KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 2241.

bgibso01

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1001

Quote from: -ck on November 01, 2014, 10:54:22 PM

Quote from: bgibso01 on November 01, 2014, 11:24:25 AM

Is the worker count correct for the mining to address link? Mine is currently showing 6 workers, but I really only have 5. Maybe someone is being kind, except the hashrate looks correct.

The worker count is correct. If you issued a "restart" on cgminer et. al then the socket may still be around from the old instance. It's something I'm fixing now on cgminer now that I'm aware it happens.

Ok, that's exactly it. I'm using some S-4 units that I have to apply your fix to.

DanielRo

hero member

Activity: 694

Merit: 501

Quote from: -ck on November 01, 2014, 10:54:56 PM

Quote from: DanielRo on November 01, 2014, 01:36:44 PM

Question. How to withdrawal the funds?
I've registred an user, mined for about two days. A block was found. Now it is matured.
I've entered one of my BTC adresses in Account Settings, but no withdrawal button. I may guess it is done manually at this stage of pool development. May I need to send a PM with my username?

It's all manual at the moment and all payments go out together with the entire block funds. Next payment should be processed later today.

Thanks.

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4326

Merit: 8950

'The right to privacy matters'

Quote from: -ck on November 01, 2014, 10:54:56 PM

Quote from: DanielRo on November 01, 2014, 01:36:44 PM

Question. How to withdrawal the funds?
I've registred an user, mined for about two days. A block was found. Now it is matured.
I've entered one of my BTC adresses in Account Settings, but no withdrawal button. I may guess it is done manually at this stage of pool development. May I need to send a PM with my username?

It's all manual at the moment and all payments go out together with the entire block funds. Next payment should be processed later today.

thanks for info. I see block has been fully confirmed so I guess payments come soon.

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: DanielRo on November 01, 2014, 01:36:44 PM

Question. How to withdrawal the funds?
I've registred an user, mined for about two days. A block was found. Now it is matured.
I've entered one of my BTC adresses in Account Settings, but no withdrawal button. I may guess it is done manually at this stage of pool development. May I need to send a PM with my username?

It's all manual at the moment and all payments go out together with the entire block funds. Next payment should be processed later today.

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: bgibso01 on November 01, 2014, 11:24:25 AM

Is the worker count correct for the mining to address link? Mine is currently showing 6 workers, but I really only have 5. Maybe someone is being kind, except the hashrate looks correct.

The worker count is correct. If you issued a "restart" on cgminer et. al then the socket may still be around from the old instance. It's something I'm fixing now on cgminer now that I'm aware it happens.

DanielRo

hero member

Activity: 694

Merit: 501

Question. How to withdrawal the funds?
I've registred an user, mined for about two days. A block was found. Now it is matured.
I've entered one of my BTC adresses in Account Settings, but no withdrawal button. I may guess it is done manually at this stage of pool development. May I need to send a PM with my username?

TheMinex

newbie

Activity: 54

Merit: 0

Would be nice to have - min payout setting ( obviously must be higher than pool min payout Grin

), near dust transactions are disliked by small mines too Tongue

Mined with address for little time, then registered and I continued to use that address. Don't know if addiction of the founds is automated, keep an eye at the next block!

Cheers, great work Wink

bgibso01

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1001

Is the worker count correct for the mining to address link? Mine is currently showing 6 workers, but I really only have 5. Maybe someone is being kind, except the hashrate looks correct.

loshia

legendary

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1000

Quote from: -ck on November 01, 2014, 02:04:13 AM

And a mini bounce for further scalability improvements.

Just so people know what the improvements are, if you check what's gone into the latest ckpool code you'll see changes that correspond with the pool upgrades (doesn't get more open than that does it?).

The ckpool code was not remotely limiting, but being able to see the pool working live and profiling where the CPU is used makes for excellent instant development of whatever is currently the biggest CPU user. The main connection event handler was converted from poll to epoll reducing CPU usage of that to 1/10th and the share processing workqueue was broken up into many threads (proportional to the number of CPUs on the machine) to better distribute out share processing. We're now prepared for about 10x as many workers as we were yesterday, so keep em coming...

Nice work as always
Could you be so kind you or kano to share total mem usage of the pool at the momet?
thank you

DanielRo

hero member

Activity: 694

Merit: 501

Quote from: QuiveringGibbage on October 31, 2014, 06:28:57 PM

https://blockchain.info/tx/7b47a5415f69a092f5d2c252ff6bc60f34c333e52ef04cdc24adf485f9db270d

Code:

[10:25:54]  blockchain only showing 1 block so that's a good sign :)
[10:26:03]  yoouu pew pew pew!!!

QG

Nice. 107.41%. May the next be more quickly.

norgan

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Decentralize your hashing - p2pool - Norgz Pool

Quote from: -ck on November 01, 2014, 03:05:24 AM

Quote from: norgan on November 01, 2014, 02:46:10 AM

Nice work, I noticed the diff reset and hash go to 0 but came up pretty quick. Working well now. A question, if I am in Australia and I have several miners, would I be better to send them to a local ckpool proxy then send that to ck pool in regards to latency and reduced reject/stales?

If your internet bandwidth is often maxed out, especially upstream (such as ADSL which most Australians have) then there is a potential advantage to combining them with a local proxy. On the other hand if you're not maxing it out, you're better off leaving them all connected separately as every extra step in the chain adds its own form of latency. The server is on the west coast of USA though so it's about as close as you can get to Australia and still be in the states.

Got them on good fibre so all good. Thanks for clearing that up.

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: norgan on November 01, 2014, 02:46:10 AM

Nice work, I noticed the diff reset and hash go to 0 but came up pretty quick. Working well now. A question, if I am in Australia and I have several miners, would I be better to send them to a local ckpool proxy then send that to ck pool in regards to latency and reduced reject/stales?

If your internet bandwidth is often maxed out, especially upstream (such as ADSL which most Australians have) then there is a potential advantage to combining them with a local proxy. On the other hand if you're not maxing it out, you're better off leaving them all connected separately as every extra step in the chain adds its own form of latency. The server is on the west coast of USA though so it's about as close as you can get to Australia and still be in the states.

norgan

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Decentralize your hashing - p2pool - Norgz Pool

Quote from: -ck on November 01, 2014, 02:04:13 AM

And a mini bounce for further scalability improvements.

Just so people know what the improvements are, if you check what's gone into the latest ckpool code you'll see changes that correspond with the pool upgrades (doesn't get more open than that does it?).

The ckpool code was not remotely limiting, but being able to see the pool working live and profiling where the CPU is used makes for excellent instant development of whatever is currently the biggest CPU user. The main connection event handler was converted from poll to epoll reducing CPU usage of that to 1/10th and the share processing workqueue was broken up into many threads (proportional to the number of CPUs on the machine) to better distribute out share processing. We're now prepared for about 10x as many workers as we were yesterday, so keep em coming...

Nice work, I noticed the diff reset and hash go to 0 but came up pretty quick. Working well now. A question, if I am in Australia and I have several miners, would I be better to send them to a local ckpool proxy then send that to ck pool in regards to latency and reduced reject/stales?

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

And a mini bounce for further scalability improvements.

Just so people know what the improvements are, if you check what's gone into the latest ckpool code you'll see changes that correspond with the pool upgrades (doesn't get more open than that does it?).

The ckpool code was not remotely limiting, but being able to see the pool working live and profiling where the CPU is used makes for excellent instant development of whatever is currently the biggest CPU user. The main connection event handler was converted from poll to epoll reducing CPU usage of that to 1/10th and the share processing workqueue was broken up into many threads (proportional to the number of CPUs on the machine) to better distribute out share processing. We're now prepared for about 10x as many workers as we were yesterday, so keep em coming...

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4326

Merit: 8950

'The right to privacy matters'

Quote from: -ck on October 31, 2014, 08:32:31 PM

Sorry, full restart took a little longer than planned. Up properly now.

seems to be working well.

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Sorry, full restart took a little longer than planned. Up properly now.

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4326

Merit: 8950

'The right to privacy matters'

So I have been mining an s-3 for about 40 of the 80 hours it took to make the block.

So we wait for payouts about 10 hours?

Cheeseater

sr. member

Activity: 351

Merit: 250

Quote from: -ck on October 31, 2014, 08:08:48 PM

There'll be a little blip in mining as we upgrade the ckpool code. You may see a small burst of rejects and a redirect notice but you probably won't failover during the upgrade due to the way ckpool handles changeover, but if you do it won't last long.

I'm noticing it Shocked

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

There'll be a little blip in mining as we upgrade the ckpool code. You may see a small burst of rejects and a redirect notice but you probably won't failover during the upgrade due to the way ckpool handles changeover, but if you do it won't last long.

mdude77

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1001

That's ridiculous.

M

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 2241. (Read 5352229 times)