updates and submissions would have less latency but as long as the share is still valid when it arrives at the pool through the more circuitous route through NH, it still has as much chance of producing a block as any other share.  I hit a block on the pool with a rental this past month.  The latency just means that more of those arriving shares will have become rejects (or potentially stales) due to that latency then would have otherwise been the case.  Really the loss here, if there is any, will be on the person who paid the rental.  I believe the shares will be deemed valid by NH and so part of the rental expense, and paid by NH to the actual miner, even though they may be deemed invalid by the kano pool due to latency.
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1003
What was the fee amount?

... zero ...

 Roll Eyes

Re Slush...I don't monitor it all the time any more, but when we were consistently hitting 4-5 blks a day, they hadn't hit but one block in several days. It may just be my ageing research methods prof brain, but that doesn't seem like a correlation.
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
This is a rare occurrence with two fat red blocks so close together.

I sort of compare slush's hits to Kano's and they've been tracking pretty well through this blockless time.  They also tracked the blocky weeks a little bit ago.  So I think the big miners are driving the statistics.  What are the chances two similar pools would perform similarly in time?
hero member
Activity: 735
Merit: 500
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
Now for the final May Avalon6 Giveaway competition details:

Details are 'relatively' the same as March and April ... and I'm adding another small incentive.

On each Sunday morning at 00:01 UTC in May (starting the 8th - lol which happens to be mother's day here) the leader at exactly that time, with the lowest CDF, will get my fee from the next 2 blocks found.

Adds up to a total of 4 new prizes totalling a bit over 1BTC for the month so it's not a lot, but anyway Smiley
... and it is actually 'possible' for one miner to win all four and one of the 2 final prizes.

March rules were here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14042677

very cool idea there kano good luck to everybody
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Now for the final May Avalon6 Giveaway competition details:

Details are 'relatively' the same as March and April ... and I'm adding another small incentive.

On each Sunday morning at 00:01 UTC in May (starting the 8th - lol which happens to be mother's day here) the leader at exactly that time, with the lowest CDF, will get my fee from the next 2 blocks found.

Adds up to a total of 4 new prizes totalling a bit over 1BTC for the month so it's not a lot, but anyway Smiley
... and it is actually 'possible' for one miner to win all four and one of the 2 final prizes.

March rules were here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14042677
full member
Activity: 206
Merit: 100
Congrats to the winners!
And thank you Kano and Avalon for such contest with fine prize and so geeky rules Smiley

PS
Now I wish pool hit some blocks soon so everybody could be the winners!
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
April 2016 Block CDF Competition list:

The 2 winning blocks are:

Block #851 ashg8000 with a CDF of 0.991 (471.929%) at 2016-04-29 17:15:08 UTC

Block #777 Abramov with a CDF of 0.019 (1.945%) at 2016-04-13 10:50:28 UTC

Now to determine the prizes, the first block found on the network in May (UTC) is:
409640 2016-05-01 00:12:11.001 0000000000000000051dd8cd63dcd32373ec53dab1bf7df05714cdefc5a50add
Which has an odd 'd' on the end.

So the prizes for April are:
Abramov wins the Avalon6
ashg8000 wins ~0.125 BTC from the next block we find

I'll contact Abramov (and Avalon) soon with details about getting the prize.

ashg8000 will get his BTC sent to his current payouts address in the next couple of days.
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Jump to: