Topic: KYC at end of bounty campaign - page 3. (Read 3299 times)
Yes, now many have started to do so,on the one hand immediately part of the bounty will fall off,and on the other before the state on the one hand are transparent,all investors and bounty drivers in the palm of your Hand,and even more so with the policy of the State that all under the tax,and for all the money to collect,And for bounty players of course not ice, mostly when more than$ 100 there are KYC
I also think that KYC should be reported at the beginning of the company. There are people who do not want to give their data. But they participate in the bounty and then can not receive rewards.
Actually some manager who uses KYC during there project are suppose to talk about at the beginning of the project but they all use to give update about the campiagn if there will be a KYC it will be at the end of the campign to know those that are using multiple account. the meaning of KYC simply means know your customer it is the way to know if you are real or fake.
KYC is for transperancy. That is not a problem. But the problem is not letting people know from the beginning whether KYC is required or not. Most Campaign try to do it at the end of the bounty. And a lot of participants miss that.
"KYC is not the problem. Not letting people know from the beginning is the problem."
Totally agree with you. If payments for social networks will be small, then who wants to show their documents for $ 20-15? And of course you need to say this in the end and not in the first post, but in a normal font without excretions)))"KYC is not the problem. Not letting people know from the beginning is the problem."
This seems to be quite unfair as this should be upfront so one can decide to participate or not. Backdooring and holding bounty hostage at the end for KYC is surely a sleight of hand.
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
some of the bounties clearly stated the rules and requirements before the bounty starts but sometimes it is also stated that they can change it if it is for the good of the project. But for me askig for KYC from participants should be asked and clearly stated before the bounty starts to know if bounty huner is really willing to join and comply with that rules to be fairbfor both parties.
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
Is this fair?
some of the bounties clearly stated the rules and requirements before the bounty starts but sometimes it is also stated that they can change it if it is for the good of the project. But for me askig for KYC from participants should be asked and clearly stated before the bounty starts to know if bounty huner is really willing to join and comply with that rules to be fairbfor both parties.
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
I think that pass KYC is only if the project is proven and promising. Also, the amount of remuneration plays a role. It's a waste of time for $ 5-10.
KYC is for transperancy. That is not a problem. But the problem is not letting people know from the beginning whether KYC is required or not. Most Campaign try to do it at the end of the bounty. And a lot of participants miss that.
"KYC is not the problem. Not letting people know from the beginning is the problem."
"KYC is not the problem. Not letting people know from the beginning is the problem."
This is very unfair. But there are no other options if you want to get the reward, you have to do it.
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
I dont like it and to be honest this kind of last minute requirement means the project is getting free marketing and the worst part is some projects wont even redistribute the extra coins nor compensate users that have not passed KYC.Is this fair?
And what I don't understand is why should KYC be applied to bounty hunters who cannot be classified as their customers
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
I like the idea and KYC requirements should be the bounty teams responsibility to get the necessary information if it is required or not, right before bounty is open! What do you think?
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
I think some of campaign manager allow it for those who cheat at least if there are kyc process after bounty or in order to get the reward they cant cheat anymore through that way. Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
I agree to all 100%! I'm not against verification of the person, but announce it at the beginning of the company, so that everyone is warned about this. News about the passage of KYC can simply be missed - and EVERYTHING! You will not get anything!
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
Well if they mention it on the start, they should better keep it in the end. but,Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
I really dont get it. Last time i check Cryptocurrency also protects users privacy and anonimosity. so doing KYC is a bit contradicts that. And International ID's is kinda hard to get specially on countries who doesnt have one. and the obligation and hassle. but besides, in the end. if its the bounty manager ask for. bounty hunters cant do about it.
and KYC is "Know your Customers", and Bounty hunters are not their customers. unless a hunter buys their token.
They should announce there will be KYC at the start... some people don't feel comfortable sharing their identity
Shouldn't need to do KYC as bounty hunters aren't customers, the clue is in the name lol.
KYC is good way to decide that customer/Bounty Hunter is robot or human. I think Admin should tell first when bounty start that KYC is need or not. Because Everyone don't agree to doing KYC
It is much better if the possibility of doing a KYC will occur on the Bounty Thread so that we are aware of it before we decide to join the said campaign, this is just fair to all especially bounty hunters. On the other hand KYC can help to minimize bounty cheaters and abusers too. The KYC in the campaign bounty is a guarantee that there will be no participants with multi-accounts, so there will be less participants and more rewards for everyone. I suggest that it will be announced beforehand, to be fair to everybody.
It's important to complete kyc after bounty.A company should know about their customer,So kyc is important.But when a bounty end most of bounty hunters didn't check the thread,so most of bounty participators miss kyc and didn't get reward. So I think kyc important but on time.
It is very difficult for the bounty hunters to pass KYC especially this involves their full information and also, it is like giving your information to someone you dont totally know which can be used in bad things. Not all ICO's are secure, some are just a piece of SCAM. It is like risking your information just to earn, well it is a very risky move but it is still up to the user.
It is fair since some multi accounts that joined a single bounty campaign can't bypass since it needs a 1:1 ratio of bounty participant to a valid ID. I'm just annoyed when the KYC form is not well announced (sometimes late announcement) and sometimes you can't receive the reward just because of failed KYC. But overall KYC on bounty is fair and it is combined with stake distribution system for the fairest bounty campaign that you will join.
Jump to: