Topic: KYC of bounty hunters - page 29. (Read 6981 times)
You're right. It's very annoying that I have to provide my personal records to some project managers for getting rewards for the award, since I can easily end up giving my personal information, such as Passport info and NID, to scammers. Nowadays there are so many ICOs, and many scammers took it as a chance to escape with millions of dollars, while if they ask the bounty hunter to continue KYC, the hunters can also get into trouble.
In fact, this is a way of screening out bots, which many programmers earn a lot of money on. So we can not do without KYC 
This is certainly a big stupidity, given that the figures involved are ridiculous. In any case, I do not send my data to an unknown entity for a few pennies. 
Recently, the law on the protection of personal data began to work in Europe. General Data Protection Regulation GDPR https://gdpr-info.eu/.
It seems to me that the requirements of the companies to pass the KYC to the members of the bounty violate this law
It seems to me that the requirements of the companies to pass the KYC to the members of the bounty violate this law
This is their right to require confirmation of identity, the truth remains a question for what they require it.
At present, the requirements and standards aimed at implementing this principle are set at the level of national legislation, I think this is right and necessary in this field.
I treat this phenomenon negatively! Where then is the main advantage of krupto? anonymity! And if the scam project just collects data for fraudulent or criminal purposes? I try to ask the managers if there will be a KYC, and if so, I just do not participate in it
This is certainly a good let alone actually to avoid fraud and account double running rampant. with the system of Division of the bounty may be KYC even more secure.
Which bounty programs are doing that? Bounty hunters would just have to boycott their campaigns and I tell you that they would stop with this intrusion in people's privacy, or run a campaign that nobody would join.
Bounty hunters should not be asked for KYC, because they do not invest their money, so why they need this info?
Documents can be easily sold on black market
Documents can be easily sold on black market
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I don't think its a bad idea but what I dislike is that most of the bounties don't include the need for bounty hunters to pass KYC when writing the bounty thread. So, a lot of bounty hunters would have work for some weeks and the bounty manager will come around to update the bounty thread that all bounty hunters must pass KYC. That's not fair at all.
I think the main reason is that companies want to know that you dont have multiaccount.
For me, there remains a big mystery - Why do some projects require the passage of KYC for bounty participants only after the project finishes selling tokens? Why not offer to go through this procedure before starting to participate in the bounty? I think it would be much more fair.
Bounty hunters usually get a few coins and they do not invest anything. I do not understand why they need to pass the KYC.
In principle, I do not see anything wrong with it, if this is warned immediately. However, if this is only revealed at the end, it may not be fair to some participants who are not ready for this
I totally understand their erring on the side of caution; however, I might have an impact on the quality of submissions by bounty hunters when you mainly have non native English speaker promoting project targeted at English speakers.
It seems to me that the question is not only who is a member of the Bounty of the company. In any case, the question remains open, as the personal data of all the participants that have been registered with KYC will be used.
Unfortunately I think it is becoming a standard slowly. And latest Amazix move is also showing that. Hope I'm wrong.
the main advantage of cryptocurrency is anonymity. when I send or receive my coins I want to be sure that it's anonymous. I am opposed when ICO organizers are required from participants to provide document confirming the identity. this is a violation of the main rule of cryptocurrency. but unfortunately there's nothing we can do about it.
The first and the biggest advantage of crypto is anonymity. And it's really indecent policy to ask ID and other private information, especcialy from bounty hunters.
I agree with you, who knows where your personal information may be, and for what purpose it will be used. There have been cases when KYC has passed, and then the SCAM project has turned out and who knows how now they use information from generosity
Pity news for Bounty Participants who participate in Amazix Bounties:
Social media (twitter/facebook) will no longer exist in future + Every participant MUST pass KYC requirements
Social media (twitter/facebook) will no longer exist in future + Every participant MUST pass KYC requirements
Jump to: