Author

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 1837. (Read 5352527 times)

legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Payout 393047 sent
323b080c70fd9425dc68cbdaede6ca860e5a578227dbaff33a987aa71e847764
and confirmed
legendary
Activity: 2030
Merit: 1076
A humble Siberian miner
It's nice to observe an evolution of your pool. Keep it up!  Cool
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Now 3 remote servers Smiley

First remote node up and running, in Singapore

stratum+tcp://sg.kano.is:3333
stratum+tcp://sg.kano.is:80
stratum+tcp://sg.kano.is:81
stratum+tcp://sg.kano.is:443
stratum+tcp://sg.kano.is:8080

Code:
190TH/s  22.9 SPS  12 users  302 workers

Second remote node up and running, in Germany

stratum+tcp://de.kano.is:3333
stratum+tcp://de.kano.is:80
stratum+tcp://de.kano.is:81
stratum+tcp://de.kano.is:443
stratum+tcp://de.kano.is:8080

Code:
282TH/s  27.1 SPS  29 users  103 workers

Third remote node up and running, in Russia (Moscow)

New one up and running, I guess I should say it's a trial Smiley
stratum+tcp://ru.kano.is:3333
stratum+tcp://ru.kano.is:80
stratum+tcp://ru.kano.is:81
stratum+tcp://ru.kano.is:443
stratum+tcp://ru.kano.is:8080

--

When using any of these servers as your first mining server, I'd recommend you use the main server as your first backup.
If the remote servers go down due to 'unforeseen circumstances' the main server may still be fine

The reverse is actually also possible, but not as likely, that the remote server could be mining ok if the normal access to the main server is under attack, but the remote server connections are just out of the line of fire.

As mentioned earlier, all your shares to each server show up in the one place, on the main web site.
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Might of been the difficulty change

EDIT: That shift was only 11 seconds

5u74k akatsuki Jan-13 06:39:05 11s
Yep as the Help->Payouts page says Smiley

"A network difficulty change will also end the current shift and start a new shift."
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1006
Mine for a Bit

Might of been the difficulty change

EDIT: That shift was only 11 seconds

5u74k akatsuki Jan-13 06:39:05 11s


Block Difficulty:  113354299801

Welcome to a Whole new dimension!
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100

Might of been the difficulty change

EDIT: That shift was only 11 seconds

5u74k akatsuki Jan-13 06:39:05 11s
legendary
Activity: 1590
Merit: 1002
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Payout 393021 sent
211448f015079bdb70c2a8cfa5285db17809c170a2435f93f585324e9950c6d7
and confirmed

--

Ah I forgot to mention Smiley
We got an 'almost block' yesterday.

ckpool now only attempts to submit 99.9% 'unworthy' blocks (instead of the old 99%) so we should only average to see an 'unworthly' block about one in a thousand now.
But ckdb still reports shares that are 95% or above on the console.

One there in the middle (cloudminer) in the last 2 days - pretty close:
Code:
[2016-01-10 19:46:22.339+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 840.8% (873448062700/103880340815.5) Rdawg
[2016-01-11 01:35:55.997+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 1222.6% (1270092856949/103880340815.5) jbravo
[2016-01-11 12:33:06.912+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 760.4% (789925953704/103880340815.5) HolyScott
[2016-01-11 13:22:04.498+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 627.5% (651845870862/103880340815.5) GLORYTrading
[2016-01-11 21:04:40.399+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 110.9% (115201937984/103880340815.5) satfree3079
[2016-01-11 23:24:39.256+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 480.7% (499355637489/103880340815.5) 88miner
[2016-01-12 02:58:55.963+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 178.5% (185470171116/103880340815.5) bitminerpro
[2016-01-12 07:43:41.582+11] Share ok Diff 99.3% (103117425205/103880340815.5) cloudminer
[2016-01-12 11:36:11.682+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 118.6% (123245773097/103880340815.5) jbravo
[2016-01-12 17:25:06.757+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 1463.7% (1520495092748/103880340815.5) fubly
[2016-01-13 02:44:08.520+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 163.8% (170121647413/103880340815.5) bery89
[2016-01-13 06:52:10.716+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 165.5% (171922779430/103880340815.5) thedreamer
[2016-01-13 18:06:42.352+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 1217.0% (1379555754189/113354299801.5) Zemunac
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
hero member
Activity: 575
Merit: 500
Well the trend continues, anyone remember that kano got the 1st block of the last diff and now we get the 2nd block of the new diff? Very interesting coincidence, I said back then that getting the 1st block of the diff change was good luck, well i guess the 2nd will be good also. So instead of 500% luck we will have to settle for 250% luck over the next 12-13 days.
 Grin Grin Grin

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13290616
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1318
Technical Analyst/Trader
SweeeeeeeeeT   Grin

We start out the new difficulty change [113,354,299,801] with a block shortly after the change just like last time.
hero member
Activity: 1610
Merit: 538
I'm in BTC XTC
I take it difficulty just went up.  Sad  Checked the blocks page and the shares % went down a little from last I looked.  Not all the way down like we want, tho! Let's get a block popped at the new diff, mojo activate!

Edit-ah, now at a little over 113G, a mere dawdle!
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
The Gambler's Fallacy annoyance
oh and of course a 666.666% or worse block is expected, on average, once every 785.8 blocks
Exactly my point, we can expect red blocks.

I am so happy with this news - thanks to Bery's s3 - kopi on me when you come to Clementi area.
This proves that Kano can scale up. I hope the solo pool in SG will help hit the winner soon too.
Same here, I love when an S3 solves a block at these large difficulties, it gives me motivation to keep mine running on cksolo.

Personally, I think that any site that wont show a picture and forces you to enable javascript is bad news to me.
I run FF noscript, and any site that doesn't let me on ... I don't use.
Ditto, it's amazing how many things are hiding on web pages that most people who don't use noscript never even know about.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
I deleted that link post and any post that quoted it.

Personally, I think that any site that wont show a picture and forces you to enable javascript is bad news to me.
I run FF noscript, and any site that doesn't let me on ... I don't use.

Ahh, this makes sense.  I got an email saying my post was deleted and was like......................WHAT DID I DO WRONG?  I responded to that quote.

P.S We're ready for a BLOCK! 
vh
hero member
Activity: 699
Merit: 666
Ant pool just found 5 blocks in less than 15 minutes. I just found out bitcoin is broken. Great.


it will adjust itself on the next difficulty adjustment (in a few hours).   thus the cycle of of bitcoin life.
E
full member
Activity: 234
Merit: 100
Last post on this:

* = block for us
. = networkDiff/5 diffs submitted
` , ' = start and end of luck calculation window

At present:
Code:
*`.........*...*.*.....*...*'..             CDF 0.231
*`.........*...*.*.....*...*'........       CDF 0.231
*`.........*...*.*.....*...*'...........    CDF 0.231
*`.........*...*.*.....*...*'..........................................    CDF 0.231

My Suggestion (simplified for fixed network difficulty across window):
Code:
*..`.......*...*.*.....*...*..'             CDF 0.231
*........`.*...*.*.....*...*........'       CDF 0.231
*.........`*...*.*.....*...*...........'    CDF 0.305
*.........`*...*.*.....*...*..........................................'     CDF 0.972
E
full member
Activity: 234
Merit: 100
That table is there for that exact reason, to see how the pool is performing over time, not guess based on a single block.
Single block luck is so random that you'll be out of business pretty quickly if you base your decisions on that.
For sure, I agree that the the only luck/CDF numbers that really matter are if the long-term averages drop significantly below expectation value. Like, if the 50 block or above hit a CDF of 0.9999 we'd have to wonder if there was something wrong with the pool that was making us miss blocks.

 
So here's an example of the question I'm asking over a longer time frame: we have a pretty solid streak of 25 blocks in 8 days and are averaging 3.125/day. Then a drought hits. We clock another two days and no block has shown up. Is our luck over the last 25 blocks now as good? We've done 25 blocks in 10 days, or only 2.5/day.

Basically if the CDF doesn't update until we get a new block, we don't know how unlucky the current block is making the pool over time until it actually comes in, where as another way to view it is that the current block is decreasing our long term luck in a semi-continuous fashion.

I should just clarify that my intent is monitoring and understanding the pool + curiosity - this is coming from someone who has claimed organofcorti's bounty for typos in the neighborhood pool watch, and I don't read it to make pool hopping decisions!
E
full member
Activity: 234
Merit: 100
Yeah I'm betting on that not happening ... ... ... I see the pool differently to you.

Peace offering sent via PM -- I hopethink this is a misunderstanding?

E
Jump to: