Topic: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) - page 372. (Read 1079974 times)
September 17, 2013, 10:42:28 PM
September 17, 2013, 10:35:38 PM
One of these times they are going to do something right.
September 17, 2013, 10:27:21 PM
I suspect they won't post the mining address; just a wallet address that they'll say their mining income goes into.
Yea, that's really possible.They will just do it wrong in every possible way. (as usual)
If this is true, this will be...
September 17, 2013, 10:18:52 PM
I suspect they won't post the mining address; just a wallet address that they'll say their mining income goes into.
Yea, that's really possible.They will just do it wrong in every possible way. (as usual)
September 17, 2013, 10:18:48 PM
I suspect they won't post the mining address; just a wallet address that they'll say their mining income goes into.
I suspect neither TheSwede75 nor Labcoin have direct access to the operation.
I suspect neither TheSwede75 nor Labcoin have direct access to the operation.
Any funds transferred to their public address can be traced back to the block they were mined. That solves nothing.
September 17, 2013, 10:13:49 PM
Not sure whats taking the market so long to tank this stock right now, the announcement tomorrow is probably going to be horrendous or else they would have released it today.
Why are they buying time ?
Once they post the address we will be able to see exactly when any blocks were mined (if any). It really doesn't make sense to stall.
Please post a picture of 'hashing' rigs and the public address.
September 17, 2013, 09:50:44 PM
Not sure whats taking the market so long to tank this stock right now, the announcement tomorrow is probably going to be horrendous or else they would have released it today.
I tend to agree. 20 hours can't make any meaningful difference.
And they keep talking about the end of October to make a decision. Simple fact is that no one is going to wait that long.
But I just can't bring myself to dump. I want to, but I can't.
Too much love, not enough facts.
September 17, 2013, 09:49:16 PM
Not sure whats taking the market so long to tank this stock right now, the announcement tomorrow is probably going to be horrendous or else they would have released it today.
I tend to agree. 20 hours can't make any meaningful difference.
And they keep talking about the end of October to make a decision. Simple fact is that no one is going to wait that long.
But I just can't bring myself to dump. I want to, but I can't.
September 17, 2013, 09:47:09 PM
Not sure whats taking the market so long to tank this stock right now, the announcement tomorrow is probably going to be horrendous or else they would have released it today.
Why are they buying time ?
September 17, 2013, 09:45:02 PM
Not sure whats taking the market so long to tank this stock right now, the announcement tomorrow is probably going to be horrendous or else they would have released it today.
September 17, 2013, 09:43:42 PM
Even they post the address and stats, I don't expect a very good result. Otherwise, labcoin will not keep saying 'in one month'. They are betting on their second batch and the new team to whom they outsourced the deploying.
September 17, 2013, 09:30:28 PM
Do they think playing the game of words (before vs no later than, etc) is funny or beneficial to the market price? Their PR is full of non-sense and I've already asked numerous questions that always were ignored by the LC team (last question was clarification on generated blocks, no answer).
Management has been playing word games for months. They're clearly stalling and are unwilling to level with shareholders.
September 17, 2013, 09:18:25 PM
Sorry, but I feel like I need to do this: *Their*. "They're" means "they are". Its not just you, I see this all day long on these forums.
Corrected, TY. As a non-native speaker, these kind of phonetic mistakes are rare from me, probably means I've spent too much time here
By the way, "It's just not you" vs "Its just not you"... LOL
September 17, 2013, 09:14:41 PM
Correct, as long as the coins come from generated inputs, they can safely be fanned out to shareholder addresses (BTC-TC I guess) once the mined blocks have matured, while still allowing transparency on the fact that the funds come from mining and not from other sources.
Thanks. So do you have any idea why they keep delaying, what would you do in this situation?
I don't know why they keep the mining address secret, if they are already hashing, that means they are not yet willing to expose the real situation for about 19 more hours. This is puzzling to say the least: what could possibly happen in 19 hours that make it possible to expose the situation, when it seems impossible now?
Do they think playing the game of words (before vs no later than, etc) is funny or beneficial to the market price? They're PR is full of non-sense and I've already asked numerous questions that always were ignored by the LC team (last question was clarification on generated blocks, no answer).
September 17, 2013, 09:11:08 PM
Correct, as long as the coins come from generated inputs, they can safely be fanned out to shareholder addresses (BTC-TC I guess) once the mined blocks have matured, while still allowing transparency on the fact that the funds come from mining and not from other sources.
Thanks. So do you have any idea why they keep delaying, what would you do in this situation?
I don't know why they keep the mining address secret, if they are already hashing, that means they are not yet willing to expose the real situation for about 19 more hours. This is puzzling to say the least: what could possibly happen in 19 hours that make it possible to expose the situation, when it seems impossible now?
Do they think playing the game of words (before vs no later than, etc) is funny or beneficial to the market price? Their PR is full of non-sense and I've already asked numerous questions that always were ignored by the LC team (last question was clarification on generated blocks, no answer).
September 17, 2013, 09:04:12 PM
Guys, it's official, I want back in!
Code:
Received Bid Order: 100000 @ 0.0001 BTC
Placed Purchase Order #2742476: 100000 @ 0.0001 BTC.
be careful what you wish for, you might just get it!
September 17, 2013, 09:03:57 PM
Correct, as long as the coins come from generated inputs, they can safely be fanned out to shareholder addresses (BTC-TC I guess) once the mined blocks have matured, while still allowing transparency on the fact that the funds come from mining and not from other sources.
Thanks. So do you have any idea why they keep delaying, what would you do in this situation?
September 17, 2013, 09:02:09 PM
Guys, it's official, I want back in!
Code:
Received Bid Order: 100000 @ 0.0001 BTC
Placed Purchase Order #2742476: 100000 @ 0.0001 BTC.
The labcoin team would have to be arrested for it to go that low
who knows, good luck! September 17, 2013, 09:00:53 PM
I would rather used a shared wallet.dat with keypoolsize=100000 or something like that.
Industrial solo miners know about this, so I expect them to do as well
Industrial solo miners know about this, so I expect them to do as well
But you still want to move all the coins because they need to be paid out right? I might be wrong but moving them through a known address is what you would do to prove your mining.
Correct, as long as the coins come from generated inputs, they can safely be fanned out to shareholder addresses (BTC-TC I guess) once the mined blocks have matured, while still allowing transparency on the fact that the funds come from mining and not from other sources.
September 17, 2013, 08:58:49 PM
I would rather used a shared wallet.dat with keypoolsize=100000 or something like that.
Industrial solo miners know about this, so I expect them to do as well
Industrial solo miners know about this, so I expect them to do as well
But you still want to move all the coins because they need to be paid out right? I might be wrong but moving them through a known address is what you would do to prove your mining.
Jump to: