I do not really like this idea but if it will move forward the transfer of coins to those who are needed to be paid then I shall.
I still want to be anonymous with this kind of field but you are force to do so by giving them your information. Some countries will just do that. Better to pick the ICO that have no country restriction. Look at where their company is based.
Topic: KYC at end of bounty campaign - page 6. (Read 3299 times)
Actually some manager who uses KYC during there project are suppose to talk about at the beginning of the project but they all use to give update about the campiagn if there will be a KYC it will be at the end of the campign to know those that are using multiple account. the meaning of KYC simply means know your customer it is the way to know if you are real or fake.
sometimes I don't blame the bounty managers. The project developers do not give them info as early as possible and so they have to give the news immediately they're told
I am against this kind of System and if it is needed for the bounty to get paid I'd rather not participate with them. I really think the anonymity or the privacy of every person will be deprived.
With KYC I think will be difficult to get the payment. And with our KYC still passes through several stages to pass examination charging KYC. And if we do not qualify for sure our struggle during work on the project would be very wasteful and only makes us annoyed.
KYC - it is important requirement and obligatory for the most regulated ICO.
I think that in the near future all the bounties of normal ICO projects will require identification of the identity - and this will be common process.
The necessity of this procedure for bounty hunters is not obvious. The main complaint to this procedure is that its need usually becomes a surprise. For various reasons, not everyone wants to go through it. I think that in the near future all the bounties of normal ICO projects will require identification of the identity - and this will be common process.
It all depends on the purpose for which KYC will be used. 
First of all, this should be used to exclude bots. But this can also be used to reduce bounty costs.
Therefore, the tool itself is not bad, but the result depends on who will use it...
First of all, this should be used to exclude bots. But this can also be used to reduce bounty costs.
Therefore, the tool itself is not bad, but the result depends on who will use it...
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
KYC or not, to me it doesn't really make any difference. The major difference is the timing of the announcement or incorporation into the Bounty Campaign. It's very wrong and tantamount to breach of agreement should it be announced at the end of the campaign. Doesn't show fairness. Every bounty managers should announce this before the Bounty is started to make everyone aware Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
I am also most disliked the system. But if there's already a notice beginning could certainly think about want to follow it or not. But if notice of the end will be very difficult to accept it. If not given unpaid of course we KYC. However, if the given identity then we may be misused.
Well, this is complete nonsense, especially when for some reason you can not go through this KYC and in the end, you just wasted your time for this campaign, and of course, no one warned you
It happens to me recently. The bounty manager didn't mention it earlier
They are cheating !! if they mention it earlier i think many hunter will not join their campaign because this KYC rules
They are cheating !! if they mention it earlier i think many hunter will not join their campaign because this KYC rules
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
Yes, I agree that if a campaign will have KYC, then it should be announced at the start. There are plenty of people who are rightly wary of submitting KYC documentation, and if a company doesn't mention it until right at the end, then it could be interpreted as manipulating the bounty hunter into working for free.
KYC is becoming more and more important, and any good campaign will mention it at the start. The excpetion I suppose is when a company might only become aware that KYC is necessary partway through the project - in which case they should announce it as soon as they can.
I think the bounty that asks for KYC at the end of the campaign is a very suspicious bounty because dev is trying not to pay the participants who join so they complicate the participants and this is the thing I hate the most
Recently few of Bounties are asking for kyc, it is to avoid multiple accounts in one bounty. But they have to mention at the starting of bounty is good.
It is normal when at the end of the company the multi accounts are lost, in this case an award will be more for those who performs
tasks honestly. It is necessary to enter to thread every week and check if кyc not to lose an award for work.
tasks honestly. It is necessary to enter to thread every week and check if кyc not to lose an award for work.
KYC - it is important requirement and obligatory for the most regulated ICO.
I think that in the near future all the bounties of normal ICO projects will require identification of the identity - and this will be common process.
I think that in the near future all the bounties of normal ICO projects will require identification of the identity - and this will be common process.
Almost all serious projects require documents, and soon it will be mandatory for all projects. the only annoying thing that this procedure is done in the end, in my opinion the rules should be set at the beginning.
There is a good effect also having a kyc in fairness because they want to determine if you have a multiple accounts, a lot of members here has a multiple accounts so to be fair with other members they implement this kyc.
What's fair in that?
Many people dislike KYC and they'd never get involved if they knew that they'd be required to go through it.
It would be very good if such bounty managers and projects could be blacklisted somehow.
I think it's a scheme for them to pay less bounty tokens then it was planned.
KYC is fair for me, at least it will lessen the abuser who tries to cheat the bounty program. but will be better if they announce the KYC at the beginning. because i see most of KYC which should use a passport and I'm sure no all people have a passport.
Well, i dont like to share always my personal stuff but at least it has one good thing. Scammer and multiple accounts will be busted
I wonder what happens to those from countries not allowed in the KYC that participated in the bounty that will be denied their reward. Managers of campaign should verify on this before posting any campaign, so any involved will know at the initial stage. It will be well understood if the participant neglect the instruction and proceeded to participating.
I also wonder how, in such a situation, to be bounty hunters who live in countries not permissible for KYC. I think that's why it's worth to warn people in advance about the passage of KYC so that the person himself can decide whether he wants to do it or not.Jump to: