Topic: KYC at end of bounty campaign - page 5. (Read 3299 times)
It is much better if the possibility of doing a kyc will occur on the Bounty Thread so that we are aware of it before we decide to join the said campaign.
Lately almost all of the major companies began to demand for the bounty participants the passage of KYC. ICOs want to work legally in different markets throughout the world, including where cryptocurrencies have been regulated legally. However sometimes KYC is mandatory and for garbage companies.
I don't like it and think that it's very unfair. Everyone understands that if this rule was mentioned at the start, then there would be much less participants and this project wouldn't be as popular. I think it shows that they don't respect their supporters, so i guess really solid and serious projects will not do so.
I think that soon KYC will be in all projects and even in airdrops. But I do not like this idea. I do not like to send my personal data to projects.
For those of us who do Bounty, KYC's going to be in trouble, they're just odd coins, but they're asking us KYC to be unreasonable. I do not like KYC because they are so confusing to me. I think passwords are easy to pass on to others, so what does KYC mean after I sell tokens to someone else? 
Its unacceptable when the announce it at the end of the bounty campaign but kcy has one big advantage -> to kick all those scammers
It is annoying that more and more bounty campaigns require participants to submit KYC.
If it was only noticed at the end of the campaign, it is unacceptable.
If it was only noticed at the end of the campaign, it is unacceptable.
for now many bounty who use Kyc at the end of this campaign a little inconvenient for the bounty because they have to fill the existing Kyc form, maybe because now many are making cheats on bounty so they make Kyc for verification of original data.
Uncertainty is the main cause of all incidents. Of course, participation rules, including the KYC requirement, must be specified before starting work. I do not mind to follow all the instructions, even more, I believe that soon КYC will be an integral part of participating in the bounty.
But what is the benefit KYC gives us? I do not really see any benefit from KYC to the ICO project. Because when holding tokens he can transfer tokens to anyone. And those who accept tokens through other people do not need KYC, everyone will not know who he is, so it's a waste of time for KYC.The benefits of KYC are not for us but for those projects because they are applicable to law and we all know that there are some countries that prohibit their community from following ICO projects, then KYC program to know who invests in the ICO project, bounty obviously no benefit at all.
Uncertainty is the main cause of all incidents. Of course, participation rules, including the KYC requirement, must be specified before starting work. I do not mind to follow all the instructions, even more, I believe that soon КYC will be an integral part of participating in the bounty.
But what is the benefit KYC gives us? I do not really see any benefit from KYC to the ICO project. Because when holding tokens he can transfer tokens to anyone. And those who accept tokens through other people do not need KYC, everyone will not know who he is, so it's a waste of time for KYC.
It doesn't sound well at all because we suppose to know at the beginning of the bounty that there will be KYC. I think they are doing it so as to separate the bots and to reduce the amount shared among the participants.
Its kinda frustrating kyc is to other bounty hunters for some dont want to go through this process neither do i as much as possible i dont want to spread my personal data by doing this but also i want to get my bounty tokens so im obligue to do so.. But i guess they should not require this for bounty hunters anymore..
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
I consider this ico scam, they know that majority of bounty hunters do not like this KYC thing and they are getting free works from bounty hunters when they implement this in the last days of the campaign, we should give them a negative trust rating because this is scamming people.
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
I totally agree that bounties campaigns that require kyc should clearly state that there will be mandatory kyc to get the rewards. But on the other hand I don't see it necessary as a bad thing because there is a lot of abuse going on in bounty campaigns and therefore the programs can hedge a bit with the kyc procedure and make sure that one person only receives one reward and not rewards for multiple signups. As crypto and icos (and boy th campaigns with them) are still in their infancy, there is still a lot of change going to happen. Now it's kyc, tomorrow it will be another thing. Guess we just have to adapt to new circumstances to keep up with the pace of this fast developing space.
I think that soon KYC will be in all projects and even in airdrops. But I do not like this idea. I do not like to send my personal data to projects.
Well I don't know what is difficult to pass kyc ? a routine check of documents no more than
the most infuriating thing is a lot of information need KYC at the end of the bounty. with a lot of forced entry and finally give their identity, however, it is also at risk. but after having such participants are also always ask before following the bounty if necessary and whether KYC. doing so will certainly be able to provide clear information about the condition.
If you did not noticed , you agreed that the manager of the bounty have the right to change any rules without explain or even without any reason . But let me tell you that sometimes doing KYC is not in there plan until they kinda forced to do it , I do not thing any manager will force KYC unless he/she got forced to apply it . I do not like to do KYC and I avoid campaign require it , unless it is strong project I do not really mind doing it .
But if it forced on me whether the project is strong or not I will just do it ( Better than lose my work effort for few months ) .
But if it forced on me whether the project is strong or not I will just do it ( Better than lose my work effort for few months ) .
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
In my own opinion, kyc at the end of bounty campaigns are just fine as long as they will introduce that policy but if they are going to kyc without announcing it at the very first start then it was probably a scam.
KYC, of course, But to be fair enough to those people who are not willing to disclose their private information, despite of not displaying it publicly, the ICO campaign must announce it before anything else.
This is frowned upon because some bounty hunters do not have the necessary documents yet to confirm their identity so their time and effort is wasted for how many months they were promoting the campaign. Some also have the documents but choose not to do the KYC because they are afraid that their information will be use illegally that might endanger them. This should be announce upon the commencement of the campaign so that bounty hunters can choose whether they would like to participate or not. The project also lose its reputation when they do this kind of scheme and it's not good for the participant.
Jump to: