[LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) - page 263.

BitThink

legendary

Activity: 882

Merit: 1000

Quote from: demzie on September 21, 2013, 04:45:15 PM

Well thats not the question.. Concerning that pic.
If you believe pics like that from users your even more down the road..

I don't even care about whether that's true or not. They gave an address and 'let the mining speak', then we saw 200G, 0G, 400G for 3 days. Lancoin has not said a word even after burnside put a warning on the trading page. TheSwede gave another broken promise. All these are facts. Let's just talk about facts now.

damiano

legendary

Activity: 1246

Merit: 1000

103 days, 21 hours and 10 minutes.

Will we see another sell off?

BitThink

legendary

Activity: 882

Merit: 1000

Could you believe they broke their promises even at this moment? Completely unbelievable!

demzie

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Well thats not the question.. Concerning that pic.
If you believe pics like that from users your even more down the road..

BitThink

legendary

Activity: 882

Merit: 1000

Quote from: demzie on September 21, 2013, 04:16:18 PM

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 21, 2013, 04:13:36 PM

Quote from: demzie on September 21, 2013, 04:10:42 PM

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 21, 2013, 04:02:49 PM

Quote from: radiumsoup on September 21, 2013, 03:45:34 PM

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 21, 2013, 01:46:47 PM

Quote from: abuelau on September 21, 2013, 01:28:09 PM

Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.

It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about. That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares

of course it's significant - without additional information, the only method we have of measuring hash rate is though manual calculation when a deposit is made. You're saying that the resulting per share value is too low to be a significant source of dividends, but that's not what's being discussed. The actual rate of (apparent) hashing is what is important to investors, and gives us an insight into the status of the production line. That's why the hash rate discussion is taking place.

A picture was recently posted of a list of Labcoins Avalon rigs listed in their pool profile. It would be impossible to dig these up though, this thread is too much of a mess. Fact is, they're using a few ancient avalons, NOT their own production. So this IS insignificant.

I read every single post and never seen that picture, just bullshit.
Fud

oh okay..

Hahahha shit you believe shit people post? If you believe something..
Read last posts of labcoin or theswede75..

All bullshit fud.. How would a forum member come by their login details to see that; hahaha

So do you believe TheSwede and Sam? Who promised 28 hours ago 'will post an update TODAY'? How long a day could be in their sence?

BitThink

legendary

Activity: 882

Merit: 1000

Quote from: demzie on September 21, 2013, 04:16:18 PM

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 21, 2013, 04:13:36 PM

Quote from: demzie on September 21, 2013, 04:10:42 PM

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 21, 2013, 04:02:49 PM

Quote from: radiumsoup on September 21, 2013, 03:45:34 PM

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 21, 2013, 01:46:47 PM

Quote from: abuelau on September 21, 2013, 01:28:09 PM

Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.

It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about. That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares

of course it's significant - without additional information, the only method we have of measuring hash rate is though manual calculation when a deposit is made. You're saying that the resulting per share value is too low to be a significant source of dividends, but that's not what's being discussed. The actual rate of (apparent) hashing is what is important to investors, and gives us an insight into the status of the production line. That's why the hash rate discussion is taking place.

A picture was recently posted of a list of Labcoins Avalon rigs listed in their pool profile. It would be impossible to dig these up though, this thread is too much of a mess. Fact is, they're using a few ancient avalons, NOT their own production. So this IS insignificant.

I read every single post and never seen that picture, just bullshit.
Fud

oh okay..

Hahahha shit you believe shit people post? If you believe something..
Read last posts of labcoin or theswede75..

All bullshit fud.. How would a forum member come by their login details to see that; hahaha

So do you believe TheSwede and Sam? Who promised 28 hours ago 'will post an update TODAY'?

damiano

legendary

Activity: 1246

Merit: 1000

103 days, 21 hours and 10 minutes.

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 21, 2013, 04:13:36 PM

Quote from: demzie on September 21, 2013, 04:10:42 PM

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 21, 2013, 04:02:49 PM

Quote from: radiumsoup on September 21, 2013, 03:45:34 PM

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 21, 2013, 01:46:47 PM

Quote from: abuelau on September 21, 2013, 01:28:09 PM

Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.

It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about. That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares

of course it's significant - without additional information, the only method we have of measuring hash rate is though manual calculation when a deposit is made. You're saying that the resulting per share value is too low to be a significant source of dividends, but that's not what's being discussed. The actual rate of (apparent) hashing is what is important to investors, and gives us an insight into the status of the production line. That's why the hash rate discussion is taking place.

A picture was recently posted of a list of Labcoins Avalon rigs listed in their pool profile. It would be impossible to dig these up though, this thread is too much of a mess. Fact is, they're using a few ancient avalons, NOT their own production. So this IS insignificant.

I read every single post and never seen that picture, just bullshit.
Fud

oh okay..

The payouts don't reflect the speed of 3 avalon's though...more likely 4 of them if anything but who really knows at this point. (but I get your point)

demzie

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 21, 2013, 04:13:36 PM

Quote from: demzie on September 21, 2013, 04:10:42 PM

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 21, 2013, 04:02:49 PM

Quote from: radiumsoup on September 21, 2013, 03:45:34 PM

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 21, 2013, 01:46:47 PM

Quote from: abuelau on September 21, 2013, 01:28:09 PM

Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.

It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about. That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares

of course it's significant - without additional information, the only method we have of measuring hash rate is though manual calculation when a deposit is made. You're saying that the resulting per share value is too low to be a significant source of dividends, but that's not what's being discussed. The actual rate of (apparent) hashing is what is important to investors, and gives us an insight into the status of the production line. That's why the hash rate discussion is taking place.

A picture was recently posted of a list of Labcoins Avalon rigs listed in their pool profile. It would be impossible to dig these up though, this thread is too much of a mess. Fact is, they're using a few ancient avalons, NOT their own production. So this IS insignificant.

I read every single post and never seen that picture, just bullshit.
Fud

oh okay..

Hahahha shit you believe shit people post? If you believe something..
Read last posts of labcoin or theswede75..

All bullshit fud.. How would a forum member come by their login details to see that; hahaha

redbeans2012

hero member

Activity: 887

Merit: 1000

they sold one of these a couple months back, maybe more but I cant read whatever language he speaks

VolanicEruptor

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Quote from: demzie on September 21, 2013, 04:10:42 PM

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 21, 2013, 04:02:49 PM

Quote from: radiumsoup on September 21, 2013, 03:45:34 PM

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 21, 2013, 01:46:47 PM

Quote from: abuelau on September 21, 2013, 01:28:09 PM

Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.

It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about. That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares

of course it's significant - without additional information, the only method we have of measuring hash rate is though manual calculation when a deposit is made. You're saying that the resulting per share value is too low to be a significant source of dividends, but that's not what's being discussed. The actual rate of (apparent) hashing is what is important to investors, and gives us an insight into the status of the production line. That's why the hash rate discussion is taking place.

A picture was recently posted of a list of Labcoins Avalon rigs listed in their pool profile. It would be impossible to dig these up though, this thread is too much of a mess. Fact is, they're using a few ancient avalons, NOT their own production. So this IS insignificant.

I read every single post and never seen that picture, just bullshit.
Fud

oh okay..

demzie

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 21, 2013, 04:02:49 PM

Quote from: radiumsoup on September 21, 2013, 03:45:34 PM

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 21, 2013, 01:46:47 PM

Quote from: abuelau on September 21, 2013, 01:28:09 PM

Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.

It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about. That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares

of course it's significant - without additional information, the only method we have of measuring hash rate is though manual calculation when a deposit is made. You're saying that the resulting per share value is too low to be a significant source of dividends, but that's not what's being discussed. The actual rate of (apparent) hashing is what is important to investors, and gives us an insight into the status of the production line. That's why the hash rate discussion is taking place.

A picture was recently posted of a list of Labcoins Avalon rigs listed in their pool profile. It would be impossible to dig these up though, this thread is too much of a mess. Fact is, they're using a few ancient avalons, NOT their own production. So this IS insignificant.

I read every single post and never seen that picture, just bullshit.
Fud

VolanicEruptor

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Quote from: radiumsoup on September 21, 2013, 03:45:34 PM

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 21, 2013, 01:46:47 PM

Quote from: abuelau on September 21, 2013, 01:28:09 PM

Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.

It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about. That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares

of course it's significant - without additional information, the only method we have of measuring hash rate is though manual calculation when a deposit is made. You're saying that the resulting per share value is too low to be a significant source of dividends, but that's not what's being discussed. The actual rate of (apparent) hashing is what is important to investors, and gives us an insight into the status of the production line. That's why the hash rate discussion is taking place.

A picture was recently posted of a list of Labcoins Avalon rigs listed in their pool profile. It would be impossible to dig these up though, this thread is too much of a mess. Fact is, they're using a few ancient avalons, NOT their own production. So this IS insignificant.

TMAN

legendary

Activity: 1414

Merit: 1808

Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do

So what's up with these payments?

radiumsoup

sr. member

Activity: 356

Merit: 255

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 21, 2013, 01:46:47 PM

Quote from: abuelau on September 21, 2013, 01:28:09 PM

Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.

It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about. That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares

of course it's significant - without additional information, the only method we have of measuring hash rate is though manual calculation when a deposit is made. You're saying that the resulting per share value is too low to be a significant source of dividends, but that's not what's being discussed. The actual rate of (apparent) hashing is what is important to investors, and gives us an insight into the status of the production line. That's why the hash rate discussion is taking place.

TMAN

legendary

Activity: 1414

Merit: 1808

Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do

So guestimates what are we hashing at?

VolanicEruptor

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Quote from: weaknesswaran on September 21, 2013, 02:51:02 PM

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 21, 2013, 02:44:11 PM

Quote from: abuelau on September 21, 2013, 02:39:13 PM

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 21, 2013, 01:46:47 PM

Quote from: abuelau on September 21, 2013, 01:28:09 PM

Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.

It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about. That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares

Okay so from now on we refer to 300gh/s as "Valdemort".

Sorry, I don't watch Teddy Ruxpin so I don't get the joke..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Voldemort

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBxPZn0VsGQ&list=PLD2748F698F4B8C1C

weaknesswaran

hero member

Activity: 964

Merit: 509

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 21, 2013, 02:44:11 PM

Quote from: abuelau on September 21, 2013, 02:39:13 PM

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 21, 2013, 01:46:47 PM

Quote from: abuelau on September 21, 2013, 01:28:09 PM

Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.

It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about. That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares

Okay so from now on we refer to 300gh/s as "Valdemort".

Sorry, I don't watch Teddy Ruxpin so I don't get the joke..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Voldemort

VolanicEruptor

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Quote from: abuelau on September 21, 2013, 02:39:13 PM

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 21, 2013, 01:46:47 PM

Quote from: abuelau on September 21, 2013, 01:28:09 PM

Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.

It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about. That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares

Okay so from now on we refer to 300gh/s as "Valdemort".

Sorry, I don't watch Teddy Ruxpin so I don't get the joke..

abuelau

hero member

Activity: 750

Merit: 500

www.coinschedule.com

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 21, 2013, 01:46:47 PM

Quote from: abuelau on September 21, 2013, 01:28:09 PM

Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.

It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about. That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares

Okay so from now on we refer to 300gh/s as "Valdemort".

Puppet

legendary

Activity: 980

Merit: 1040

Quote from: Pompobit on September 21, 2013, 02:35:08 PM

Quote from: Puppet on September 21, 2013, 02:23:36 PM

Why dont you ask TheSeven if there is a snowballs chance in hell this chip will be deployed this year. Im guessing you already did but didnt feel like posting that part.

something similar has been asked to him yesterday:

Quote

[15:44] <[7]> does that 500th/s plan involve 65nm chips?
[15:44] <[7]> this weird TSMC document suggests they're planning to do 65nm in Q1 2014
...
[15:48] <[7]> I'm confident that the interface circuitry for 65nm will be finalized this year, but I have no idea who's even going to implement the hashing core.
[15:48] <[7]> if they want me to do that, it would take months, and I wouldn't be very confident that it's going to actually work well
[15:48] <[7]> it's a complete redesign from scratch. at least if their plans haven't changed.

Gee, who'd have thought? IO might be done this year and thats by far the easiest and least critical part for a bitcoin chip.
Sounds like a tape out this year isnt even in the cards and that would make deployment by summer 2014 optimistic. Well good luck labcoin investors!

Topic: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) - page 263. (Read 1079974 times)