[LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) - page 445.

velacreations

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: labcoin on September 14, 2013, 11:10:45 AM

We are here to stay and everyone who is having doubts will have to change his opinion once we show what we achieved.
Again, we advise anyone to purchase more shares now that they are cheap.

and then "someone" purchased 5500 shares... Roll Eyes

ferskvare

newbie

Activity: 38

Merit: 0

Quote

We are here to stay and everyone who is having doubts will have to change his opinion once we show what we achieved.
Again, we advise anyone to purchase more shares now that they are cheap.

I'm still holding. I hope you will be having everything up and running soon. It's hard for some of us investors who actually have faith in you to stand against the tides of nay-sayers. All that happens to me if you are not what you say you are, is I lose some virtual coins, so I am not fussed. Your company and everyone affiliated with it will be discredited for the rest of internet history if it's a scam, so I'm pretty sure I am not the one taking a risk here.

I try to feel confident in you, Labcoin. Please don't make us regret weathering the storm

velacreations

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: labcoin on September 14, 2013, 11:10:45 AM

We are here to stay and everyone who is having doubts will have to change his opinion once we show what we achieved.
Again, we advise anyone to purchase more shares now that they are cheap.

when will you show what you achieved? you have promised that a few times, now, and have failed to deliver.

Zakryze

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Quote from: labcoin on September 14, 2013, 11:10:45 AM

Quote from: RoadStress on September 14, 2013, 11:07:51 AM

Quote from: labcoin on September 13, 2013, 09:13:43 PM

We do believe in what we are doing and we will continue with the usual energy and dedication.
Again, advice for those who are holding is to wait until 30/10/2013 to take any final decision, those interested in acquiring
shares should just take advantage of the current cheap prices.

Quote

Last Active: Today at 04:57:41 PM

Goodbye Labcoin!

We are here to stay and everyone who is having doubts will have to change his opinion once we show what we achieved.
Again, we advise anyone to purchase more shares now that they are cheap.

hahahahahahahahahaha take a picture of what you achieved.

afrotec

full member

Activity: 127

Merit: 100

Coinnoisseur

Quote from: labcoin on September 14, 2013, 11:10:45 AM

Quote from: RoadStress on September 14, 2013, 11:07:51 AM

Quote from: labcoin on September 13, 2013, 09:13:43 PM

We do believe in what we are doing and we will continue with the usual energy and dedication.
Again, advice for those who are holding is to wait until 30/10/2013 to take any final decision, those interested in acquiring
shares should just take advantage of the current cheap prices.

Quote

Last Active: Today at 04:57:41 PM

Goodbye Labcoin!

We are here to stay and everyone who is having doubts will have to change his opinion once we show what we achieved.
Again, we advise anyone to purchase more shares now that they are cheap.

Why cant you post a video or something?

Live feed of the lab... Something!!!!!

velacreations

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: JohnyBigs on September 14, 2013, 11:05:02 AM

even if they hashed at 2TH at 100% run time, who cares.

probably the 1M+ shares that were sold yesterday...

labcoin

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Labcoin.com

Quote from: RoadStress on September 14, 2013, 11:07:51 AM

Quote from: labcoin on September 13, 2013, 09:13:43 PM

We do believe in what we are doing and we will continue with the usual energy and dedication.
Again, advice for those who are holding is to wait until 30/10/2013 to take any final decision, those interested in acquiring
shares should just take advantage of the current cheap prices.

Quote

Last Active: Today at 04:57:41 PM

Goodbye Labcoin!

We are here to stay and everyone who is having doubts will have to change his opinion once we show what we achieved.
Again, we advise anyone to purchase more shares now that they are cheap.

RoadStress

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1007

Quote from: labcoin on September 13, 2013, 09:13:43 PM

We do believe in what we are doing and we will continue with the usual energy and dedication.
Again, advice for those who are holding is to wait until 30/10/2013 to take any final decision, those interested in acquiring
shares should just take advantage of the current cheap prices.

Quote

Last Active: Today at 04:57:41 PM

Goodbye Labcoin!

JohnyBigs

sr. member

Activity: 560

Merit: 250

Quote from: drawingthesun on September 14, 2013, 10:59:21 AM

Quote from: drawingthesun on September 14, 2013, 10:39:41 AM

Quote from: Mabsark on September 14, 2013, 10:35:03 AM

The obvious reason for those chips being missing is because they are being mined with.

It's funny the way none of the FUD-spreaders can come up with a logical argument against this.

If they have a rig, then posting the rig and assembled boards makes more sense than posting these parts. (In fact why not just post both?)

There is no evidence pointing towards a 2TH/s rig existing at all. Its likely the missing chips have been taken off to do hash testing (and they got a few to hash) but no combined rig exists and their 2TH/s claim comes from a expectation that full assembly would have been far easier than it actually is.

Have they actually been solomining with a 2TH/s rig? I don't think so. Have they taken some chips and managed to maybe get them to hash? Perhaps.

I'm quoting myself because I think its the best explanation for the mining and I want Johny and Mabsark to respond. See if they think my scenario is illogical.

No its very logical, that's what I said they probably got a bunch of boards to run for 2th for a bit until they ran into problems, but again even if they hashed at 2TH at 100% run time, who cares. 2TH is nothing compared to 50-500TH when all said and done. 2TH mining doesn't excite me when they get up to 10-20 then I'll care.

Again they have chips and boards only a matter of time before everything is tweaked and works as intended.

boyohi

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

Quote from: klee on September 14, 2013, 10:26:39 AM

Quote from: boyohi on September 14, 2013, 10:08:23 AM

Quote from: Bitcycle on September 14, 2013, 10:03:26 AM

Quote from: demzie on September 14, 2013, 09:59:47 AM

And if they are not hashing, they are not hashing?!! so whats the problem? Go invest in ASICMINER; get lost!

I'm going to stay right here.

And say it again-

They are not hashing. They have nothing online.

They do not have an assembled board.

They never said they were not hashing. They just said 2TH but not 100% up time need tweaks. I'm perfectly fine holding on to LC. I do admit they need some PR lessons but things aren't looking too well on AM also.

I own both AM and LC.

Is your stomach ok? Wink

Ironclad

JohnyBigs

sr. member

Activity: 560

Merit: 250

Quote from: velacreations on September 14, 2013, 10:57:15 AM

Quote from: JohnyBigs on September 14, 2013, 10:54:15 AM

What would a mining address prove if they didn't hash for long enough to find a block?

photos of assembled hardware would prove that they have assembled hardware.

I admit, a mining address is worthless if they aren't mining. So, we can assume they are not mining, right?

Most likely they arent or at least continually they said themselves they need to tweak the boards still so they run 100%

drawingthesun

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1015

Quote from: drawingthesun on September 14, 2013, 10:39:41 AM

Quote from: Mabsark on September 14, 2013, 10:35:03 AM

The obvious reason for those chips being missing is because they are being mined with.

It's funny the way none of the FUD-spreaders can come up with a logical argument against this.

If they have a rig, then posting the rig and assembled boards makes more sense than posting these parts. (In fact why not just post both?)

There is no evidence pointing towards a 2TH/s rig existing at all. Its likely the missing chips have been taken off to do hash testing (and they got a few to hash) but no combined rig exists and their 2TH/s claim comes from a expectation that full assembly would have been far easier than it actually is.

Have they actually been solomining with a 2TH/s rig? I don't think so. Have they taken some chips and managed to maybe get them to hash? Perhaps.

I'm quoting myself because I think its the best explanation for the mining and I want Johny and Mabsark to respond. See if they think my scenario is illogical.

velacreations

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: AM4Bitcoin on September 14, 2013, 10:57:48 AM

Hash on a pool, is it that hard?

It is, if you don't have assembled hardware... Grin

AM4Bitcoin

full member

Activity: 189

Merit: 100

Quote from: JohnyBigs on September 14, 2013, 10:54:15 AM

Quote from: velacreations on September 14, 2013, 10:51:29 AM

Quote from: JohnyBigs on September 14, 2013, 10:48:45 AM

They most likely hashed for a short while until they ran into issues, hence their statement of the boards not being 100% for 24/7 mining. No other way to explain missing chips they clearly used them for something.

Secondly, if you have chips and boards in your hand its only a matter of time before you get everything to work.

hmm, and all they had to do was post photos of assembled hardware... or post a mining address...

What would a mining address prove if they didn't hash for long enough to find a block?

Hash on a pool, is it that hard?

velacreations

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: JohnyBigs on September 14, 2013, 10:54:15 AM

What would a mining address prove if they didn't hash for long enough to find a block?

photos of assembled hardware would prove that they have assembled hardware.

I admit, a mining address is worthless if they aren't mining. So, we can assume they are not mining, right?

BombaUcigasa

legendary

Activity: 1442

Merit: 1005

Quote from: velacreations on September 14, 2013, 10:51:29 AM

Quote from: JohnyBigs on September 14, 2013, 10:48:45 AM

They most likely hashed for a short while until they ran into issues, hence their statement of the boards not being 100% for 24/7 mining. No other way to explain missing chips they clearly used them for something.

Secondly, if you have chips and boards in your hand its only a matter of time before you get everything to work.

hmm, and all they had to do was post photos of assembled hardware... or post a mining address...

I can post those in like 3 minutes if they buy me 20% in my share evaluation... why is it difficult for them?

Again, has nobody considered my post with pictures here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3152956 ?

JohnyBigs

sr. member

Activity: 560

Merit: 250

Quote from: velacreations on September 14, 2013, 10:51:29 AM

Quote from: JohnyBigs on September 14, 2013, 10:48:45 AM

They most likely hashed for a short while until they ran into issues, hence their statement of the boards not being 100% for 24/7 mining. No other way to explain missing chips they clearly used them for something.

Secondly, if you have chips and boards in your hand its only a matter of time before you get everything to work.

hmm, and all they had to do was post photos of assembled hardware... or post a mining address...

What would a mining address prove if they didn't hash for long enough to find a block?

velacreations

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: JohnyBigs on September 14, 2013, 10:48:45 AM

They most likely hashed for a short while until they ran into issues, hence their statement of the boards not being 100% for 24/7 mining. No other way to explain missing chips they clearly used them for something.

Secondly, if you have chips and boards in your hand its only a matter of time before you get everything to work.

hmm, and all they had to do was post photos of assembled hardware... or post a mining address...

Bitcycle

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Quote from: JohnyBigs on September 14, 2013, 10:48:45 AM

Secondly, if you have chips and boards in your hand its only a matter of time before you get everything to work.

Unless the chips and/or boards don't work at all.

JohnyBigs

sr. member

Activity: 560

Merit: 250

Quote from: kokojie on September 14, 2013, 10:43:28 AM

Quote from: JohnyBigs on September 14, 2013, 10:41:49 AM

Quote from: Mabsark on September 14, 2013, 10:35:03 AM

Quote from: drawingthesun on September 14, 2013, 10:31:43 AM

Quote from: boyohi on September 14, 2013, 10:08:23 AM

I own both AM and LC.

If they have a rig why not post pictures?

No idea.

Look at this picture though. Notice how some of the chips are missing?

The obvious reason for those chips being missing is because they are being mined with.

It's funny the way none of the FUD-spreaders can come up with a logical argument against this.

Like I said before even if they are mining 2TH is nothing compared to 20TH in about 3 weeks, then 50TH, then 500TH. The fact that they have chips and boards is amazing when all the other companies just have dicks in their hands. Its only a matter of time they get everything worked out and 100, 000 chips come online.

I can have some chips in my hands too, can I prove they can hash? No. Did labcoin prove their chips can hash? No, so Labcoin has basically the samething as I do, just some chips.

The difference is labcoin claimed they can indeed hash, and is actually hashing at supposedly 4TH atm, yet they refuse to provide ANY proof at all.

They most likely hashed for a short while until they ran into issues, hence their statement of the boards not being 100% for 24/7 mining. No other way to explain missing chips they clearly used them for something.

Secondly, if you have chips and boards in your hand its only a matter of time before you get everything to work.

Topic: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) - page 445. (Read 1079974 times)