Topic: KYC of bounty hunters - page 34. (Read 6981 times)
I also don't know anything about that, now a lot of bounty programs that asking for KYC. they said it for long-term goals, but for details I do not know for what
I'm sure that the bounty program is one of the main structures in which it is worth participating now, since it is there that users can get tokens of the project and in the future sell them on the exchange
I think I'm going to take part in the bounty thread that doesn't need KYC.
Because the current KYC data cannot be well managed, so when we submit the information, it is completely possible to be leaked.
Because the current KYC data cannot be well managed, so when we submit the information, it is completely possible to be leaked.
KYC is impossible at this moment for bounties because of the nature of them... for example some have 400+ members and if this was true tey would need to offer much more payment to accomodate for the hassle to upload ID verification and such and it's a big ordeal many people would stop using this forum because it would be too annoying not to mention the lack of privacy.
Sometimes it sounds really irritating when bounties require that you pass KYC before you are awarded your tokens.If it was clearly stated at the beginning,then it is fine,but asking at the end of the campaign seems unfair.
I do not like to send my personal information to any projects. For this reason, I'm looking for projects that do not require me to do this.
This solution has undoubted advantages. And this is beneficial for honest participants due to the fact that multi-accounts will be cut off and accordingly there will be less participants and more rewards. I like this solution.
KYC is required in some bounty campaigns, which organizers usually warn participants in advance about it. I think its bad practice, because bounty participants are not investors in fact, and they are not affected by anti-money laundering legislation.
pay attention to the transfer KYC of your data at ico or bounty, because you can lose your money. and do not transfer your private key from the purse broadcast! can have bad consequences
The use of KYC for payment of gifts I think it will be difficult, because of the participants also do not necessarily want to. Because of the myriad of considerations regarding KYC, they fear if by charging by giving personal data is too risky. But if indeed the project with great results certainly will not be a problem for participants. But if the prize in May there is no price in the market will certainly be disappointed.
Typically, developers report this immediately after the end of the campaign. I would like it to be announced at the beginning of the campaign, so the distribution will be faster.
I think KYC should be applicable only in the invesors side due to the fact that they are the real holders of the more percentage of the coin.
i think traceto.io will be a good solution to this problem. actually kyc process is good for fake bounty hunters. at least the fakes will go out of the system.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
There is no biggie. as long as I get paid and no issue encountered on distribution, that was okay.KYC is okay for me, to lessen some using double or more account in a campaign.
On the one hand this is not good because we send our personal data but thanks to the KYC multi-accounts will not be there.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
Kyc are bad news for bounty hunters because some of them have multiple accounts, so they cannot accept some of their tokens that is why most bounty hunters do not agree having a kyc. I am worried in sending my own information because maybe they could use it to scam other people.
Others believed that it is not good since we are exposing ourselves to possible identity theft. We send information to sites we never knew that could only bring trouble for us. Yet their are countries where their governments do require this. On my part I felt the same as others do yet we have to do this to get rewards or else we won't be paid for the hard work we do. It is a sad situation for bounty hunters to receive only a very small amount of reward while being required to do it.
This is certainly a big stupidity, given that the figures involved are ridiculous. In any case, I do not send my data to an unknown entity for a few pennies.
kyc for bounty hounter seems unnecessary, because in my opinion the acquisition of coins that can be bounty hounter is very little and it is not feasible if using kyc. I agree the benefits of kyc is for the common good but I agree if kyc is only for investors.
I think this will make it hard for the bounty hunter because many beginners join the bounty hunter program to get capital in investing in this crypto currency, and it will make it harder for the participants to do their work.
Jump to: