Topic: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) - page 79. (Read 1079974 times)
October 01, 2013, 02:40:13 PM
where is dividend?
October 01, 2013, 02:31:05 PM
October 01, 2013, 02:29:59 PM
Alessia Tatti responds to my facebook inquiry:
"? I don't know who you are, i don't understand what you're talking about and i don't know what you want from me, if you have problems with my brother talk to him."
"? I don't know who you are, i don't understand what you're talking about and i don't know what you want from me, if you have problems with my brother talk to him."
can you be careful not to harass people. there is a fine line to getting info do it in a courteous way for the time being.
also, since you are reaching out to people try howard since he's the main guy behind the chip, he will know who paid him, what was designed etc at this time he may have quite a lot of information that's of use. do so in a courteous way.
October 01, 2013, 02:27:32 PM
Alessia Tatti responds to my facebook inquiry:
"? I don't know who you are, i don't understand what you're talking about and i don't know what you want from me, if you have problems with my brother talk to him."
"? I don't know who you are, i don't understand what you're talking about and i don't know what you want from me, if you have problems with my brother talk to him."
Can you screenshot that?
October 01, 2013, 02:24:50 PM
Alessia Tatti responds to my facebook inquiry:
"? I don't know who you are, i don't understand what you're talking about and i don't know what you want from me, if you have problems with my brother talk to him."
"? I don't know who you are, i don't understand what you're talking about and i don't know what you want from me, if you have problems with my brother talk to him."
October 01, 2013, 02:18:17 PM
Sam said the 2nd in the Q & A
October 01, 2013, 02:16:00 PM
I haven't been around recently. It's Tuesday. Aren't we supposed to get Labcoin dividends today? I haven't gotten mine yet.
lol
lol
October 01, 2013, 01:20:59 PM
Do not forget "Sam" said he was thinking about buying back shares
Really? Source? If it's about the refund, he pretty much said the contrary.It was mentioned In q&a
Each share would be worth about .0006
Here's the http://pastebin.com/RSa1JPvM
CTRL+F 'repurchasing'
There's a difference between a share buyback and a refund (which seems to be what ishkur is referencing).
A 'refund' would give back the IPO funds that haven not yet been spent. If there was 50% of the funds remaining, each share would receive IPO price * .5 - .0005. Sam has explicitly said that this is not on the table.
A share buyback would use funds (most likely non-IPO funds) to purchase shares on the market and either decrease the outstanding shares to less than 10 Million or to increase the founders' (or Sam's) number of shares.
October 01, 2013, 01:20:44 PM
It was mentioned In q&a
Each share would be worth about .0006
Exact source please. I read the Q&A and saw nothing of the sort.Each share would be worth about .0006
It wasn't about refund more like a buyback. It was just one sentence and I can't search on my iPhone. I asked radium to ask him to expand but didn't happen
October 01, 2013, 01:14:40 PM
Do not forget "Sam" said he was thinking about buying back shares
Really? Source? If it's about the refund, he pretty much said the contrary.It was mentioned In q&a
Each share would be worth about .0006
October 01, 2013, 01:10:44 PM
Do not forget "Sam" said he was thinking about buying back shares
October 01, 2013, 01:07:31 PM
Investors have taken it up the ass on this one, and there is no way that either of the Tatti's should be allowed to walk away.
As it is illegal to issue unregistered shares in China, and Tatti spends his time in Shenzhen, it is obvious as to why he is trying to separate himself from the company, and the fallout. Good luck with that.
As it is illegal to issue unregistered shares in China, and Tatti spends his time in Shenzhen, it is obvious as to why he is trying to separate himself from the company, and the fallout. Good luck with that.
October 01, 2013, 12:48:41 PM
Their is a large demand for shares rite now. It seems people are wanting back in.
October 01, 2013, 11:13:01 AM
Can anyone speculate as to who/why there are bids at .002+ wellin to the 100,000+
Because the panic spreaders could not convince enough of the weak minded to sell into their bids. Now they are scrambling to get their position back.
October 01, 2013, 11:02:46 AM
Can anyone speculate as to who/why there are bids at .002+ wellin to the 100,000+
The same reason they were at .001, .0008, .0006,.0005,.0004,.0003, and now .0002, so they can lose 50% when it goes to .00009
October 01, 2013, 10:59:02 AM
Can anyone speculate as to who/why there are bids at .002+ wellin to the 100,000+
October 01, 2013, 10:19:12 AM
This is excellent and is exactly what this thread should be used for. Please take the conspiracy theories to another thread, thanks.
That is cute.
I don't remember you listening when others asked you to stop spreading FUD, and back then Labcoin seemed to be less of a scam compared to now.
I wasn't spreading FUD. I genuinely believed it was a scam. I never held shares until a couple of days ago and therefore had no motive to spread FUD hundreds of pages ago.
People need to start using the correct terms for what they are describing and stop making baseless accusations.
Labcoin is not a scam and therefore your comment suggesting otherwise is wrong.
EDIT: I am trying to be constructive and make a positive contribution to this thread. I will continue to do so regardless of what others say.
Haha, once the share price collapses and you think you can make a buck on a rebound, you decide it's not a scam. Well it's good to see you will be losing your money too then.
Yet another person challenging me simply because I have no problem with being honest about my intentions. Ironic really.
Let's recap. I thought it was a scam three weeks ago and said so vehemently, much like the majority are doing today. Then a couple of days ago I decided the price was so low that a small investment of 15btc had a manageable risk-return due to the small but reasonable possibility that it wasn't a scam. Then Labcoin Sam missed the IRC 24 hour deadline and my only explanation was that it was indeed a scam, so I sold which triggered a price crash. On the news the IRC chat was to happen, I bought back in at a loss and now believe it is not a scam. Show me where I have failed to follow logic in these decisions. I haven't made any profit from flipping as some of you suggest. I have thirtyfive thousand shares from having owned fourtyfive thousand. I am genuinely not attempting to manipulate the price for my own gain, I have the shares now and will let it run it's full course regardless of price. I am the boy who cried wolf and understand why so many of you resent me especially as I have occupied both sides of this scam debate.
October 01, 2013, 10:09:42 AM
Very minor compared to how many people he has destroyed in Labcoin.
Nice stockholm syndrome btw
Nice stockholm syndrome btw
just wait, there will be a rush of people here to blame critics for the fall of Labcon. They won't blame themselves, they won't blame Labcon, they'll blame people who didn't buy into the scam.
Fact. Happened already with ActM:
What a load of wank.
The shares are falling because of FUD from crumbs, Ice, and Pankkake.
...
The shares are falling because of FUD from crumbs, Ice, and Pankkake.
...
October 01, 2013, 09:37:58 AM
Very minor compared to how many people he has destroyed in Labcoin.
Nice stockholm syndrome btw
Nice stockholm syndrome btw
just wait, there will be a rush of people here to blame critics for the fall of Labcon. They won't blame themselves, they won't blame Labcon, they'll blame people who didn't buy into the scam.
Fact. Happened already with ActM:
What a load of wank.
The shares are falling because of FUD from crumbs, Ice, and Pankkake.
...
The shares are falling because of FUD from crumbs, Ice, and Pankkake.
...
October 01, 2013, 09:10:24 AM
Very minor compared to how many people he has destroyed in Labcoin.
Nice stockholm syndrome btw
Nice stockholm syndrome btw
just wait, there will be a rush of people here to blame critics for the fall of Labcon. They won't blame themselves, they won't blame Labcon, they'll blame people who didn't buy into the scam.
Jump to: