Topic: Make sure you pay your taxes to the government that spies on you! - page 10. (Read 5588 times)

...snip...
I'm not. I'm not going to kill you simply for disagreeing with me. You, on the other hand, have no problem with paying the people who would kill me for disagreeing with you.

Well you pay your taxes as well - I don't think that entitles me to kill you.

Any taxes I pay, I pay under duress. Giving the mugger your wallet doesn't mean you support being mugged. You, on the other hand, gladly hand over the wallet to the mugger, and tell everyone how resisting the mugger is wrong.

And if I should refuse to hand over the wallet, you would applaud when he shot me down.

I'm glad you've come back to your senses. It would have been a strange turn if I had to lecture you on the NAP and how it applies to free speech.

Tsk... You seem to think I have changed my stance. You're still threatening me with lethal force.

You said you would kill me if I disagreed with you.

No, that's how you misinterpreted my statement.

Really?

Quote from: cryptoanarchist on May 19, 2013, 11:23:57 AM

...snip...

You see, Hawker, we practice what we preach. So do you, but what you preach is support for mass murderers.

...snip...

Quote from: cryptoanarchist on May 19, 2013, 10:58:18 AM

...snip...
Trust me, Hawker, given the chance I'd choke you to death with my bare hands.
...snip...

...snip...

Then I would suggest you not advocate support for government mass murder whilst within my reach.

That post from cryptoanarchist is a direct threat. Your posts in support of it are supporting that threat and amplifying it saying you would also kill me.

As I said, I am glad you backed away from that nonsense. You can never further an argument with a threat.

myrkul

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM

Quote from: Hawker on May 19, 2013, 12:47:41 PM

Quote from: myrkul on May 19, 2013, 12:31:48 PM

...snip...
I'm not. I'm not going to kill you simply for disagreeing with me. You, on the other hand, have no problem with paying the people who would kill me for disagreeing with you.

Well you pay your taxes as well - I don't think that entitles me to kill you.

Any taxes I pay, I pay under duress. Giving the mugger your wallet doesn't mean you support being mugged. You, on the other hand, gladly hand over the wallet to the mugger, and tell everyone how resisting the mugger is wrong.

And if I should refuse to hand over the wallet, you would applaud when he shot me down.

Quote from: myrkul on May 19, 2013, 12:31:48 PM

I'm glad you've come back to your senses. It would have been a strange turn if I had to lecture you on the NAP and how it applies to free speech.

Tsk... You seem to think I have changed my stance. You're still threatening me with lethal force.

You said you would kill me if I disagreed with you.

No, that's how you misinterpreted my statement.

Hawker

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1001

...snip...
I'm not. I'm not going to kill you simply for disagreeing with me. You, on the other hand, have no problem with paying the people who would kill me for disagreeing with you.

Well you pay your taxes as well - I don't think that entitles me to kill you.

Any taxes I pay, I pay under duress. Giving the mugger your wallet doesn't mean you support being mugged. You, on the other hand, gladly hand over the wallet to the mugger, and tell everyone how resisting the mugger is wrong.

And if I should refuse to hand over the wallet, you would applaud when he shot me down.

I'm glad you've come back to your senses. It would have been a strange turn if I had to lecture you on the NAP and how it applies to free speech.

Tsk... You seem to think I have changed my stance. You're still threatening me with lethal force.

You said you would kill me if I disagreed with you. Now you say you would not. That's a change of stance. I admire you for doing it - its hard to reverse gear on a public forum.

myrkul

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM

...snip...
I'm not. I'm not going to kill you simply for disagreeing with me. You, on the other hand, have no problem with paying the people who would kill me for disagreeing with you.

Well you pay your taxes as well - I don't think that entitles me to kill you.

Any taxes I pay, I pay under duress. Giving the mugger your wallet doesn't mean you support being mugged. You, on the other hand, gladly hand over the wallet to the mugger, and tell everyone how resisting the mugger is wrong.

And if I should refuse to hand over the wallet, you would applaud when he shot me down.

I'm glad you've come back to your senses. It would have been a strange turn if I had to lecture you on the NAP and how it applies to free speech.

Tsk... You seem to think I have changed my stance. You're still threatening me with lethal force.

Hawker

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Hawker on May 19, 2013, 12:16:30 PM

...snip...
I'm not. I'm not going to kill you for disagreeing with me. You, on the other hand, have no problem with paying the people who would kill me for disagreeing with you.

Well you pay your taxes as well and your government could have me arrested - I don't think that entitles me to kill you.

I'm glad you've come back to your senses. It would have been a strange turn if I had to lecture you on the NAP and how it applies to free speech.

myrkul

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM

Quote from: myrkul on May 19, 2013, 12:10:55 PM

Quote from: myrkul on May 19, 2013, 12:10:55 PM

You are supporting, morally and financially, the use of lethal force against me.

I am here attempting to convince you to abandon this position that puts you at violent odds with peaceful people.

So your view is that I get "convinced" by your argument or else I get killed. Once you threaten to kill someone, you lose the right to "convince."

You don't get it, do you? You're the one threatening me!

...snip...

When crytoanarchist has said he wants to kill me, you posted that you are in agreement. You follow up by saying that you stand by the statement that you would kill me for disagreeing with you. And that you would attempt to "convince" me to agree with you.

I don't believe that you are really a homicidal thug. Its very sad that you think its OK to act like one.

I'm not. I'm not going to kill you simply for disagreeing with me. You, on the other hand, have no problem with paying the people who would kill me for disagreeing with you.

Hawker

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1001

You are supporting, morally and financially, the use of lethal force against me.

I am here attempting to convince you to abandon this position that puts you at violent odds with peaceful people.

So your view is that I get "convinced" by your argument or else I get killed. Once you threaten to kill someone, you lose the right to "convince."

You don't get it, do you? You're the one threatening me!

...snip...

When crytoanarchist has said he wants to kill me, you posted that you are in agreement. You follow up by saying that you stand by the statement that you would kill me for disagreeing with you. And that you would attempt to "convince" me to agree with you.

Pasting your threat here for the record:

Quote from: cryptoanarchist on May 19, 2013, 11:23:57 AM

I don't pay taxes because I'm sickened by people like yourself who have no problem funding the bombing of innocent people. The fact that you think that that has to be faked, just goes to show what a colossal piece of shit you really are.

You see, Hawker, we practice what we preach. So do you, but what you preach is support for mass murderers.

Ah the difference between you and cryptoanarchist is simple. You don't believe in use of violence yet its his preferred way of dealing with things.

Quote from: cryptoanarchist on May 19, 2013, 10:58:18 AM

...snip...

Trust me, Hawker, given the chance I'd choke you to death with my bare hands.

...snip...

I'd be sad to see you lower yourself to that level of brutishness.

Then I would suggest you not advocate support for government mass murder whilst within my reach.

I don't believe that you are really a homicidal thug. Its very sad that you think its OK to act like one.

myrkul

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM

You are supporting, morally and financially, the use of lethal force against me.

I am here attempting to convince you to abandon this position that puts you at violent odds with peaceful people.

So your view is that I get "convinced" by your argument or else I get killed. Once you threaten to kill someone, you lose the right to "convince."

You don't get it, do you? You're the one threatening me!

Your position is that since I don't agree with you, since I am happy to pay taxes and vote in elections, that gives you the right to kill me. Since I am not alone in these things, there are a lot of people you want to have the freedom to kill. That puts your complaints that you don't want the police and courts to exist in very clear perspective doesn't it?

Hah! Nice try. I never stated a desire for police and courts to not exist. Just their monopoly.

Hawker

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Hawker on May 19, 2013, 11:45:59 AM

Quote from: myrkul on May 19, 2013, 11:42:27 AM

Quote from: Hawker on May 19, 2013, 11:45:59 AM

...snip...
Then I would suggest you not advocate support for government mass murder whilst within my reach. Wink

So, for you killing someone is OK if they disagree with you?

This is far beyond a simple disagreement. You advocate - and would support financially - the use of lethal force against me. That, I'm afraid, makes us enemies.

That's a yes then. You are saying that if someone disagrees with you, you have the right to kill them.

OK. Saved for future use.

That's a rather broad brush you're painting with, Hawkster. Let me reiterate. This is not a mere disagreement. You are supporting, morally and financially, the use of lethal force against me.

I am here attempting to convince you to abandon this position that puts you at violent odds with peaceful people.

So your view is that I get "convinced" by your argument or else I get killed. Once you threaten to kill someone, you lose the right to "convince."

Your position is that since I don't agree with you, since I am happy to pay taxes and vote in elections, that gives you the right to kill me. Since I am not alone in these things, there are a lot of people you want to have the freedom to kill. That puts your complaints that you don't want the police and courts to exist in very clear perspective doesn't it?

myrkul

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM

Quote from: myrkul on May 19, 2013, 11:42:27 AM

Quote from: myrkul on May 19, 2013, 11:42:27 AM

...snip...
Then I would suggest you not advocate support for government mass murder whilst within my reach. Wink

So, for you killing someone is OK if they disagree with you?

This is far beyond a simple disagreement. You advocate - and would support financially - the use of lethal force against me. That, I'm afraid, makes us enemies.

That's a yes then. You are saying that if someone disagrees with you, you have the right to kill them.

OK. Saved for future use.

That's a rather broad brush you're painting with, Hawkster. Let me reiterate. This is not a mere disagreement. You are supporting, morally and financially, the use of lethal force against me.

I am here attempting to convince you to abandon this position that puts you at violent odds with peaceful people.

Hawker

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1001

...snip...
Then I would suggest you not advocate support for government mass murder whilst within my reach. Wink

So, for you killing someone is OK if they disagree with you?

This is far beyond a simple disagreement. You advocate - and would support financially - the use of lethal force against me. That, I'm afraid, makes us enemies.

That's a yes then. You are saying that if someone disagrees with you, you have the right to kill them.

OK. Saved for future use.

myrkul

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM

...snip...
Then I would suggest you not advocate support for government mass murder whilst within my reach. Wink

So, for you killing someone is OK if they disagree with you?

This is far beyond a simple disagreement. You advocate - and would support financially - the use of lethal force against me. That, I'm afraid, makes us enemies.

cryptoanarchist

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1003

...snip...
Then I would suggest you not advocate support for government mass murder whilst within my reach. Wink

So, for you killing someone is OK if they disagree with you?

Nope...that's your belief - that is, as long as someone else is doing the dirty work for you.

Killing a killer is ok with me - and that's what you are by proxy when you pay taxes to a government that murders.

I'm done with you for now - you can go back to trolling on here unabated. Unlike you, I have real life things to attend to.

Hawker

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1001

...snip...
Then I would suggest you not advocate support for government mass murder whilst within my reach. Wink

So, for you killing someone is OK if they disagree with you?

cryptoanarchist

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1003

Quote from: cryptoanarchist on May 19, 2013, 11:23:57 AM

I don't pay taxes because I'm sickened by people like yourself who have no problem funding the bombing of innocent people. The fact that you think that that has to be faked, just goes to show what a colossal piece of shit you really are.

You see, Hawker, we practice what we preach. So do you, but what you preach is support for mass murderers.

Ah the difference between you and cryptoanarchist is simple. You don't believe in use of violence yet its his preferred way of dealing with things.

Quote from: cryptoanarchist on May 19, 2013, 10:58:18 AM

...snip...

Trust me, Hawker, given the chance I'd choke you to death with my bare hands.

...snip...

I'd be sad to see you lower yourself to that level of brutishness.

Are you equating the death of a slimeball like you to the mass murder of a whole country of people???

myrkul

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM

Quote from: cryptoanarchist on May 19, 2013, 11:23:57 AM

I don't pay taxes because I'm sickened by people like yourself who have no problem funding the bombing of innocent people. The fact that you think that that has to be faked, just goes to show what a colossal piece of shit you really are.

You see, Hawker, we practice what we preach. So do you, but what you preach is support for mass murderers.

Ah the difference between you and cryptoanarchist is simple. You don't believe in use of violence yet its his preferred way of dealing with things.

Quote from: cryptoanarchist on May 19, 2013, 10:58:18 AM

...snip...

Trust me, Hawker, given the chance I'd choke you to death with my bare hands.

...snip...

I'd be sad to see you lower yourself to that level of brutishness.

Then I would suggest you not advocate support for government mass murder whilst within my reach. Wink

Hawker

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1001