I totally disagree with this, but what can we really do to this? Investors spend money just to get the token of the ICO and we are doing our work without any money involve, so we cant do anything but to follow they want but what i see in the future will be a long wait to have the payment allotted for the bounties, and if the ICO don't allow US citizen to join the ICO then they cant do BOUNTY too as they need to do KYC.
i did KYC, with loyalcoin and caviar social media bounties.
Topic: KYC of bounty hunters - page 31. (Read 6981 times)
I do not support the use of KYC at the end of the bounty campaign in order to claim your rewards. Any project that does not specify that there will be KYC at the end of the campaign before you can claim your rewards is especially shady. If they want to do KYC then they should specify it at the beginning of the campaign so that whoever ends up signing up knows what they are getting into
I'm probably like many people here expressing my protest concerning the KYC process for investors, because it seems to me that these are not legitimate actions in relation to bounty hunters
I think it's just a necessity. I don't think the team needs it either, because it's too much work for them to check all the data. These are the conditions that require the team of lawyers and exchanges in order for the team to have no problems and so that they can continue to equate their token
You say that carrying out a KYC check is a necessity, without even specifying whether the ICO teams have the right to conduct such a check against members of the generosity campaign? I am absolutely sure that they have no such rights, because such a test is applied to investors. We are not investors of their ICO projects and therefore can not pass such an audit. Moreover, in this forum we provide services for advertising ICO projects anonymously. You propose not only to disclose our anonymity, but also to transfer to people who themselves are fraudsters in not less than a third of all cases, all our personal data with copies of our passports. It's very stupid and frivolous.
I understand for submitting KYC for ICO, but for bounty... May be they just want info for other use..
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
This is not fair. I think not every bounty participants would do that. Personal info is very important. It's very dangerous if a stranger can know your personal details. Bounty participants is not an investor, so there is no reasons ICO team asking for KYC.
I cannot get my stakes if I wont submit or do KYC, I was disappointed as I dont like the idea of handing my information, call me paranoid but I don't trust anyone in internet specially my Identification Card.
Why bounty hunters must pass KYC procedure? I understand that ICO organizers can ask investors about the origin of money for investment. But bounty hunters get their reward for their work.
If you don't like to do KYC for bounty, you can just ignore the bounty campaigns that require it.
As far as I know, most of the bounty campaigns don't need KYC.
As far as I know, most of the bounty campaigns don't need KYC.
Avoid, new precedent trying to be set, the more people the give in, then you'll have to give you info out for every single airdropped/bounty out there.
It's very dangerous for you to trust these non-reputable individuals with your information and for the future of cryptos as a whole, yet no one is discussing this.
You can blame Polymath for this, they don't want to work harder filter to filter puppets, so instead they want your ID.
Edit: There is probably nothing we can do to stop this, because the vast majority of people trying to do airdrops are very likely to hand over their info without a second thought. This has major repercussions, some of the worst repercussions we will see ever in crypto.
The best thing you can do if you're reading this, is to not give in to these new information whores, who are more than likely to flip your IDs on the darkweb for a profit.
It's very dangerous for you to trust these non-reputable individuals with your information and for the future of cryptos as a whole, yet no one is discussing this.
You can blame Polymath for this, they don't want to work harder filter to filter puppets, so instead they want your ID.
Edit: There is probably nothing we can do to stop this, because the vast majority of people trying to do airdrops are very likely to hand over their info without a second thought. This has major repercussions, some of the worst repercussions we will see ever in crypto.
The best thing you can do if you're reading this, is to not give in to these new information whores, who are more than likely to flip your IDs on the darkweb for a profit.
I agree, it is not a good trend and I fear it will only become worse in the future. Pay attention by sending your ID documents to the ICOs!
Not only your personal data will be used on some shady transaction but it can also lead to identity theft and many dangerous situation in the internet world. They can track your daily doings and encash by trying to sniff on your personal data sent and surveillance your everymove through social media accounts related to your data. I dont support this kind of thing in the crypto KYC is just a waste of time and can probably involved your data in some shady acts.
I'm not at all supportive of KYS in the bounty. And certainly not in advance when I do not know how many to me counted the Tokenes. I do KYS if I'm sure of ICO.
Not in all generosity is this condition, it all depends on what kind of project. If I believe in it bounty and it's promising, I fill out KYS. If the project is doubtful, no.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I think this is a way to control people who participate the bounty and restrict cheat by using multiple accounts. But I am also afraid some scam project can take away my information (images of identity card or driving license) to hack exchange account
I think it's good, because it would prevent or reduce the occurrence of multiple accounts or scams, but it remains a problem for young people who do not have documents
I think that this is the worst thing that developers could come up with today, because today many people have a very good goal to make a little money, but sec think a little differently.
Never submit a KYC form. As soon as I see one I abandon the project, its not worth the chance they are a scam so I just assume they are. That bounty will not be much of a success for sure. KYC are imposed only for those who want to invest and bounty hunters don't invest but only get and even if crypto is banned on that receiver's country, he can still fly to other country and spend it.
This is totally insane! Hunters dont need this kind of procedure. WELL, not just bounty hunters.I think even those investors dont need KYC "knowyour customer"
as it is digging our personal information for helping them promote their project
as it is digging our personal information for helping them promote their project
I think it's just a necessity. I don't think the team needs it either, because it's too much work for them to check all the data. These are the conditions that require the team of lawyers and exchanges in order for the team to have no problems and so that they can continue to equate their token
I am not familiar with any ICO project that needs a KYC for bounty since the bounty participants are just there to get some kind of tip because they supported the project not because they invested and supported the idea itself.
This is just an obstacle that some people do not want to pay for intentionally, because some people must not be able to pass KYC verification, and some people are unwilling to disclose their identity information. Therefore, the bounty participants do not receive 100% of the payment, and those tokens did not pay out are occupied by greedy bounty managers.
Jump to: